InSight

How to Prepare your company for the Close of the Plan Year and Welcome the New Year in Your 401(k) Plan

Financial Planning Dentist

As the current year draws to a close, plan sponsors overseeing 401(k) plans have several essential tasks to complete to ensure a smooth transition from the old plan year to the new one. This guide provides insights into what you can expect and how to prepare effectively for the upcoming year. With InSight, plan years align with the calendar year, making January 1 the starting point for the new plan year.

Before Year-End

Some elements of your tax mitigation and 401(k) planning strategy must be completed before the Dec 31st deadline. Consult your AIF®, CPA®, and CFP® today to make sure these are noted and can be completed by year-end:

Elect Final Contributions

For individuals with self-employed income, confirming owner’s draw elections by the December 31 deadline is essential, and this requirement extends to more than just owner’s draws. 

It also encompasses bonuses and other spot compensation that employees want to count in this year’s contributions. This deadline is significant because it impacts how these additional forms of income are allocated within the 401(k) plan. Even if participants intend to allocate these contributions to the following year for the current plan year, adhering to the December 31 deadline ensures that these funds are correctly accounted for and accounted for in the appropriate tax year. 

Bonuses and spot compensation, often received at year-end or sporadically, should not be excluded from 401(k) contributions. It’s crucial to communicate to plan participants that they have the opportunity to temporarily adjust their deferral rates via their dashboards before payroll processing, allowing them to make informed decisions about their retirement savings in light of these variable income sources. 

Timely compliance with these deadlines ensures transparency and accurate accounting of all forms of income within the 401(k) plan, promoting financial security for participants and regulatory compliance for plan sponsors.

Verify or Update Company Information

Begin by confirming that InSight and the recordkeeper have the most up-to-date and accurate information about your company’s owners and officers. You can achieve this by completing the company information task on your dashboard. If you’ve switched or plan to switch payroll providers, it’s crucial to inform us promptly.

Make sure to review your employee roster, ensuring it includes any new hires and employees who have left your organization.

Monitor Your Compliance Dashboard

Access your compliance dashboard to review projected compliance results via the Compliance Status section on your administrator dashboard. More on Compliance testing is found here.

It’s important to note that Safe Harbor 401(k) plans automatically meet most non-discrimination testing requirements. More on Safe Harbor 401(k) plans can be found here.

Understand End-of-Year Payroll and Annual Limits

Keep in mind that bonus payments cannot be excluded from 401(k) contributions, even if they are paid separately from regular payroll. If participants are due to receive a bonus, inform them that they can temporarily adjust their deferral rates via their dashboards before payroll processing, if desired. Employer nonelective contributions and matches will apply to bonus pay as usual.

All payrolls with a payment date on or after January 1 will count toward the next plan year’s contributions, regardless of when the work was performed. In the context of 401(k) plans, compensation is recognized when it’s actually paid, not when it’s earned. If any employees reach annual contribution limits before the year-end, their contributions may be capped by either your payroll provider or recordkeeper to prevent exceeding these limits.

When the New Year Begins

At the onset of the new plan year, you can expect to receive tasks within your administrator dashboard, guiding you on essential actions to take. Here are some tasks you may need or want to complete:

Report Compensation and Self-Employment Income

Reporting compensation and self-employment income in 401(k) plans holds paramount importance as it forms the foundation for fair and accurate retirement savings. This crucial step ensures that participants’ contributions and benefits align with their actual earnings, fostering equity within the plan. Accurate income reporting not only helps employees maximize their retirement savings but also aids plan administrators in complying with regulatory requirements. 

By meticulously documenting compensation and self-employment income, employers and plan sponsors can confidently navigate the complexities of 401(k) plan administration, contributing to the financial well-being of both the workforce and the organization as a whole.

Make Additional Employer Contributions with Profit Sharing

Making additional employer contributions with profit sharing is a strategic move that can significantly benefit both employers and employees within a 401(k) plan. This practice allows employers to share their company’s success directly with their workforce, fostering employee loyalty and motivation. It serves as an attractive incentive for employees to participate in the retirement plan, increasing overall plan engagement. 

From an employer’s perspective, profit sharing provides flexibility in contributing to retirement accounts while potentially enjoying tax advantages. It aligns the company’s prosperity with the financial well-being of its employees, creating a win-win scenario that strengthens the employer-employee relationship and enhances the long-term retirement security of the workforce.

Consider making additional employer contributions with profit sharing, enhancing the retirement benefits offered to your employees. Explore the advantages of profit sharing.

Address Required Nondiscrimination Test Failures

Addressing required nondiscrimination test failures in a 401(k) plan is a crucial step to maintaining fairness and compliance within the plan. These tests are designed to ensure that retirement benefits are distributed equitably among all employees and not skewed in favor of highly compensated individuals or business owners. 

When failures occur, it’s imperative to take corrective actions promptly as outlined by the IRS. By rectifying these issues, plan sponsors not only avoid potential penalties and legal complications but also uphold the core principle of retirement plans – providing a fair and equal opportunity for all employees to save for their future. Proactive resolution of nondiscrimination test failures not only safeguards the plan’s integrity but also fosters trust and confidence among plan participants, reinforcing the plan’s commitment to equitable retirement savings for everyone.

If your plan fails any mandatory nondiscrimination tests, be prepared to make the necessary corrections as outlined by the IRS.

 

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

Tax Mitigation Playbook: How much money do you have to reinvest?

In order to defer ALL capital gains and depreciation recapture taxes from the sale of the Relinquished Property the taxpayer must pay an equal or higher price for the Replacement Property than the Relinquished Property was sold. Should any debt or amount not be reinvested this portion, called boot, would be taxable. The “Boot” is any non-like-kind property or property(ies) that do not qualify, which could include cash, notes, partnership interests, securities, inventory, or property held primarily for sale not investment, etc. Boot is categorized into two types: cash boot, which is cash received, and mortgage boot, which is any reduction in loan or debt on the exchange. Any boot received during a 1031 exchange is subject to taxation as either depreciation recapture or capital gain. It is important to note that any credits on the settlement statement directly paid out to the taxpayer may also result in boot and a taxable event. If certain situations are not handled properly in the construction and administration of the 1031 exchange it can result in credits on the settlement statement. Here are a couple of common situations: If earnest money is paid out of pocket by the taxpayer then it will be credited on the settlement statement. To avoid this, the earnest money should be paid by the qualified intermediary out of the exchange funds whenever possible. If the settlement statement shows credits for property taxes, security deposit(s), or rent prorations those would be taxable. Instead, the taxpayer should consider asking the seller to pay these items outside of the closing. In summary, to avoid a taxable event in its entirety the taxpayer must reinvest equal to or greater than the value of the sale of the Relinquished Property. However, the taxpayer may take cash out, creating boot, but they will have to pay the associated taxes. The Complete Playbook

Read More »
Boulder Investment Experts
Articles
Kevin Taylor

USA’s Credit Rating Downgraded – What it Means for the Economy and Lessons from the Past

USA’s Credit Rating Downgraded – What it Means for the Economy and Lessons from the Past The U.S. has had its 2nd downgrade in 12 years Equity and debt markets and the broader economy are highly correlated to the strength of U.S. Creditworthiness Politics and Debt Debates are wearing on credit agencies’ willingness to underwrite poor behavior and political infighting In a surprising turn of events, the credit rating of the United States has been downgraded to AA+ from AAA, a rating the U.S. has held at Fitch since 1994, signaling a potential cause for concern in the country’s financial stability. The downgrade comes as a result of several key factors that have raised worries among investors and financial experts. Expected Fiscal Deterioration: The downgrade reflects concerns about the future financial situation of the US over the next three years. Experts fear that the government’s ability to manage its finances may deteriorate, potentially leading to a higher risk of defaulting on its debt. Growing Debt Burden: Another significant issue is the increasing debt burden that the US has been facing. The government has been accumulating more debt, which raises questions about its ability to repay the money it has borrowed. Erosion of Governance: Over the past two decades, there has been a steady decline in the quality of governance in the US. This is evident in the way the government has repeatedly struggled to reach agreements on the debt limit, leading to last-minute resolutions. Such instability erodes confidence in the government’s fiscal management. The consequences of this downgrade could be far-reaching, impacting various aspects of the economy. One potential concern is that it might lead to a lack of confidence in US bonds, which are essential for the government to borrow money. If investors become skeptical about the government’s ability to pay back its debts, they may demand higher interest rates on US bonds, making it costlier for the government to borrow money. The US government’s deficit, which is the amount by which government spending exceeds its income, is expected to increase. In 2023, it is predicted to reach 6.3% of the country’s total economic output (GDP), which is quite high compared to previous years. By 2025, it might even widen further to 6.9% of GDP. Moreover, the level of debt compared to the size of the economy is projected to rise over the forecast period, reaching 118.4% of GDP by 2025. This level of debt is significantly higher than what is considered safe for countries with strong financial standings. One potential consequence of the downgrade is the risk of a mild recession in the US economy. Tighter credit conditions, weakening business investment, and slower consumption could lead to economic growth slowing down. This, in turn, may impact job opportunities and the overall well-being of the population. To address these issues, the US Federal Reserve has been raising interest rates. While this can help control inflation, it may also make borrowing money more expensive for businesses and consumers. The Federal Reserve faces the challenge of balancing economic growth with the need to manage inflation. It is important for the US government to take swift and effective action to address these financial challenges. Failure to do so could lead to more difficulties in the future and potentially impact the financial stability of the nation. Despite the downgrade, the US still possesses some strengths that support its financial standing. Its large, advanced, and diversified economy, coupled with the US dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency, provides the government with exceptional financing flexibility. In August 2011, a similar event occurred when Standard & Poor’s (S&P) downgraded the credit rating of the United States from AAA to AA+. This had significant effects on financial markets and the overall economy: Market Turmoil: The downgrade triggered widespread market turmoil. Stock markets experienced sharp declines, and investors panicked as they worried about the stability of the US economy and its ability to repay its debts. Increased Volatility: Financial markets became more volatile in the wake of the downgrade. Investors became uncertain about the future, leading to wild swings in asset prices and increased risk aversion. Higher Borrowing Costs: The downgrade led to increased borrowing costs for the US government. As investors perceived the risk of holding US government debt to be higher, they demanded higher yields on US Treasury bonds. This, in turn, increased the interest payments that the government had to make on its debt, putting additional strain on the budget. Impact on Consumer Confidence: The downgrade had a negative impact on consumer confidence. When people see negative news about the economy, they become more cautious about their spending and saving habits, potentially leading to decreased consumer spending, which is a significant driver of economic growth. Weakened Dollar: The US dollar, which had long been considered a safe-haven currency, faced pressure due to the downgrade. As investors sought safer alternatives, the value of the dollar depreciated against other currencies. Impact on Global Markets: The downgrade had ripple effects on global financial markets. Many countries and institutions around the world hold US Treasury bonds as part of their investment portfolios, and the downgrade caused concern about the stability of these holdings. Political Fallout: The downgrade also led to political fallout within the US. It intensified debates and disagreements among policymakers about how to address the country’s fiscal challenges and reduce its debt burden. It’s worth noting that while the 2011 downgrade had significant short-term effects on financial markets, the US economy eventually recovered. However, it serves as a reminder of the importance of fiscal responsibility and prudent financial management to maintain investor confidence and economic stability. Addressing the challenges posed by the downgrade requires swift and effective action by the US government. Measures to control debt, improve governance, and foster sustainable economic growth are essential to restore investor confidence. Despite the downgrade, the US still possesses strengths, including a large and advanced economy, and the status of the US dollar as the world’s primary

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest