InSight

4 reasons to work with professional fiduciary

Financial Planning Dentist

As an investor, it’s important to work with someone who has your best interests in mind. That’s where an Accredited Investment Fiduciary® (AIF®) comes in. An AIF® is a financial professional who has undergone specialized training in fiduciary responsibility and investment management through the Fi360 Designee process which is accredited by the American National Standard Institute (ANSI).

The fiduciary role is an essential aspect of financial advising, requiring a high level of ethical responsibility to prioritize the interests of the client above all else. However, simply claiming to be a fiduciary is not enough. The process associated with being an Accredited Investment Fiduciary® (AIF®) elevates fiduciary responsibility to a science, complete with a rigorous process and discipline essential to the act of truly being a fiduciary. By undergoing specialized training and adhering to strict standards of due diligence, risk management, and regulatory compliance, an AIF® provides a level of expertise and commitment to their clients that goes beyond simply claiming to act in their best interests. The AIF® designation represents a proven commitment to the science of fiduciary responsibility and a dedication to helping clients achieve their financial goals.

Here are a few reasons why it’s important to work with an AIF®:

Fiduciary Responsibility

An AIF® is held to a high standard of fiduciary responsibility. This means that they are legally and ethically obligated to act in their client’s best interests. This includes putting your financial goals and interests ahead of your own. By working with an AIF®, you can have confidence that your investments are being managed in a way that aligns with your long-term goals.

Specialized Training as a Professional Fiduciary

To earn the AIF® designation, financial professionals must complete specialized training in investment management and fiduciary responsibility. This training covers topics like investment due diligence, risk management, and regulatory compliance. By working with an AIF®, you can be confident that your financial advisor has the knowledge and expertise to help you make informed investment decisions.

Objective Advice

An AIF® is committed to providing objective advice to its clients. They are not incentivized to sell specific products or investments, so you can trust that their recommendations are based solely on your needs and goals. This can help you avoid conflicts of interest that can arise with other types of financial advisors.

Peace of Mind

Investing can be complex and overwhelming, especially if you’re not familiar with the world of finance. By working with an AIF®, you can have peace of mind knowing that your investments are being managed by a qualified professional who has your best interests in mind.

We know working with an Accredited Investment Fiduciary® (AIF®) can provide many benefits for investors. From fiduciary responsibility to specialized training, objective advice, and peace of mind, an AIF® can help you make informed investment decisions that align with your long-term goals. So if you’re looking for a financial advisor, be sure to consider working with an AIF®.

More related articles:

Boulder Risk Management, investment
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Our ‘InSight’ on Environmental Risk Management

Climate change has emerged as a pressing global issue, triggering a paradigm shift in the way organizations approach risk management. The recognition of climate-related risks and their potential impacts on operations, supply chains, regulations, and reputation has prompted a growing need for effective climate risk management strategies. In this blog post, we will explore the concept of climate risk management, its significance in the face of a changing climate, and the key steps organizations can take to mitigate these risks and ensure long-term sustainability. You won’t hear about the BEST, you WILL hear from the rest The best companies at managing their climate change risk are companies you’ll never hear about. In the vast landscape of companies striving to effectively manage their climate change risks, there are some unsung heroes that have gone above and beyond, despite not receiving widespread recognition. These companies have demonstrated a remarkable commitment to sustainable practices and proactively addressing climate-related challenges. While they may not be the household names dominating headlines, their efforts serve as a testament to the possibilities of responsible corporate action. One such company is Novo Nordisk, a Danish pharmaceutical firm that has made significant strides in integrating climate change considerations into its business operations. Novo Nordisk has set ambitious targets to reduce its carbon emissions and has been recognized as a global leader in sustainability. By investing in energy-efficient technologies, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and engaging suppliers to adopt sustainable practices, the company has managed to minimize its environmental impact. Additionally, Novo Nordisk actively collaborates with stakeholders, sharing best practices and knowledge to inspire and encourage others in the industry to follow suit. Another commendable example is Interface, a global modular flooring company based in the United States. Interface has embedded sustainability into its core business strategy and aims to have a net-zero environmental footprint by 2020. The company has taken innovative measures to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, such as implementing renewable energy projects and using recycled and bio-based materials in its products. Interface’s sustainability vision, known as “Mission Zero,” not only encompasses environmental considerations but also emphasizes social responsibility and circular economy principles. By continually pushing the boundaries of sustainable practices, Interface demonstrates that profitability and environmental stewardship can go hand in hand. These exemplary companies prove that effective climate change risk management is not limited to the spotlight-grabbing giants of the industry. Through their commitment, innovation, and collaboration, they serve as inspiring models for businesses worldwide, demonstrating that proactive measures to mitigate climate risks can yield positive environmental and financial outcomes. As more companies emulate their efforts, the collective impact can lead to a more sustainable and resilient future for our planet. You will hear about some of the companies that fail to have environmental risks managed well – and it affects their stock prices Volkswagen (VWAGY): In 2015, Volkswagen was embroiled in a scandal known as “Dieselgate.” The company admitted to intentionally manipulating emission tests to meet regulatory standards, leading to significantly higher emissions from its vehicles than reported. This failure to address climate risks and comply with emissions regulations not only resulted in financial penalties and a loss of trust from customers but also tarnished VW’s brand reputation and led to a significant decline in its market value. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PCE): PG&E, a California-based utility company, faced severe consequences due to its lack of preparedness for climate-related risks. The company’s inadequate management of vegetation near its power lines contributed to the ignition of multiple wildfires in recent years, including the devastating Camp Fire in 2018. The resulting property damage, loss of life, and legal liabilities forced PG&E to file for bankruptcy and face intense scrutiny over its failure to implement proper climate risk management practices. Adidas (ADDYY): In 2011, Adidas, a major sports apparel and footwear company, faced supply chain disruptions due to extreme weather events in Asia. Floods in Thailand, where many of its suppliers were located, resulted in factory closures and disrupted production. Adidas experienced delays in product delivery and lost sales, revealing the vulnerability of its supply chain to climate-related risks. This incident emphasized the need for companies to assess and address the potential impacts of extreme weather events on their supply chains and take proactive measures to build resilience. BP (British Petroleum) (BP): BP, a multinational oil and gas company, faced a significant environmental disaster in 2010 when the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico. The incident resulted in one of the largest oil spills in history, causing extensive ecological damage to marine ecosystems and coastal communities. The company was criticized for its insufficient risk management practices and failure to adequately prepare for and respond to such an event, highlighting the importance of having robust climate risk management plans in place for the oil and gas industry. At InSight, we focus on managing climate change balance sheet risk Understanding Climate Risk: Climate risk refers to the potential adverse impacts of climate change on an organization’s assets, operations, and stakeholders. These risks encompass a wide range of factors, including extreme weather events, sea-level rise, shifting weather patterns, regulatory changes, and shifts in public perception and consumer preferences. Organizations must assess the vulnerabilities and exposure of their operations to these risks to understand the magnitude of the challenges they face. Developing Adaptation Strategies: Incorporating climate risk management into an organization’s overall risk management framework is essential for building resilience and ensuring business continuity. The first step is to conduct a thorough assessment of the potential impacts of climate change on various aspects of the business. This assessment should consider both physical risks (e.g., damage to infrastructure, disruptions in supply chains) and transition risks (e.g., regulatory changes, market shifts). Based on this assessment, organizations can develop adaptation strategies tailored to their specific circumstances. These strategies may include investing in resilient infrastructure, diversifying supply chains to reduce dependencies on vulnerable regions, implementing energy-efficient practices, and exploring low-carbon business models. It is crucial to involve stakeholders from different

Read More »

How do you manage a daily budget while also planning for your short and long term goals no matter the income?

Planning for both your short term goals while being cognizant of your long term aspirations is really difficult to grasp especially when you’re unsure of what the future “budget” is or should look like. At InSight, our mission is to re-define the client advisor relationship and break away from how it was and unfortunately still is being done.  Advisors in the past ask people what their goals are now without the client having an understanding of what is actually possible.  For example: If my goal is to save $500 a month because it’s what fits my income and budgetary restrictions do I actually know what this will amount to in the future? Or maybe you’re 35 and you’ve saved $100,000 which is incredible but what does that actually mean?  Without knowing how things like compounding, inflation, savings, and returns impact your long term goals most people don’t know how to answer the questions above which is why it’s so important to understand what is possible first so you can actually put together a plan.  So, let’s make up a client. Their name is Frances. Frances is single, 30 years old and makes $75,000 a year. They’ve saved $10,000 so far in their investment account that tracks the whole market and $20,000 in their 401(k) that is in a diversified portfolio her employer offered. Since they just paid off their debt they are going to be able to save at minimum 10% into a 401(k) and $5,000 into their savings account annually increasing with inflation (2.3%). Their employer matches 100% of their contribution up to 5% of their salary. Quick Quiz – How much will Frances have in their investment account if they have $10,000 now and add $5,000 annually increasing with inflation in 30 years? What about in their 401(k) that has $20,000 in a diversified portfolio and they’re contributing 10% of their income each year increasing with inflation?  What is the value of France’s Investment Account? A) $300,000 B) $250,000 C) $400,000 D) $800,000 What is the value of France’s 401(k)? A) $450,000 B) $600,000 C) $535,000 D) $1,200,000 If you didn’t guess D for both questions then you may be underestimating the value of compounding. Now that you can see what is possible isn’t it a little bit easier to plan? For most of us, thinking about the long term is difficult to grasp. This is why it’s so important to sit down with a planner to see what’s possible then talk about building out the plan.  For most, knowing you could have over 2 million dollars when you’re 60 is a dream come true. Unfortunately, most people don’t have anywhere close to this and I think it’s because they didn’t know what was possible when they were young. So whatever your goals are, the best thing you can start doing is saving early and as much as you can. Remember income – savings = expenses. Acquire debt that is accretive, helping you build your net worth, and pay off and stay away from erosive, or bad debt, like credit cards and car loans. Buy a used car instead.  If you have a goal, automate your savings and use a standard compounding calculator (lots of free ones online) to see, with a realistic rate of return, how much you need to start saving to get to your goal. If you need help schedule a consultation.  Check out our other articles on savings and buying a new home for more information! 

Read More »

Investment Bias: Framing

Framing effect is the use of language to frame a question in a positive or negative way. Stating the same question with the right spin allows the inquirer to impart some direction on the inquired. A great example of this: Would you rather: Approve the 20% chance of killing 100 patients. Approve the 80% chance of saving 400 patients. These might be two consequences of the same decision, but they frame in a way the bleeds an emotional context into an otherwise utilitarian calculation. For investors, framing is often used to manipulate a person’s relationship to risk.  Would you rather own a 99% chance to have a 10% upside, or a 1% change to lose everything. People are more likely to spend a smaller amount of money several times, then say a large sum of money once. By framing the total costs as being something smaller, more people are likely to buy it. A great example of this is your subscription services. Very few people will sign on to a Netflix or Hulu subscription for $150/year, but have little to no problem paying $13/mo despite the irrationality. We see this routinely when a stock splits, investors unwilling to buy a single share at $1,000 have no problem buying 10 shares at $100. Framing can often be used to contaminate an investors relationship with risk. They will routinely buy and sell shares based on how the risk is framed. In fact, many investors will disproportionately reward high risk companies, higher valuations as a result of framing.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest