InSight

Market InSights:

Second COVID-19 Stimulus Niceties and Notes

We have an agreement, which means we can begin to criticize it and plan for the investment and economic effects. The bill is a litany of half measures, no long term solutions, and likely sets up a couple of battles in the next congress. 

Congress punted on evictions, postponing medical payments until early next year, and there is still an ongoing debate regarding the amount it is issuing in direct payments. The looming liability concern for businesses is still being discussed.

Here is what got done: 

Individual payments for many

Easily the most asked about part of the legislation is the direct payment to individuals that begin going out today. The passed version included $600 going to individual adults with an adjusted gross income of up to $75,000 a year based on 2019 earnings.

An increased amount will be going to those that file as heads of households who earn up to $112,500 and couples (or someone whose spouse died in 2020) who make up to $150,000 a year would get twice that amount.

This continuing political battle to raise this number from $600 to $2000 is still going on today, passing with all democrat and some republican support in the house. The senate is questionable as a few Republicans have endorsed the idea, including the two high profile candidates in Georgia – Loeffler, and Purdue.

McConnell has blocked the bill as of 10:20 am as I am writing this article. 

Unemployment benefits

With almost 7% of Americans still unemployed and millions more under-employed, Congress acted to extend multiple programs to help those out of work, albeit at less generous levels than in the spring. Too much of the surprise of those tracking the issue, the final bill doesn’t include the expanded coffers many anticipated and is considered a skinny agreement. 

The agreement would include:

  • 11 weeks, providing a lifeline for hard-hit workers until March 14. 
  • Up to $300 per week (half the amount provided by the original stimulus bill in the spring)
  • Pandemic Unemployment Assistance — a program aimed at a broad set of freelancers and independent contractors — for the same period, providing an additional $100 per week

Better late than never, the expanded agreement is a second band-aid for those Americans that continue to seek employment as employers have halted hiring. The near term negative effect of unemployment cannot be understated. But as we look out to the intermediate (6 months) range seems to hold a fantastic capacity for consumers to unwind pent up spending in short order. The unemployment insurance isn’t expected to be much but will support many Americans who put more and more spending on credit cards in the second half of the year. 

Funds for Child Care, Schools, and Colleges

School budgets have been uniquely impacted by the pandemic and have left their outlook for the year to some impaired:

  • $82 billion for education and education service providers, 
  • That figure includes $54 billion for stabilizing K-12 schools
  • It also includes $23 billion for colleges and universities
  • $10 billion for the child care industry

K-12 schools saw more support than the initial package in dollar terms, and even more than the proposed package in November; however, the funds still fall short of what both sectors say they need to blunt the effect of the pandemic and to support operations in 2021. 

The majority of school districts transitioned to remote learning and as a result, we were asked to make expensive adjustments to accommodate while seeing enrollment drops upend budgets. Colleges and universities are also facing financial constraints amid rising expenses and falling revenue.

Child care centers that are struggling with reduced enrollment or closures will get help to stay open and continue paying their staff. The funds are also supposed to help families struggling with tuition payments for early childhood education. 

Funding for broadband infrastructure

The stress on national broadband has been higher than ever, remote work and education on top of the expanded requirements of technologies like Zoom, have put a major strain on national networks. The legislation includes $7 billion for expanding access to high-speed internet connections. Much of this spending was anticipated in an infrastructure bill, that has been brought forward as a result of the pandemic. Two major points in this part:

  • Half this stimulus is earmarked to cover the cost of monthly internet bills by providing up to $50 per month to low-income families.
  • $300 million for building out infrastructure in underserved rural areas and $1 billion in grants for tribal broadband programs. (Part of another infrastructure bills spending prior to the pandemic) 

Extension of aid for small businesses (PPP)

The bill puts forward $285 billion for additional loans to small businesses under the Paycheck Protection Program. This renews the program created under the initial stimulus legislation and is largely an extension of dollars that were repurposed.

Funding for vaccines and eldercare facilities

The source of concern early in the pandemic and the ongoing requirements to overhaul the elderly care facilities are addressed by this legislation as it sets aside nearly $70 billion for a range of public health measures targeted at elderly care facilities and the distribution of the vaccine. This breakdown includes: 

  • $20 billion for the purchase of vaccines 
  • $8 billion for vaccine distribution 
  • $20 billion to help states continue their test-and-trace program
  • Earmarked funds to cover emergency loans aimed at helping hard-hit eldercare centers.

A ban on surprise medical bills

The Bill supports efforts to help Americans avoid unexpected medical bills that can result from visits to hospitals. The legislation also makes it illegal for hospitals to charge patients for services like emergency treatment by out-of-network doctors or transport in air ambulances, which patients often have no say about. This measure has had some long time support from Democrats and was criticized for not including some provision in the Affordable Care Act. 

Rental protections

One more month of halting evictions is pushed out to the end of January. The Department of Housing and Urban Development separately issued a similar moratorium on Monday that protects homeowners against foreclosures on mortgages backed by the Federal Home Administration. It runs until Feb. 28. This has had several enforcement issues and while the legislation is a fantastic lipservice, the issues of evictions for individuals with a history of rental disqualification from before the pandemic are a continued source of evictions.

The bill DOES NOT include liability protection for business

A criticism by many that Democrats largely held out a provision for liability protection for companies trying to reopen. This element, opposed by labor unions and supported by the national Chamber of Commerce was a sticking point that went without inclusion. The discussion was important because it would allow businesses to follow their local recommendations to reopen to have legal insolation from lawsuits later on. This will continue to be a discussion in congress as a “reopen” is structured and the liabilities for business owners regarding COVID exposures are defined. 

Conclusion:

This gets us through the winter and hopefully the hump of COVID as the vaccine gets rolled out. It still leaves too much for the 2021 congress to cover and cover quickly. What the continued political, monetary, and fiscal landscape reactions look like is still up for debate. The curvature of risk in equities peaks in February (as I write this) so markets are pricing in a 2 month include equities and a political battle come early spring.

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

The Declining Faith in European Pensions and Its Impact on US Investment Markets

As young Europeans increasingly lose faith in the solvency of their governments’ pension systems, a significant shift in global investment patterns is emerging. This trend, driven by economic uncertainties and demographic challenges in Europe, is leading to a surge of investment flows into the US markets, positioning American companies as key beneficiaries of this financial migration. Declining Trust in European Pension Systems Several factors contribute to the growing skepticism among young Europeans regarding the future of their pensions. A primary concern is the demographic shift towards an aging population. According to Eurostat, the old-age dependency ratio in the European Union is projected to increase from 31% in 2019 to 57% by 2100, placing enormous pressure on public pension systems. This demographic imbalance means fewer workers will be supporting more retirees, raising doubts about the sustainability of state-funded pensions. Economic uncertainties also play a crucial role. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing financial strains on European governments, leading to increased public debt and budget deficits. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) highlighted that public debt in the euro area surged to 97% of GDP in 2021, up from 83% in 2019. These economic challenges have intensified concerns about the ability of governments to fulfill their long-term pension commitments. Additionally, political instability in several European countries has further eroded confidence. For instance, countries like Italy, Spain, and Greece have faced significant political turmoil in recent years, impacting their economic policies and adding to the uncertainty about the future of pension systems. Young Europeans’ Response to Pension Uncertainty The response of young Europeans to these pension concerns has been a marked shift in investment behavior. Many are seeking more reliable and potentially lucrative investment opportunities outside of Europe. According to a 2024 survey by the European Commission, 60% of young Europeans (aged 18-35) do not believe they will receive adequate pensions from their governments, prompting them to look for alternative retirement savings options. The US Stock Markets as an Investment Haven In this context, the US stock markets have emerged as a preferred destination for European investors. Several factors contribute to this trend: Robust Economic Performance: The US economy has shown remarkable resilience and growth potential, even amidst global uncertainties. The US Federal Reserve’s policies and strong corporate performance have bolstered investor confidence. Diversified Market Opportunities: The US markets offer a wide array of investment opportunities across various sectors, including technology, healthcare, and consumer goods. The dominance of US tech giants such as Apple, Amazon, and Google attracts international investors seeking growth and innovation. Stability and Regulatory Environment: The US regulatory framework is perceived as stable and investor-friendly. This stability, combined with the transparency and liquidity of US financial markets, makes them an attractive option for foreign investors. Increasing Investment Flows into US Markets The influx of European investment into US markets is already noticeable. Data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis regarding the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) indicates a significant rise in foreign investments in US stocks and bonds over the past few years. According to the SEC, foreign holdings of US equities reached $11.1 trillion at the end of 2022, with European investors accounting for a substantial portion of this increase. Investment firms have also noted this trend. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, reported a significant increase in European clients investing in US-focused funds in 2023 compared to the previous year. This shift is driven by the desire for higher returns and greater financial security. The growing distrust in the sustainability of European pension systems is leading young Europeans to seek more reliable investment opportunities abroad. The US stock markets, with their robust performance, diverse opportunities, and stable regulatory environment, have become an investment haven for these investors. As this trend continues, we can expect a sustained increase in investment flows into American companies, further bolstering the US economy and providing new growth opportunities for both US and European investors.

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

5 elements in investment risk to know more about

Risk management is crucial for investing because it helps investors identify, evaluate, and mitigate potential risks associated with their investments. Investing involves inherent risks, and understanding these risks is essential to making informed investment decisions that align with an investor’s financial goals and risk tolerance. Here are some important types of risks to consider when managing investments: Concentrated Position Risk: This risk arises when an investor holds a significant amount of their portfolio in a single asset or a small number of assets. The problem with a concentrated position is that it exposes the investor to the risks associated with that particular asset, which may result in a significant loss if the asset performs poorly. Allocation Risk Allocation risk is the risk that an investor’s portfolio is not diversified enough across different asset classes, sectors, or geographies. Diversification is important because it helps reduce the overall risk of a portfolio. A portfolio that is not properly diversified can be vulnerable to significant losses if one asset class or sector performs poorly. Income Risk Income risk is the risk that an investor’s income from investments will not meet their expectations or needs. This risk can be influenced by factors such as interest rate changes, dividend cuts, or economic downturns that affect the financial performance of the assets in an investor’s portfolio. Liquidity Risk Liquidity risk is the risk that an investor will not be able to sell their investments when they need to, or that they will have to sell at a significantly reduced price. This can occur when there is a lack of buyers in the market, or when the asset is illiquid, meaning that it cannot be easily converted to cash. Intrinsic Risk Intrinsic risk is the risk associated with the specific asset itself, such as a company’s financial health, management, or regulatory risks. This risk is inherent in the asset, and it is important for investors to thoroughly research and understand the risks associated with an asset before investing in it. In conclusion, risk management is critical for investing, and it involves identifying, evaluating, and mitigating risks associated with different types of investments. Investors must understand the risks associated with their investments, diversify their portfolios, and make informed decisions that align with their financial goals and risk tolerance.

Read More »
Inflation
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Four Things That Actually Matter With Inflation

Inflation is simply the rising costs of goods and services over time. It’s an important part of the planning process to make assumptions about buying power over time. It allows you to know how to budget your money using a placeholder that should represent to some academic degree the effectiveness of your dollar as you get closer to the time you need it. However, I have had several discussions with clients who assume the incline of inflation is something like 2% annually. And while that is a reasonable, and likely adequate initial placeholder, if your financial advisor is simply using that number because the talking heads on TV or the software they use have that number already baked in, then you need to have a serious discussion about the gaps that arise from such short cutting. A miss on the inflation discussion has two permanent repercussions on your financial plan: Inflation assesses its toll further and further into plans. It’s insidious and you won’t know the impact until the end of retirement, when you have fewer resources to make course corrections. It will affect what your expectation should be for your internal rate of return, particularly in your fixed income investments. If you are assuming a 2% inflation rate a 2% treasury may be appropriate, but if your personal inflation rate is actually 4% (likely from the reasons below) you will have an unaccounted for gap between the rising costs of goods and services and the yield from your chosen investments. This article is a good checklist to make sure that your financial advisor can discuss and will make adjustments for this gaps in inflation math: Your lifestyle No two retirees live the same lifestyle in retirement. If heard other advisors say that, and be able to adjust the product suite they use for risk, or which goals they bake into a plan, or even change the expected costs they use from goal to goal. But then each of them will extrapolate the costs of that lifestyle inflating at 2%. This is a mistake. This shows a lack of understanding as to what causes inflation and the effect it will have on your plan.  Inflation does not affect all products equally, in fact the most impacted items are usually isolated to the items that are purchased by everyone. Groceries, gasoline, and basic services are more impacted by steadily rising costs than that of large ticket consumer goods and electronics.  You may think that this isn’t a big deal right? We all buy groceries and that is a part of my financial plan. This type of thinking is ill-advised and offers a major gap in the calculations and the expectations you should have for your income.  Example: A client of mine said:  “I have a simple life, I don’t buy that many new things, and I’m not all that interested owning new cars, clothes and gadgets in retirement, my calculation for inflation should be pretty low.”  So he wanted me to lower his expected rate of inflation. I said wait a minute, you’re not thinking about that correctly, while yes, he is right that the things he buys may be simple and he’s not going to buy much, he’s wrong about the effect of inflation. Because he’s using the “2% average” he’s heard about he’s missed where the number comes from. The CPI is the change in a basket of goods and services, so it takes into account everything a regular american can reasonably buy (and it doesn’t include gasoline). So in aggregate the number may be 2%, but by not buying those items he’s taking on more, not less, inflation risk for the normal person. See in the chart below where we have eliminated the baskets he didn’t see himself buying (recall that the higher ticket consumer goods generally are disinflationary – the cost of a flat screen TV comes down with time and not up).  Item Annual change in inflation as a Percentage(%) Example clients inflation estimate Groceries +4% +4% Utilities +5% +5% Gasoline +5% +5% Movie Passes +4% +4% Healthcare +6% +6% Automobiles -3% NA Consumer Electronics -3% NA Clothing -2% NA Average 2% 4.8%   So while he is thinking that his appetite for spending is low, his exposure to inflation is more than twice the normal of people in retirement. So when we plan we are trying to extrapolate the costs of a certain lifestyle in retirement, in this scenario the inflation expectation should rise for this client, not fall. More severely, using a standard 2% inflation rate, will cause him to have a shortfall that becomes more complicated as he gets deeper and deeper into retirement.  Declining quality is inflation Several of the items that comprise your quality of life today, deteriorate in quality over time. This is not a hard and fast rule, and in some cases the opposite is true. But if you think about the nature of appliances, automobiles, and other big ticket consumer goods they can become suspect. The refresh cycle for large appliances in the 1990’s was 20% longer than it is for today. This is the result of a few elements, the “smart” revolution and added technology creating more demand for new items, and the decline in their quality. Both of these are measured as disinflationary, the costs of these items have come down year over year, and the “features-scape” is expanding. This all seems disinflationary and in the CPI it’s measured as costs coming down on these items. And while that might be a true statement for someone, the Bureau of Labor Statistics “buys” these items year over year to test the market changes, and for most people this is actually hidden inflation. Here is the math. If the price of an item comes down year over year by say 4%, but the refresh cycle is impacted by anything greater than 4% in a year, the result for regular people is actually inflation, not deflation. Because the

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest