InSight

Market InSights:

Rudolph with Your Nose So Bright

Investing 2021

If you don’t recall the most famous reindeer of all, Rudolph, the Montgomery Ward creation possesses the special characteristic to guide Santa’s sleigh among a fog that would have otherwise canceled Christmas. Like Rudolph’s nose, I’m going to highlight a couple of macroeconomics bright spots that we like right now, that will surely support markets and guide us through the fog of 2021. Enjoy the holiday season and may you have a prosperous new year. 

Unemployment – I think it’s fair to say that the spike in unemployment (fastest spike ever) and the subsequent drop in unemployment (fastest drop ever) have given politicians the hyperbole they need, but the rate getting back to 6.7% means a couple of good things going forward. Firstly, the “easy to lose” and “easy to return” jobs were flushed out in the spike, and the jobs that could easily return have. This means that while each percentage point from here on out is going to be harder and harder, the headline risk of massive jobless swings has likely settled for now. Unemployment in the +6’s has been the recent peaks for prior negative economic swings. In 2003, we peaked at 6.3%, 1992 7.7% even the economic crisis in 2009 only saw a peak of 9.9%. So at least the unemployment figures have gotten back to “normal bad” and not “historically bad”. But here is the good news for 2021, from this point forward we will get positive headlines for employment. I think we have crested, the liquidity in the markets has helped, and near term the unemployment outlook is stable. This pandemic is different than a cyclical recession, this can be resolved as quickly as the damage was done, and for between 4-8 quarters we can see a routine and constructive print for joblessness. This will be a supportive series of headlines for markets. 

Inflation – Inflation will be a headwind for bonds and cash but will be constructive for some assets. Those invested in equities will see an increase in capital chasing the same number of assets. This inflation will be constructive for stocks and other hard assets from 2021 but will cut into the expectations for the buying power of dollars going forward. Expect long term dollar weakness. Additionally, we’re not alone, this pandemic is global and I anticipate every central bank to prefer adding liquidity to their economies over the risk of inflation. Expect countries that emerge from the pandemic quickly to see a major tailwind from global inflation, those whose course is slower and shutdowns longer to be hampered by it.  

Debt – Record low borrowing costs should tee up leveraged companies for success. This is absolutely a situation where “zombie” companies will be created, so investors should be aware of the health of companies they are buying, but long term, allowing companies that have been historically highly leveraged to restructure at amazing rates, or even granting companies that have healthy balance sheets more cheap capital to take on more cap-ex projects for the at least a decade or more will be supportive for the market on the whole. As I write this, the 2-10 spread is .8%, in my opinion giving corporate CFO’s carte blanche to begin issuing new debt and extending all maturities on existing debt. Seeing these companies become so tenacious in the debt market normally would spook investors, but it’s hard to imagine a more supportive environment for borrowers than sub-2% borrowing costs for AAA companies and sub-4% for high yield borrowers. Debt was low for the recovery after 2009 and is now bargain-basement prices. These are rates that are likely to persist through 2021 and with Janet Yellen (Dovish) at the treasury, and no change in the attitude of the Fed I’m not seeing a change in sight. This will likely mean yields will be below inflation for some time as central banks try to juice the recovery at the expense of inflation. 

Earnings – Companies have broadly been able to understate their earnings projections through the pandemic. The science of slow-rolling their debts, and lowering the expectations of analysts has been fantastic. Companies across sectors have been able to step over the lowered bar without major disruption this year. Now while, for the most part, the pandemic has given them top cover to have earnings below their historic figures, the companies in the S&P 500 have done a fantastic job this year of collectively using this window to reset the expectations of investors without sounding alarms. Managing expectations lower, then beating them has been a theme in 2020, that in 2021 will look like a great trajectory for earnings as we emerge from COVID-19. This is going to be a fantastic and virtuous atmosphere of rising earnings. The usual suspects for this earning improvement cycle will show up, banks, technology, and consumer discretionary investors will like this reset in the cycle and the aforementioned upswing in earnings these groups are poised for.

More related articles:

Boulder Risk Management, investment
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Our ‘InSight’ on Environmental Risk Management

Climate change has emerged as a pressing global issue, triggering a paradigm shift in the way organizations approach risk management. The recognition of climate-related risks and their potential impacts on operations, supply chains, regulations, and reputation has prompted a growing need for effective climate risk management strategies. In this blog post, we will explore the concept of climate risk management, its significance in the face of a changing climate, and the key steps organizations can take to mitigate these risks and ensure long-term sustainability. You won’t hear about the BEST, you WILL hear from the rest The best companies at managing their climate change risk are companies you’ll never hear about. In the vast landscape of companies striving to effectively manage their climate change risks, there are some unsung heroes that have gone above and beyond, despite not receiving widespread recognition. These companies have demonstrated a remarkable commitment to sustainable practices and proactively addressing climate-related challenges. While they may not be the household names dominating headlines, their efforts serve as a testament to the possibilities of responsible corporate action. One such company is Novo Nordisk, a Danish pharmaceutical firm that has made significant strides in integrating climate change considerations into its business operations. Novo Nordisk has set ambitious targets to reduce its carbon emissions and has been recognized as a global leader in sustainability. By investing in energy-efficient technologies, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and engaging suppliers to adopt sustainable practices, the company has managed to minimize its environmental impact. Additionally, Novo Nordisk actively collaborates with stakeholders, sharing best practices and knowledge to inspire and encourage others in the industry to follow suit. Another commendable example is Interface, a global modular flooring company based in the United States. Interface has embedded sustainability into its core business strategy and aims to have a net-zero environmental footprint by 2020. The company has taken innovative measures to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, such as implementing renewable energy projects and using recycled and bio-based materials in its products. Interface’s sustainability vision, known as “Mission Zero,” not only encompasses environmental considerations but also emphasizes social responsibility and circular economy principles. By continually pushing the boundaries of sustainable practices, Interface demonstrates that profitability and environmental stewardship can go hand in hand. These exemplary companies prove that effective climate change risk management is not limited to the spotlight-grabbing giants of the industry. Through their commitment, innovation, and collaboration, they serve as inspiring models for businesses worldwide, demonstrating that proactive measures to mitigate climate risks can yield positive environmental and financial outcomes. As more companies emulate their efforts, the collective impact can lead to a more sustainable and resilient future for our planet. You will hear about some of the companies that fail to have environmental risks managed well – and it affects their stock prices Volkswagen (VWAGY): In 2015, Volkswagen was embroiled in a scandal known as “Dieselgate.” The company admitted to intentionally manipulating emission tests to meet regulatory standards, leading to significantly higher emissions from its vehicles than reported. This failure to address climate risks and comply with emissions regulations not only resulted in financial penalties and a loss of trust from customers but also tarnished VW’s brand reputation and led to a significant decline in its market value. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PCE): PG&E, a California-based utility company, faced severe consequences due to its lack of preparedness for climate-related risks. The company’s inadequate management of vegetation near its power lines contributed to the ignition of multiple wildfires in recent years, including the devastating Camp Fire in 2018. The resulting property damage, loss of life, and legal liabilities forced PG&E to file for bankruptcy and face intense scrutiny over its failure to implement proper climate risk management practices. Adidas (ADDYY): In 2011, Adidas, a major sports apparel and footwear company, faced supply chain disruptions due to extreme weather events in Asia. Floods in Thailand, where many of its suppliers were located, resulted in factory closures and disrupted production. Adidas experienced delays in product delivery and lost sales, revealing the vulnerability of its supply chain to climate-related risks. This incident emphasized the need for companies to assess and address the potential impacts of extreme weather events on their supply chains and take proactive measures to build resilience. BP (British Petroleum) (BP): BP, a multinational oil and gas company, faced a significant environmental disaster in 2010 when the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico. The incident resulted in one of the largest oil spills in history, causing extensive ecological damage to marine ecosystems and coastal communities. The company was criticized for its insufficient risk management practices and failure to adequately prepare for and respond to such an event, highlighting the importance of having robust climate risk management plans in place for the oil and gas industry. At InSight, we focus on managing climate change balance sheet risk Understanding Climate Risk: Climate risk refers to the potential adverse impacts of climate change on an organization’s assets, operations, and stakeholders. These risks encompass a wide range of factors, including extreme weather events, sea-level rise, shifting weather patterns, regulatory changes, and shifts in public perception and consumer preferences. Organizations must assess the vulnerabilities and exposure of their operations to these risks to understand the magnitude of the challenges they face. Developing Adaptation Strategies: Incorporating climate risk management into an organization’s overall risk management framework is essential for building resilience and ensuring business continuity. The first step is to conduct a thorough assessment of the potential impacts of climate change on various aspects of the business. This assessment should consider both physical risks (e.g., damage to infrastructure, disruptions in supply chains) and transition risks (e.g., regulatory changes, market shifts). Based on this assessment, organizations can develop adaptation strategies tailored to their specific circumstances. These strategies may include investing in resilient infrastructure, diversifying supply chains to reduce dependencies on vulnerable regions, implementing energy-efficient practices, and exploring low-carbon business models. It is crucial to involve stakeholders from different

Read More »
Boulder Financial Advisors, Planning and Zending
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Interested in achieving wealth? Psychology may be a better starting place…

This blog post explores the intriguing relationship between mental well-being and economic prosperity. We delve into the world of economics and psychology to investigate whether therapy, aspirational videos, and antidepressants can pave the way to financial success. In our quest for prosperity, we often focus on tangible solutions such as infrastructure development and economic policies. However, an intriguing and emerging field of economic research is shedding light on the profound impact of psychological interventions on wealth accumulation. In this blog post, we delve into the fascinating intersection of economics and mental well-being, exploring the question: Can therapy, aspirational videos, and even antidepressants pave the way to financial success? In impoverished nations grappling with the aftermath of war, violence, food scarcity, or natural disasters, trauma is pervasive. Psychological interventions hold promise as modest tools for economic self-improvement. For instance, a study in Ethiopia examined the psychological effects of elevating aspirations. Researchers conducted a randomized control trial, screening short films depicting business and entrepreneurial success within the community to one group. Six months later, those who had watched the films had exhibited more work, savings, and investments in education compared to the control group. Even five years down the line, households exposed to the films had accumulated more wealth, and their children had received an additional 0.43 years of education, which is considered quite remarkable. A similar impact was observed in Mexico, where an aspirational video shown to female microenterprise owners resulted in improved business performance through a randomized control trial. Intensive versions of such treatments are likely to be effective. Certain cultures, like the overseas Chinese and Lebanese communities, have traditionally displayed strong entrepreneurial tendencies, benefiting from a steady diet of cultural influences, including parental guidance, peer pressure, aspirational media, music, and television. The question is not whether cultural conditioning works—it does—but rather how effective a smaller, more targeted dose can be. However, some psychological interventions yield only temporary effects. For example, a study in India taught self-efficacy lessons to women, leading to a 32% short-term increase in employment likelihood, but the effects faded within a year. When it comes to psychotherapy, prominent in much of the Western world, evaluating its impact is challenging due to cost and regulatory constraints that hinder randomized control trials. Nevertheless, there are encouraging findings. A survey across lower- and middle-income countries identified 39 studies demonstrating that psychotherapeutic treatments could enhance work-related outcomes, including employment, through randomized control trials. Treating schizophrenia seems to have a particularly significant effect. In Pakistan, mental health treatments for perinatally depressed mothers yielded substantial benefits for their children. In Niger, both psychosocial treatments and cash transfers improved outcomes for recipients, although in Kenya, cash transfers proved cheaper and more effective, though psychotherapeutic treatments did yield some gains. As for antidepressants, economists are only beginning to gather evidence. One study in India found that combining antidepressants with therapy and livelihood assistance had significant positive effects for treated women. Lower depression rates resulted in increased investment in their children and reduced negative life events. While none of these findings conclusively establish a “psychology of poverty” to be addressed through external interventions, they do suggest that less affluent economies can make incremental gains by investing in what we might call psychological and psychotherapeutic infrastructure. These research designs can be applied to hundreds or thousands of people, though implementing them on a nationwide scale remains challenging. Nevertheless, countries can strive to make therapeutic help more accessible and affordable while fostering a culture where seeking help is encouraged. Culture plays a crucial role in economic development, and these small-scale cultural interventions can have a marginal impact. What about the United States, with its abundance of psychotherapeutic ideas, aspirational videos, and antidepressants? It’s hard to say. While the research is in its early stages, it may not be too soon to suggest that, from an economic perspective at least, embracing psychological and pharmaceutical interventions more openly could be better than the alternative.

Read More »
Boulder Financial Advisors
Articles
Kevin Taylor

The AI Showdown: Unveiling the Global Race for Technological Supremacy

The global AI race between the United States and China has been a prominent topic in recent years, as both countries strive to establish themselves as leaders in artificial intelligence. This competition has spurred significant investments in AI research, development, and infrastructure, with particular emphasis on chips and AI technologies. The United States, with its long-standing tradition of technological innovation, has been at the forefront of AI advancements. American tech giants such as Google, Microsoft, and IBM have heavily invested in AI research and development, establishing themselves as key players in the industry. The U.S. government has also recognized the strategic importance of AI and has taken steps to support its growth through funding initiatives, regulatory frameworks, and collaborations between academia and industry. On the other hand, China has rapidly emerged as a formidable competitor in the AI race. The Chinese government has set ambitious goals to become the global leader in AI by 2030, outlining plans to invest heavily in research and development, talent acquisition, and infrastructure. China’s large population and vast consumer market provide a fertile ground for AI implementation, leading to the proliferation of AI-powered applications in various sectors such as e-commerce, finance, and healthcare. Chinese companies like Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent have made significant advancements in AI technologies and have been actively expanding their influence both domestically and globally. Chips play a critical role in AI development, as they form the foundation for powering AI algorithms and applications. The United States and China have recognized the strategic importance of chip manufacturing and have made substantial investments in this area. The U.S. semiconductor industry has long been a global leader, with companies like Intel, Nvidia, and Qualcomm driving innovation. However, China has been making significant efforts to reduce its reliance on foreign chip technology and establish its domestic semiconductor industry. The Chinese government has invested billions of dollars in supporting local chip manufacturers and fostering collaborations with international semiconductor companies. Both the United States and China understand that AI has far-reaching implications, not only in terms of economic growth but also for national security and military applications. AI technologies have the potential to enhance military capabilities, automate warfare systems, and drive advancements in autonomous weapons. As a result, there is a growing concern about an arms race in AI between these two superpowers. To support their respective AI ambitions, both countries have also been investing in military-related AI research and development. The United States has established the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) and is actively exploring the integration of AI into defense systems. Similarly, China has made significant investments in military AI applications, with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) focusing on areas such as autonomous vehicles, intelligent surveillance, and battlefield decision-making systems. It is important to note that while the United States and China are at the forefront of the global AI race, other countries and regions are also making significant strides in AI research and development. Countries like Canada, the United Kingdom, and Germany, among others, have their own AI initiatives and are fostering innovation in this field. As the competition intensifies, the United States and China must balance their pursuit of technological dominance with ethical considerations, transparency, and international collaboration. The development and deployment of AI technologies should be guided by principles that prioritize human rights, privacy, and accountability. By fostering a cooperative approach, global collaboration can drive the responsible and beneficial use of AI, benefiting society as a whole. The global AI race between the United States and China presents various investment opportunities and potential conflicts. Let’s explore them further: Investment Opportunities: AI Research and Development: Both the United States and China are investing heavily in AI research and development. This creates opportunities for companies and startups specializing in AI technologies, algorithms, and applications. Funding and partnerships from government agencies, venture capital firms, and tech giants can fuel innovation and growth in this sector. Semiconductor Industry: The development of AI requires high-performance chips, and investment in the semiconductor industry is crucial. Companies involved in chip manufacturing, design, and fabrication, as well as those focused on AI-specific chips, can benefit from the increased demand for advanced semiconductor technology. AI Infrastructure: The race to develop robust AI infrastructure, including cloud computing, data centers, and network capabilities, offers investment opportunities. Building scalable and secure infrastructure to handle the vast amounts of data and computational requirements of AI applications is a key focus area. AI Startups and Incubators: The growing interest in AI creates a fertile ground for startups and incubators specializing in AI technologies. Investors can identify promising startups and provide funding, mentoring, and resources to help them flourish. These startups can offer disruptive AI solutions in various sectors, presenting attractive investment opportunities. Conflicts and Challenges: Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer: The competition between the United States and China can lead to intellectual property disputes, as both countries strive to protect their AI advancements. Issues related to technology transfer, trade secrets, and patent infringements may arise, potentially leading to conflicts and legal battles. Talent Acquisition and Retention: Both countries face challenges in attracting and retaining top AI talent. The demand for skilled AI professionals exceeds the current supply, creating a talent shortage. This talent competition can result in wage inflation, poaching of experts, and brain drain from certain regions, leading to conflicts and talent imbalances. Ethical Considerations: As AI technology advances, ethical considerations become increasingly important. Conflicts may arise when different countries or organizations have divergent views on the ethical use of AI, particularly in areas such as privacy, bias, algorithmic transparency, and autonomous weapons. Establishing international standards and regulations to address these concerns can be a complex and contentious process. National Security and Military Applications: The militarization of AI can heighten conflicts between nations. Developing AI for military applications, such as autonomous weapons and cyber warfare, raises concerns about arms races and the potential for escalating tensions. Striking a balance between innovation and ensuring responsible use of AI in the military domain is crucial to

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest