InSight

Market InSights:

Second COVID-19 Stimulus Niceties and Notes

We have an agreement, which means we can begin to criticize it and plan for the investment and economic effects. The bill is a litany of half measures, no long term solutions, and likely sets up a couple of battles in the next congress. 

Congress punted on evictions, postponing medical payments until early next year, and there is still an ongoing debate regarding the amount it is issuing in direct payments. The looming liability concern for businesses is still being discussed.

Here is what got done: 

Individual payments for many

Easily the most asked about part of the legislation is the direct payment to individuals that begin going out today. The passed version included $600 going to individual adults with an adjusted gross income of up to $75,000 a year based on 2019 earnings.

An increased amount will be going to those that file as heads of households who earn up to $112,500 and couples (or someone whose spouse died in 2020) who make up to $150,000 a year would get twice that amount.

This continuing political battle to raise this number from $600 to $2000 is still going on today, passing with all democrat and some republican support in the house. The senate is questionable as a few Republicans have endorsed the idea, including the two high profile candidates in Georgia – Loeffler, and Purdue.

McConnell has blocked the bill as of 10:20 am as I am writing this article. 

Unemployment benefits

With almost 7% of Americans still unemployed and millions more under-employed, Congress acted to extend multiple programs to help those out of work, albeit at less generous levels than in the spring. Too much of the surprise of those tracking the issue, the final bill doesn’t include the expanded coffers many anticipated and is considered a skinny agreement. 

The agreement would include:

  • 11 weeks, providing a lifeline for hard-hit workers until March 14. 
  • Up to $300 per week (half the amount provided by the original stimulus bill in the spring)
  • Pandemic Unemployment Assistance — a program aimed at a broad set of freelancers and independent contractors — for the same period, providing an additional $100 per week

Better late than never, the expanded agreement is a second band-aid for those Americans that continue to seek employment as employers have halted hiring. The near term negative effect of unemployment cannot be understated. But as we look out to the intermediate (6 months) range seems to hold a fantastic capacity for consumers to unwind pent up spending in short order. The unemployment insurance isn’t expected to be much but will support many Americans who put more and more spending on credit cards in the second half of the year. 

Funds for Child Care, Schools, and Colleges

School budgets have been uniquely impacted by the pandemic and have left their outlook for the year to some impaired:

  • $82 billion for education and education service providers, 
  • That figure includes $54 billion for stabilizing K-12 schools
  • It also includes $23 billion for colleges and universities
  • $10 billion for the child care industry

K-12 schools saw more support than the initial package in dollar terms, and even more than the proposed package in November; however, the funds still fall short of what both sectors say they need to blunt the effect of the pandemic and to support operations in 2021. 

The majority of school districts transitioned to remote learning and as a result, we were asked to make expensive adjustments to accommodate while seeing enrollment drops upend budgets. Colleges and universities are also facing financial constraints amid rising expenses and falling revenue.

Child care centers that are struggling with reduced enrollment or closures will get help to stay open and continue paying their staff. The funds are also supposed to help families struggling with tuition payments for early childhood education. 

Funding for broadband infrastructure

The stress on national broadband has been higher than ever, remote work and education on top of the expanded requirements of technologies like Zoom, have put a major strain on national networks. The legislation includes $7 billion for expanding access to high-speed internet connections. Much of this spending was anticipated in an infrastructure bill, that has been brought forward as a result of the pandemic. Two major points in this part:

  • Half this stimulus is earmarked to cover the cost of monthly internet bills by providing up to $50 per month to low-income families.
  • $300 million for building out infrastructure in underserved rural areas and $1 billion in grants for tribal broadband programs. (Part of another infrastructure bills spending prior to the pandemic) 

Extension of aid for small businesses (PPP)

The bill puts forward $285 billion for additional loans to small businesses under the Paycheck Protection Program. This renews the program created under the initial stimulus legislation and is largely an extension of dollars that were repurposed.

Funding for vaccines and eldercare facilities

The source of concern early in the pandemic and the ongoing requirements to overhaul the elderly care facilities are addressed by this legislation as it sets aside nearly $70 billion for a range of public health measures targeted at elderly care facilities and the distribution of the vaccine. This breakdown includes: 

  • $20 billion for the purchase of vaccines 
  • $8 billion for vaccine distribution 
  • $20 billion to help states continue their test-and-trace program
  • Earmarked funds to cover emergency loans aimed at helping hard-hit eldercare centers.

A ban on surprise medical bills

The Bill supports efforts to help Americans avoid unexpected medical bills that can result from visits to hospitals. The legislation also makes it illegal for hospitals to charge patients for services like emergency treatment by out-of-network doctors or transport in air ambulances, which patients often have no say about. This measure has had some long time support from Democrats and was criticized for not including some provision in the Affordable Care Act. 

Rental protections

One more month of halting evictions is pushed out to the end of January. The Department of Housing and Urban Development separately issued a similar moratorium on Monday that protects homeowners against foreclosures on mortgages backed by the Federal Home Administration. It runs until Feb. 28. This has had several enforcement issues and while the legislation is a fantastic lipservice, the issues of evictions for individuals with a history of rental disqualification from before the pandemic are a continued source of evictions.

The bill DOES NOT include liability protection for business

A criticism by many that Democrats largely held out a provision for liability protection for companies trying to reopen. This element, opposed by labor unions and supported by the national Chamber of Commerce was a sticking point that went without inclusion. The discussion was important because it would allow businesses to follow their local recommendations to reopen to have legal insolation from lawsuits later on. This will continue to be a discussion in congress as a “reopen” is structured and the liabilities for business owners regarding COVID exposures are defined. 

Conclusion:

This gets us through the winter and hopefully the hump of COVID as the vaccine gets rolled out. It still leaves too much for the 2021 congress to cover and cover quickly. What the continued political, monetary, and fiscal landscape reactions look like is still up for debate. The curvature of risk in equities peaks in February (as I write this) so markets are pricing in a 2 month include equities and a political battle come early spring.

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

Let Bitcoin Fail

Let Bitcoin Fail Before it becomes, too big to fail also. The Federal Reserve and Treasury need to establish a better policy regarding their role and behavior when Bitcoin fails. Continued ‘bailout’ for speculative players in the market has a critical and damning effect on the rest of us. Taxpayers have already lived through the negative economic and social impacts of watching banks and speculators who took on unjustified risks get reimbursed for their recklessness once this century. Watching banks stash and store cryptocurrencies under the same speculative bubble is foreboding. The U.S. simply cannot afford to bail out speculators who have driven the market of Bitcoin past $1T with no concern for uninsured assets. It is already bad enough that U.S. financial regulators have proven to be ill-equipped to enforce current AML and BSA policies in the wake of crypto adoptions. Financial institutions’ exposure to the crypto-asset industry is affecting their bank’s anti-money laundering compliance and oversight and several years’ worth of infractions are piling up at some of the nation’s biggest banks. Additionally, several of the ‘online’ banks that are continuing to offer crypto-trading as part of their expanded services are doing so without the proper due diligence and vetting of their counterparties. Market regulators aren’t watching closely to see how financial institutions’ exposure to the crypto-asset industry is affecting their banks’ anti-money laundering and compliance. As the broader public becomes more interested in crypto assets, some bank customers are seeking ways to fund crypto trading. In this environment, banks need to assess how these activities are isolated from their current operations and be prepared to mitigate illicit finance risks emanating from these new assets. Additionally, the Fed and FDIC allowing high-risk speculative assets to be connected to U.S. currency is as irresponsible as the housing crisis demonstrated; and these Federal authorities need to make more clear that they will let this speculation fail or rise under its own power and that using taxpayers institutions to protect this asset is not in our best interest and a lesson in moral hazard that should eventually be learned. Suspend FDIC insurance for all banks that continue to mask their crypto-speculation with support and protection of the Fed and the FDIC Now.  Contagion is Spreading As major U.S. Banks are getting swept up into the asset bubble they are taking our oversight and insurance institutions with them. In February the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a cease and desist order to New York-based Safra Bank. In the order, the OCC cited that “the bank gave accounts to money service businesses (MSBs) that facilitated crypto-asset trading” but that the bank did not “address the increased Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) risks associated with these accounts.” While the OCC has caught this bank, the ecosystem of back offering these ‘crypto trading accounts’ is outpacing the oversight of the banks and regulators. Simply put – the market is growing beyond our ability to control, and U.S. banks supported by the Federal Reserve are connected to this exposure.   In the Safra Bank case, the bank allegedly did not have sufficient transaction monitoring systems in place in the onboarding process to confirm these new “digital asset customers” were legitimate and this caused its volume of domestic and international wires and ACH transfers to spike.  Unfortunately, the OCC has yet to specify the crypto-asset-focused companies involved with Safra’s breach of the KYC ecosystem.  Though the San Francisco Open Exchange (SFOX), has allowed SFOX traders to maintain FDIC-insured cash accounts at the bank. This is general incompetence and complacency that is allowing the crypto asset bubble to contaminate the federally insured accounts at other banks. Liquidity is Drying Up The world’s largest cryptocurrency, bitcoin sits just below $60,000 today, as the total market cap of BTC is above $1.1 trillion. Despite the recent price jump, there is a major concern BTC holders and even non-speculators should be aware of. That is the liquidity of Bitcoin. JP Morgan’s strategist Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou writes “the market liquidity in Bitcoin is significantly lower than S&P 500 and gold.” Panigirtzoglou adds that “even a small change in Bitcoin flows can have a large impact on the price of BTC.” The liquidity issue is driving up the speculative costs of bitcoin but should be a major concern for those that purport the BTC is some kind of store of capital. Low liquidity will have a negative impact on the rash of new Bitcoin lending schemes that are proliferating in the market. Several new companies are offering interest on bitcoin deposits made possible by lending out those coins to speculative investors. As the underlying price of bitcoin rises out of control the borrowers become less and less likely to return the borrowed coin (almost an impossible default rate to handicap). These defaults, coupled with the lack of liquidity, will make it almost impossible for borrowers to cover. If this ‘bank run’ scenario were to play out in cash the Fed can step in to increase liquidity and control interest rates, and the FDIC can insure the lenders against defaults and make them whole. There is no such protection for Bitcoin lenders.   Low Reputation Counter Parties The crypto market has still yet to solve its illegal and illicit underbelly. While widespread adoption is making for more legitimate transactions, it is similarly eroding the capacity of regulators and compliance officers to confirm they are not transacting with corrupting counterparties. While making the ecosystem ‘bigger’ lowers the percentage of bad actors, it also increases their space to hide among legitimate actors. Criminals who keep their funds in cryptocurrency tend to launder funds through a small cluster of online services that exist outside of regulator authority. Essentially saying, banks and speculators are doing business with criminals (if done in dollars is criminal also) but because it’s done in crypto it is willfully existing outside the law. Services like high-risk (low-reputation) crypto-exchange portals, online gambling platforms, cryptocurrency mixing services, and financial services

Read More »
real estate investing, boulder Colorado financial planning,
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Location one of the six critical factors in real estate investing

Investing in real estate can be a lucrative way to build wealth, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all approach. One of the most critical factors to consider before investing in real estate is location. Hence the adage “location, location, location!!!” Anticipating location in real estate involves identifying up-and-coming areas before they become popular and investing in properties in those locations. This requires research into economic and population trends, as well as an understanding of the local real estate market. Anticipating location can be a savvy strategy for real estate investors, as it can lead to higher property value appreciation and cash flow potential. However, it also requires a certain level of risk-taking, as investing in a location before it becomes popular can be uncertain. Nevertheless, anticipating location is an important skill for real estate investors to develop in order to stay ahead of the curve and maximize their investment returns. Location is key because it can determine the property’s potential value, cash flow, and overall return on investment. Here are a few reasons why location is an essential factor to consider before investing in real estate: Value Appreciation Potential Location is a major factor in property value appreciation. Real estate values are heavily influenced by the desirability of the location. Properties in desirable locations typically appreciate faster and have a higher resale value than those in less desirable locations. A prime location is one where demand is high, such as close to major employment centers, good schools, shopping centers, and entertainment hubs. Investing in property in a prime location ensures that your investment will appreciate over time. Cash Flow Potential The location of the property plays a significant role in determining the cash flow potential of the investment. For rental properties, a good location can mean the difference between high occupancy rates and a high vacancy rate. A desirable location can also command higher rents, which can increase your cash flow. Conversely, investing in a property in a less desirable location could result in lower rental income and higher vacancy rates. Ease of Property Management The location of the property also impacts the ease of property management. For example, if you’re investing in a rental property, you’ll need to consider the location’s proximity to the property and your ability to manage it effectively. Investing in a property that is close to your home or office can make it easier to manage and respond to issues promptly. Economic Trends Economic trends, such as job growth and population growth, can have a significant impact on real estate values. Investing in a location with a robust economy and population growth can mean a better chance of property value appreciation and increased demand for rental properties. Resale Potential Lastly, the location of the property can impact its resale potential. Properties in desirable locations tend to sell faster and at a higher price than those in less desirable locations. Investing in a property in a prime location ensures that you have a better chance of a profitable resale in the future. Location is a top three critical factor to consider before investing in real estate. It affects the property’s potential value appreciation, cash flow, ease of management, economic trends, and resale potential. By investing in a prime location, you increase your chances of realizing a good return on investment and building long-term wealth.

Read More »
credit card
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Asset Borrowing in Self Directed IRA and Roth’s

Like getting a mortgage on a home, borrowing inside of a Self Directed IRA (SDRIA) can help add leverage, expand the upside of an investment and pose undue risks. It should only be used as part of a greater investment strategy coordinated by a CFP® or CPA®. Most borrowing in a SDIRA is for the purchase of real estate or a business inside of a tax advantaged account. Borrowing can make some assets more accessible to investors, and the upside and cash flow is often a fantastic endowment for any retirement strategy. An important note: interest payments made from a SDIRA are not tax deductible and you should note that in your investment calculations. Finding an working with a lender is also as important as vetting the investment and any other partner involved in the investment. We prefer using banks and other institutional lenders to limit risk and provide continuity. Please consult the InSight property acquisition process for more details on both borrowing and buying real estate. There are restrictions that you should be aware of from the outset that will help make having debt in the Self Directed IRA or Roth’s easier.  You cannot borrow money from yourself Understand prohibited counterparties The loan must be in your IRA’s name You can’t sign a personal guarantee You can’t pay off the loan with personal funds The debt must be non-recourse The debt service should be covered by monthly income at a rate of +1x (ideally, +1.15x) Be aware of any other conditions that are required by the lender If the above conditions do not compromise the investment strategy in the account, then borrowing inside of a Self Directed IRA might be the right fit for you. How using debt in your InSight-Full® financial plan is up to you and your CFP®. 

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest