InSight

Market InSights:

Rudolph with Your Nose So Bright

Investing 2021

If you don’t recall the most famous reindeer of all, Rudolph, the Montgomery Ward creation possesses the special characteristic to guide Santa’s sleigh among a fog that would have otherwise canceled Christmas. Like Rudolph’s nose, I’m going to highlight a couple of macroeconomics bright spots that we like right now, that will surely support markets and guide us through the fog of 2021. Enjoy the holiday season and may you have a prosperous new year. 

Unemployment – I think it’s fair to say that the spike in unemployment (fastest spike ever) and the subsequent drop in unemployment (fastest drop ever) have given politicians the hyperbole they need, but the rate getting back to 6.7% means a couple of good things going forward. Firstly, the “easy to lose” and “easy to return” jobs were flushed out in the spike, and the jobs that could easily return have. This means that while each percentage point from here on out is going to be harder and harder, the headline risk of massive jobless swings has likely settled for now. Unemployment in the +6’s has been the recent peaks for prior negative economic swings. In 2003, we peaked at 6.3%, 1992 7.7% even the economic crisis in 2009 only saw a peak of 9.9%. So at least the unemployment figures have gotten back to “normal bad” and not “historically bad”. But here is the good news for 2021, from this point forward we will get positive headlines for employment. I think we have crested, the liquidity in the markets has helped, and near term the unemployment outlook is stable. This pandemic is different than a cyclical recession, this can be resolved as quickly as the damage was done, and for between 4-8 quarters we can see a routine and constructive print for joblessness. This will be a supportive series of headlines for markets. 

Inflation – Inflation will be a headwind for bonds and cash but will be constructive for some assets. Those invested in equities will see an increase in capital chasing the same number of assets. This inflation will be constructive for stocks and other hard assets from 2021 but will cut into the expectations for the buying power of dollars going forward. Expect long term dollar weakness. Additionally, we’re not alone, this pandemic is global and I anticipate every central bank to prefer adding liquidity to their economies over the risk of inflation. Expect countries that emerge from the pandemic quickly to see a major tailwind from global inflation, those whose course is slower and shutdowns longer to be hampered by it.  

Debt – Record low borrowing costs should tee up leveraged companies for success. This is absolutely a situation where “zombie” companies will be created, so investors should be aware of the health of companies they are buying, but long term, allowing companies that have been historically highly leveraged to restructure at amazing rates, or even granting companies that have healthy balance sheets more cheap capital to take on more cap-ex projects for the at least a decade or more will be supportive for the market on the whole. As I write this, the 2-10 spread is .8%, in my opinion giving corporate CFO’s carte blanche to begin issuing new debt and extending all maturities on existing debt. Seeing these companies become so tenacious in the debt market normally would spook investors, but it’s hard to imagine a more supportive environment for borrowers than sub-2% borrowing costs for AAA companies and sub-4% for high yield borrowers. Debt was low for the recovery after 2009 and is now bargain-basement prices. These are rates that are likely to persist through 2021 and with Janet Yellen (Dovish) at the treasury, and no change in the attitude of the Fed I’m not seeing a change in sight. This will likely mean yields will be below inflation for some time as central banks try to juice the recovery at the expense of inflation. 

Earnings – Companies have broadly been able to understate their earnings projections through the pandemic. The science of slow-rolling their debts, and lowering the expectations of analysts has been fantastic. Companies across sectors have been able to step over the lowered bar without major disruption this year. Now while, for the most part, the pandemic has given them top cover to have earnings below their historic figures, the companies in the S&P 500 have done a fantastic job this year of collectively using this window to reset the expectations of investors without sounding alarms. Managing expectations lower, then beating them has been a theme in 2020, that in 2021 will look like a great trajectory for earnings as we emerge from COVID-19. This is going to be a fantastic and virtuous atmosphere of rising earnings. The usual suspects for this earning improvement cycle will show up, banks, technology, and consumer discretionary investors will like this reset in the cycle and the aforementioned upswing in earnings these groups are poised for.

More related articles:

Boulder Financial Advisors
Articles
Kevin Taylor

The AI Showdown: Unveiling the Global Race for Technological Supremacy

The global AI race between the United States and China has been a prominent topic in recent years, as both countries strive to establish themselves as leaders in artificial intelligence. This competition has spurred significant investments in AI research, development, and infrastructure, with particular emphasis on chips and AI technologies. The United States, with its long-standing tradition of technological innovation, has been at the forefront of AI advancements. American tech giants such as Google, Microsoft, and IBM have heavily invested in AI research and development, establishing themselves as key players in the industry. The U.S. government has also recognized the strategic importance of AI and has taken steps to support its growth through funding initiatives, regulatory frameworks, and collaborations between academia and industry. On the other hand, China has rapidly emerged as a formidable competitor in the AI race. The Chinese government has set ambitious goals to become the global leader in AI by 2030, outlining plans to invest heavily in research and development, talent acquisition, and infrastructure. China’s large population and vast consumer market provide a fertile ground for AI implementation, leading to the proliferation of AI-powered applications in various sectors such as e-commerce, finance, and healthcare. Chinese companies like Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent have made significant advancements in AI technologies and have been actively expanding their influence both domestically and globally. Chips play a critical role in AI development, as they form the foundation for powering AI algorithms and applications. The United States and China have recognized the strategic importance of chip manufacturing and have made substantial investments in this area. The U.S. semiconductor industry has long been a global leader, with companies like Intel, Nvidia, and Qualcomm driving innovation. However, China has been making significant efforts to reduce its reliance on foreign chip technology and establish its domestic semiconductor industry. The Chinese government has invested billions of dollars in supporting local chip manufacturers and fostering collaborations with international semiconductor companies. Both the United States and China understand that AI has far-reaching implications, not only in terms of economic growth but also for national security and military applications. AI technologies have the potential to enhance military capabilities, automate warfare systems, and drive advancements in autonomous weapons. As a result, there is a growing concern about an arms race in AI between these two superpowers. To support their respective AI ambitions, both countries have also been investing in military-related AI research and development. The United States has established the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) and is actively exploring the integration of AI into defense systems. Similarly, China has made significant investments in military AI applications, with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) focusing on areas such as autonomous vehicles, intelligent surveillance, and battlefield decision-making systems. It is important to note that while the United States and China are at the forefront of the global AI race, other countries and regions are also making significant strides in AI research and development. Countries like Canada, the United Kingdom, and Germany, among others, have their own AI initiatives and are fostering innovation in this field. As the competition intensifies, the United States and China must balance their pursuit of technological dominance with ethical considerations, transparency, and international collaboration. The development and deployment of AI technologies should be guided by principles that prioritize human rights, privacy, and accountability. By fostering a cooperative approach, global collaboration can drive the responsible and beneficial use of AI, benefiting society as a whole. The global AI race between the United States and China presents various investment opportunities and potential conflicts. Let’s explore them further: Investment Opportunities: AI Research and Development: Both the United States and China are investing heavily in AI research and development. This creates opportunities for companies and startups specializing in AI technologies, algorithms, and applications. Funding and partnerships from government agencies, venture capital firms, and tech giants can fuel innovation and growth in this sector. Semiconductor Industry: The development of AI requires high-performance chips, and investment in the semiconductor industry is crucial. Companies involved in chip manufacturing, design, and fabrication, as well as those focused on AI-specific chips, can benefit from the increased demand for advanced semiconductor technology. AI Infrastructure: The race to develop robust AI infrastructure, including cloud computing, data centers, and network capabilities, offers investment opportunities. Building scalable and secure infrastructure to handle the vast amounts of data and computational requirements of AI applications is a key focus area. AI Startups and Incubators: The growing interest in AI creates a fertile ground for startups and incubators specializing in AI technologies. Investors can identify promising startups and provide funding, mentoring, and resources to help them flourish. These startups can offer disruptive AI solutions in various sectors, presenting attractive investment opportunities. Conflicts and Challenges: Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer: The competition between the United States and China can lead to intellectual property disputes, as both countries strive to protect their AI advancements. Issues related to technology transfer, trade secrets, and patent infringements may arise, potentially leading to conflicts and legal battles. Talent Acquisition and Retention: Both countries face challenges in attracting and retaining top AI talent. The demand for skilled AI professionals exceeds the current supply, creating a talent shortage. This talent competition can result in wage inflation, poaching of experts, and brain drain from certain regions, leading to conflicts and talent imbalances. Ethical Considerations: As AI technology advances, ethical considerations become increasingly important. Conflicts may arise when different countries or organizations have divergent views on the ethical use of AI, particularly in areas such as privacy, bias, algorithmic transparency, and autonomous weapons. Establishing international standards and regulations to address these concerns can be a complex and contentious process. National Security and Military Applications: The militarization of AI can heighten conflicts between nations. Developing AI for military applications, such as autonomous weapons and cyber warfare, raises concerns about arms races and the potential for escalating tensions. Striking a balance between innovation and ensuring responsible use of AI in the military domain is crucial to

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Using a Delaware Statutory Trusts (DST) with 1031 Exchange Investments

Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) are extremely popular with 1031 exchange investors. In addition to the tax mitigation aspects of the 1031 itself, they allow investors to diversify the make-up of an investment portfolio, access new buildings and investment types, and easily scale up or down the size of their real estate portfolio. 1031 exchange investors favor DSTs due to the fact that it can be difficult to identify a replacement property within 45 days and in most cases, the DST can accept the exact balance investors are looking to replace a part of the 1031 Exchange. What is a Delaware Statutory Trust? The name will usually confuse new investors. The “Delaware” in Delaware Statutory Trusts is simply a component of the law being initially conceived and developed in Delaware. A common state for incorporation and legal standing. The use of the DST structure helps keep the title clean in connection with ownership by many co-investors. It separates the investor holding title individually into a holding in a new trust where the investor is the beneficial owner. The trustee of the trust can take actions on behalf of the trust beneficiaries (i.e. the DST investors/owners) which does not require agreement by all. Why invest in a DST? Few investors have the requisite net worth to own a 30-story office complex and keep the real estate exposure for their portfolio in line with their risk expectations. That is where the use of DSTs comes into play. A DST is attractive to an investor who desires access to a single property or portfolio of high-value, high-quality real estate asset(s) that may not otherwise be available to them due to size or service constraints. A DST puts the management and ownership of a real estate venture into a manageable box for most investor types. Collecting income, managing taxes, and maintaining the risk are all far easier in the real estate space through the DST structure. The investor receives a deeded fractional ownership in the property in a percentage based upon the equity invested. Is a DST like a REIT? It has some characteristics of a REIT or Real Estate Investment Trust but is different, including the fact that it is often, but not always, just a single property. In addition, the owner of REIT shares holds a partnership interest in the underlying real estate investment. Partnership investments do not qualify for 1031 exchange investments, even if the underlying asset consists of real estate. How does the DST provide income? Similar to the other real estate investments, DSTs generally pay monthly or quarterly an amount based on the excess rent over the property expenses. This includes any mortgage payments so as the debt service is paid, the equity ownership of the investor shifts as well. The Return on Equity (RoE) varies from deal to deal based on the specifics of the property, the building type, and financing goals. With most deals, the sponsor knows the net rent that can be expected and can give the investor the anticipated return for the term of the investment. How long does the DST operate? Most DSTs have a well-defined expectation for liquidation of the asset. The asset’s holding period varies and is prescribed in the beginning, but most have an intermediate time frame. Usually, 3-7 years and the investor shares in the same percentage basis the appreciation in value upon sale of the property. How does the liquidation work? This final stage of a DST is a complete liquidation of the Real Estate assets. This is also part of the investor’s stake in the holding. This can increase the overall annualized return by a couple of percentage points and is paid out in cash upon liquidation. While most investors seek out real estate for the prospect of a current and predictable income – tax mitigated capital appreciation as part of the real estate investment is typically the larger portion of the total return of the investment. Who can buy into a DST? The manner in which DSTs are marketed to the public has a lot of characteristics of sales of securities. Over time, the SEC decided to regulate them as actual sales of securities. So, although a DST interest retains the nature of real estate ownership, with some exceptions, they are regulated. They are typically brought to market for syndication by large well-known sponsors, although they have to be acquired through a Broker, Registered Investment Advisor, or a licensed Financial Advisor. The DST structure usually, if not always, requires the investor meets the Accredited Investor standard as the offerings are listed through the Reg D issuing process. Typically, the broker or advisor will vet all offerings of the sponsors with whom they have an agreement and that level of due diligence is a benefit to the investor who is unlikely to have the wherewithal to review the investment as closely.

Read More »
Inflation
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Four Things That Actually Matter With Inflation

Inflation is simply the rising costs of goods and services over time. It’s an important part of the planning process to make assumptions about buying power over time. It allows you to know how to budget your money using a placeholder that should represent to some academic degree the effectiveness of your dollar as you get closer to the time you need it. However, I have had several discussions with clients who assume the incline of inflation is something like 2% annually. And while that is a reasonable, and likely adequate initial placeholder, if your financial advisor is simply using that number because the talking heads on TV or the software they use have that number already baked in, then you need to have a serious discussion about the gaps that arise from such short cutting. A miss on the inflation discussion has two permanent repercussions on your financial plan: Inflation assesses its toll further and further into plans. It’s insidious and you won’t know the impact until the end of retirement, when you have fewer resources to make course corrections. It will affect what your expectation should be for your internal rate of return, particularly in your fixed income investments. If you are assuming a 2% inflation rate a 2% treasury may be appropriate, but if your personal inflation rate is actually 4% (likely from the reasons below) you will have an unaccounted for gap between the rising costs of goods and services and the yield from your chosen investments. This article is a good checklist to make sure that your financial advisor can discuss and will make adjustments for this gaps in inflation math: Your lifestyle No two retirees live the same lifestyle in retirement. If heard other advisors say that, and be able to adjust the product suite they use for risk, or which goals they bake into a plan, or even change the expected costs they use from goal to goal. But then each of them will extrapolate the costs of that lifestyle inflating at 2%. This is a mistake. This shows a lack of understanding as to what causes inflation and the effect it will have on your plan.  Inflation does not affect all products equally, in fact the most impacted items are usually isolated to the items that are purchased by everyone. Groceries, gasoline, and basic services are more impacted by steadily rising costs than that of large ticket consumer goods and electronics.  You may think that this isn’t a big deal right? We all buy groceries and that is a part of my financial plan. This type of thinking is ill-advised and offers a major gap in the calculations and the expectations you should have for your income.  Example: A client of mine said:  “I have a simple life, I don’t buy that many new things, and I’m not all that interested owning new cars, clothes and gadgets in retirement, my calculation for inflation should be pretty low.”  So he wanted me to lower his expected rate of inflation. I said wait a minute, you’re not thinking about that correctly, while yes, he is right that the things he buys may be simple and he’s not going to buy much, he’s wrong about the effect of inflation. Because he’s using the “2% average” he’s heard about he’s missed where the number comes from. The CPI is the change in a basket of goods and services, so it takes into account everything a regular american can reasonably buy (and it doesn’t include gasoline). So in aggregate the number may be 2%, but by not buying those items he’s taking on more, not less, inflation risk for the normal person. See in the chart below where we have eliminated the baskets he didn’t see himself buying (recall that the higher ticket consumer goods generally are disinflationary – the cost of a flat screen TV comes down with time and not up).  Item Annual change in inflation as a Percentage(%) Example clients inflation estimate Groceries +4% +4% Utilities +5% +5% Gasoline +5% +5% Movie Passes +4% +4% Healthcare +6% +6% Automobiles -3% NA Consumer Electronics -3% NA Clothing -2% NA Average 2% 4.8%   So while he is thinking that his appetite for spending is low, his exposure to inflation is more than twice the normal of people in retirement. So when we plan we are trying to extrapolate the costs of a certain lifestyle in retirement, in this scenario the inflation expectation should rise for this client, not fall. More severely, using a standard 2% inflation rate, will cause him to have a shortfall that becomes more complicated as he gets deeper and deeper into retirement.  Declining quality is inflation Several of the items that comprise your quality of life today, deteriorate in quality over time. This is not a hard and fast rule, and in some cases the opposite is true. But if you think about the nature of appliances, automobiles, and other big ticket consumer goods they can become suspect. The refresh cycle for large appliances in the 1990’s was 20% longer than it is for today. This is the result of a few elements, the “smart” revolution and added technology creating more demand for new items, and the decline in their quality. Both of these are measured as disinflationary, the costs of these items have come down year over year, and the “features-scape” is expanding. This all seems disinflationary and in the CPI it’s measured as costs coming down on these items. And while that might be a true statement for someone, the Bureau of Labor Statistics “buys” these items year over year to test the market changes, and for most people this is actually hidden inflation. Here is the math. If the price of an item comes down year over year by say 4%, but the refresh cycle is impacted by anything greater than 4% in a year, the result for regular people is actually inflation, not deflation. Because the

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest