Obituary: the 60/40 Portfolio

Financial Planning Dentist

The 60/40 portfolio was born in 1952 in Chicago, IL to Harry Markowitz. It received widespread adoption in the investment community and Nobel Prize accolades. The practice of balancing the correlation between stocks and bonds has died; on March 23rd, 2020. It is survived by a whirlwind of speculation, hedging, and general uncertainty. In lieu of flowers, please send condolences to the risk adverse.

If you are familiar with the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio, you know it is largely a relic of the past. For most investors, alternatives and derivatives are likely to become a bigger portion of investors’ portfolios over the next decade. But for decades, investors would reliably count on exposure to 60% stock market equities and 40% bonds to create predictability and smooth out the stock market’s volatility. All with the hope they could still meet retirement goals. This is no longer the case.

Cause of Death

The cause death is not entirely clear, though there are several compounding maladies:

Age: While in its youth the 60/40 performed admirably in its ability to predictably drive income through the ebb and flow of the market. Constantly providing investors with assets in a favorable asset class to be selling, and in turn working additional capital into an out of favor class. The whole process worked swimmingly shifting money back and forth and ever higher. But as this process aged it no longer kept up with changes to the economy. A relentless expansion of the national balance sheet and synchronized expansion money in the supply has eroded the health and reliability of the “40” side of the portfolio and has caused investors to seek higher and higher levels of risks from bonds to accommodate the falling returns. 

With little to no reprieve from the declining health of bonds, and a limited upside in returns, the predictability of the 60/40 has been questionable as of late. Nothing is more emblematic of this then the current bond markets – in the high yield space debt is priced with almost no accounting for default risks – meaning more money is chasing falling yields and leaving discerning investors to question the urgency. Simultaneously, the negative and near zero rates on treasuries are punishing the most conservative investors. This means the entire bond structure is distorted by the seemingly endless printing of money.

Purpose: The 60/40 portfolio was supposed to insulate investors when markets turned sour. Providing a reduction in overall volatility and replacing it with a predictable and stable trajectory. As investors are demanding more and more internal rate of return to meet their investment objective they are either assuming more and more risk without compensation.  Or they’re seeking alternatives that require private equity, hedging, real estate, and complexity to fabricate a stable return and lowered risk. 

Regarding the risk return balance, investors have been seeking more and more risk for their returns by either pushing dollars into the higher risk bond (as noted above) or out of bonds entirely. Many are finding that to secure their retirement expectations they are going to simply abandon the 60/40 for a higher admixture or equities. And with little or no negative impact for taking on that risk they are seemingly fine running their portfolio hot. 

In comes alternatives, which has been described as one of the next big trends to cultivate the desired returns for investors. Even Vanguard, a company rooted in the success of the everyday investor, began exploring alternatives, launching a private-equity fund in 2019. This will pose new challenges for mainstream investors who are categorically poor at pricing this unconventional asset class. This could mean that returns will be impacted by fund flows. With the addition of retail investors to the Vanguard platform a systemic pushing up of prices will lower returns for both retail and institutional investors. It will also cause another market where too much money is chasing too few assets.

COVID-19: Correlation between asset classes has long been the lynchpin in making the 60/40 (and other Modern Portfolio Theory) concepts work. But as the correlation between bond prices and stock prices are moving in closer and closer lockstep, the advantages of correction are diminishing. No point in time was that more apparent then the sell off in March of every asset class. The volatility seen in stock, bonds and even precious metals during that time showed there is no longer a predictable flight to safety mentality that would give investors an out. 

Correlation Psychology: Part of this correlation between historically oppositional asset classes comes down to the psychology of the investors. Investors are now, possibly more than they were historically, hypnotized by the returns of the capital markets. So when confronted with a low risk low return asset class like the bond market as a whole they will simply take their money into equities, causing them to invest their bond money with the same reactionary mindset that they invest their equity money. This is causing the both stock and bond markets to become sensitive to emotion and the news cycle like never before.  

Distortion of risk and “bailouts”: As we have seen and continue to see governments around the world are ready and willing to bail out capital markets. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the United States. There the practice of supporting financial markets with added liquidity is having a two fold effect that erodes correlation. It is rewarding the riskiest investments like equities; and by printing money it’s adding more supply to bonds while driving yields lower. Essentially, this practice is borrowing risk compensation from bonds to create a floor for equities.

Exchange Traded Funds: While there is fantastic value in the vehicle it is limited to equities. See while a fund that contributes more assets to a company with a growing market cap created a virtuous cycle in equities, in bond it creates a bubble. By weighting and ETFs net exposure based on market cap it means the companies that borrow more, get more money…imagine that in your personal finances. If you are familiar with borrowing money, you will find that the more money you have borrowed, the less likely a bank will lend you an additional line. But in the ETF’s the more they borrow, the more their bonds are bought, causing the yield to go down, while the risk is increasing. This is inverse to our expectations for bonds. 


Efforts to resuscitate:

It is unclear whether efforts to bring the 60/40 back to life will be effective, but it is certain it will not happen while the risk premiums on bonds are at these low levels. Until there is a proper reward paid to investors who are patient, cash flow centric, and discerning, there will be no change to the 60/40’s condition. Changes are being made to provide investors with an alternative, including owning real estate, using options, or exposing clients to insurance and other derivative products to secure a stable predictable return.

More related articles:

Kevin Taylor

The coming distress in office real estate and how to make the most of it

The squeeze in commercial real estate in the office group is causing a challenging situation faced by owners of office buildings who need to refinance their loans amid a record-high vacancy period. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many businesses have shifted to remote work, which has led to a decrease in demand for office space. This has caused vacancy rates in commercial real estate to reach record highs in many cities. When owners of commercial properties need to refinance their loans, they must provide proof of occupancy rates and rental income to lenders. With the high vacancy rates, it may be difficult for owners to meet the lender’s requirements, which could lead to higher interest rates or even the inability to secure financing. The cost of borrowing money in the US has gone up a lot in the past year. This has caused big problems for banks and could cause problems for owners of commercial real estate, which means buildings used for businesses. They might have trouble getting new loans to pay for old ones that are due soon. A lot of money, almost $450 billion, is due to be paid back in 2023. This is happening because the Federal Reserve, which is a group that controls the money in the US, raised the cost of borrowing money from almost nothing to 5%, which is the biggest increase in a long time. With nearly $450 billion in commercial real-estate debt set to mature in 2023 – meaning a final payment on those loans are due, per data cited from Trepp by JPMorgan. This situation may cause a fire sale in the commercial real estate market because more distressed sellers may enter the market, looking to offload their properties quickly. This increase in supply, coupled with decreased demand, may lead to a drop in property values and lower selling prices.   What does this mean for investors in traditional REITs and Real Estate Mutual Funds: A vicious cycle can occur in mutual funds and real estate investment trusts (REIT) within the fund underperforms, leading investors to redeem their shares. This can cause a chain reaction where more and more investors exit the mutual fund or the REIT, which can lead to a further decline in performance. When a mutual fund invests in a REIT, it purchases shares in a company that owns and manages real estate assets. The performance of the REIT depends on the value of these assets and the ability of the company to generate income from them. If the assets decline in value or the company is unable to generate sufficient income, the REIT’s performance may suffer. If the REIT underperforms, investors may become dissatisfied with the mutual fund’s overall returns and may choose to redeem their shares. This can cause a reduction in the assets under management of the mutual fund, which may force the fund manager to sell off some of the REIT shares to meet the redemption requests. If this selling pressure exceeds the demand for the REIT shares, it can further decrease the value of the shares, causing more investors to redeem their shares and leading to a further decline in performance. This cycle of poor performance, redemptions, and a further decline in performance can continue until the mutual fund or the REIT is no longer viable, and the investment is liquidated. To avoid this cycle, investors should carefully evaluate the performance of the REIT within the mutual fund and consider the long-term potential of the underlying real estate assets before investing. Additionally, investors should have a long-term investment horizon and avoid making impulsive investment decisions based on short-term market movements.   It’s already having an effect on one of the most high-profile REITs Currently, Blackstone has suspended the redemption program for BREIT, meaning that investors are unable to sell their shares at this time. This decision was made in response to the economic uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, as Blackstone believed that selling assets in the current market would result in losses for investors. The effect of this decision is that investors who were planning to redeem their shares in the near future will have to wait until the redemption program resumes. This could cause financial hardship for some investors who may have relied on these funds for liquidity or other financial obligations. However, it’s worth noting that the suspension of the redemption program is a temporary measure, and Blackstone has stated that they will resume redemptions as soon as they believe it is in the best interest of investors. In the meantime, investors can continue to receive dividends from their shares in BREIT, which may provide some financial relief. What does this mean for the coming “Fire sale” on Office Properties? Furthermore, as more distressed sellers enter the market, it could create a downward spiral in property values, leading to further distress in the market. This could cause lenders to tighten their lending criteria even further, making it even more difficult for owners to refinance their loans. If there is a fire sale in office properties in 2024 and 2025, prepared investors may be able to take advantage of the situation by following these strategies: Be Ready with Cash: Prepared investors should have cash available to take advantage of the potential buying opportunity. With cash in hand, investors can quickly make an offer on a property and close the deal without the need for financing. Conduct Due Diligence: Before investing in any property, it’s important to conduct thorough due diligence. This involves analyzing the property’s financial performance, tenant mix, location, and potential for appreciation. Prepared investors should conduct their due diligence in advance so that they are ready to move quickly when the opportunity arises. Look for Distressed Assets: A fire sale often involves distressed assets, which are properties that are being sold due to financial difficulties. Prepared investors should look for distressed assets that have the potential for appreciation and can be turned around with some investment and management. Negotiate a Good Price: In a fire sale, the

Read More »
Investing 101
Peter Locke

Investing 101

If you’re lucky enough to have previously started investing in your teens consider yourself way ahead of the curve. For the majority of people Investing 101 is for you. Most of us start investing in our mid to late 20s, but for those that start as early as possible can set themselves up for an incredibly lucrative future. Where should you start for Investing 101? There are a couple of places that will have the largest impact on your net worth. If, let’s say you have a summer job and you’re making $5,000-$10,000 a summer or you’re working throughout the year then opening an investment account is a great place to start.  For us, saving anyway in any type of account is great. While we like all accounts for different reasons, we like the Roth IRA the most when you’re young. A Roth IRA is like a bank account with different advantages. It enables you to save money that you’ve already paid taxes on and those savings grow tax free until you turn age 59.5 penalty free. Now we love the Roth IRA because typically when you’re young your income is fairly low so taking advantage of low tax rates is a great strategy.  Since you’ll be in the lowest tax bracket in 2020 (things may change in 2021) then paying taxes now for your money to grow tax free for multiple decades can have a profound impact on your wealth. The reason is called compounding growth. Let’s say you make it very easy on yourself and just buy into the SP500. It’s an index that tracks the 500 largest companies and you can invest in all of them using one investment vehicle. Let’s break Investing 101 down. A stock is a way to own a part of a company. An Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) is a basket of stocks that give investors exposure to typically hundreds of companies. Since you cannot buy an index like the Dow Jones, SP500, or Nasdaq (different indices) directly, you have to buy a vehicle that gives you exposure to them. That vehicle can be a ETF, which is usually a less expensive and passively managed investing vehicle when compared to a Mutual Fund. A Mutual Fund (MF) is a basket of stocks just like an ETF that is more actively managed and usually more expensive way to gain exposure to the same stocks. The difference being whether or not you think someone can actively outperform the index (MF) or you just want general exposure to the index (ETF). You can argue both sides so do what makes you feel comfortable. ETFs and MFs have different tax obligations but this isn’t as big of a concern until you’re in higher tax brackets.  If picking stocks is difficult, you aren’t interested in it, or you just want things to be more simple, investing in ETFs is an incredible way to bring you long term wealth.  ETFs and MFs typically pay what’s called a dividend. This dividend is like a thank you from the company for investing in that company. It’s a cash payment to you, typically quarterly, that you can use to reinvest back into your ETF or MF, a new stock, or whatever else.  Think about your investment portfolio like a business. This is the core to Investing 101. Your business takes money and hopefully makes you money. When you make more money you either spend it on yourself or put it back into the company. When you put it back into the company the company grows and makes you more and more money over time. This is a great way to think about investing in an ETF or MF. Every quarter, without you having to work at all, your fund is paying you and you can reinvest that money to grow your portfolio more and more.  Wealth isn’t created overnight. The secret to wealth is long term saving and investing. Hence, those that have time on their side have the greatest ability to accumulate wealth. So what else should you be thinking about?  After investing in yourself first, think about where else you spend your money. We wrote an article on the difference between erosive and accretive debt. If you find yourself buying lots of clothes, expensive shoes, fancy gadgets, and new cars then you’re not investing in your “portfolio business”. When you stop investing in your business you stop growing. Each time you do this the effect is compounded.  For example, if you invested $1,000 and $100 monthly for 40 years at 9% interest rate (average gain of the SP500) you would have ~$436,000 at the end. But let’s say you invested $1,000 upfront and only $50 monthly over the same time period and same interest rate, you’d have ~$234,000! That is a massive difference for only $50. That could be one meal out for you and your significant other, one new shirt you liked that you didn’t need, a car payment on a new car because you didn’t want a used car.

Read More »

Large savings account but not ready to buy a home yet, options?

This may be the most difficult time for savers looking to buy a home. As interest rates have plummeted making it more affordable to buy your home, it has decreased what you can earn in a savings account to pretty much 0%.  With that being said, depending on your time frame you have a couple of options. If you’re planning on buying a home within the next 1-2 years the best option you have is buying a US Treasury (.9% as I write this) or an investment-grade corporate bond (1.3%). You cannot afford to start investing and lose 10-30% of your savings for the hope of a small increase in a good investment. So understanding risk vs. reward is key.  If you’re planning on purchasing a home in more than 2-3 years then you could theoretically invest this money in a more passive way either by investing some money again in a corporate bond or US Treasury and complement it with a total stock market ETF. How much you invest in both depends on your timeframe but the more you invest in equities the more volatility your savings will become.  Alternatively, you could invest in a bond ladder. For example, buy a 1-year bond, a 2-year bond, and a 3-year bond. As interest rates potentially increase, your bonds will mature and you will have cash available to reinvest in a bond with maybe a higher interest rate that matures when you need it to purchase your home.  If you’re looking to buy a home in 3-5 years then you can invest a little more aggressively; however, it will be important to reduce your equity exposure as you get about 1 year out.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest