InSight

Market InSights:

Tesla added to S&P500

Today is the last day that Tesla will not be part of the S&P. S&P Dow Jones Indices has announced Tesla’s addition Friday after the market close. Tesla will officially trade as a member of the S&P 500 by the time the market opens on Dec. 21. Today’s buy of Tesla at the market close will likely be the biggest buy order ever.

This means Tesla joins the S&P at today’s closing price, the volatility is already high because it is also the quadruple witching quarterly options expiration.

Some highlights you should know about TSLA’s inclusion:

  1. The addition of Tesla will cause the largest rebalancing ever of the S&P 500 ever – Tesla is the 9th largest company by market capitalization. Because most of the investments that track the SP500 are weighted by market cap, they will be adding more TSLA than anything else. It will represent about 1.5% of the index going forward. 
  2. The liquidity for Tesla will increase, as these passive funds enter the space, the access to TSLA will increase. Both to borrow and trade the access to TSLA should see some much needed liquidity.
  3. This will stabilize the historically volatile stock. The swings both directions on Tesla have been pretty epic over its lifespan. Expect that to temper somewhat. This won’t change Elon’s flagrant tweeting, or the inherently volatile relationship this company has with investors, but over time, such a large holding from passive tools like SPY will bring the range down on its intraday swings. Inversely, TSLA will start to bring its price instability to bear on the SP500 adding to its aggregate volatility.
  4. If you own exposure to U.S. Large Cap ETF’s and mutual funds, you will own more TSLA going forward. There is nothing you need to do to get the exposure. If you already own the TSLA stock outright, it is adding to the exposure. It’s likely time to rebalance.
  5. The SP500 will get a shot in the arm on the P/E ratio – expect this to jump suddenly, there is nothing wrong with the readout, TSLA’s PE (today) is close to 1300. Meaning you have to pay $1,300 for every dollar TSLA earns. Before today the PE on the broader SP500 was 37 (already high) and expect the bellwether that is Tesla to cause that further distortion. This inclusion may permanently impair any comparisons you or your broker has made to the PE of the SP500.
  6. Inclusion of TSLA, will cause some forced selling of other names of make room. Fund will have to make room for Tesla, and will push out 1.5% from the other names to make room.

The closest similarity we can draw is when Yahoo was added. It too was not a member of an S&P small or midcap index prior to its inclusion and had a similar rush to buy when it was included in 1999. As a reminder, this was considered the beginning of the “tech bubble” by many. Yahoo stock rose 50% between the announcement and its entry into the index at the time. 

Some funds have been adding to the TSLA position, in anticipation of this inclusion, but many passive funds are not allowed to until today, as close to the close as possible.

More related articles:

Boulder Colorado Debt Investments
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Hidden Hazards of Mezzanine Debt: What You Need to Know

Mezzanine debt refers to a type of financing that lies between traditional senior debt (such as bank loans) and equity in the capital structure of a company. It represents a form of subordinated debt that combines features of both debt and equity instruments. Mezzanine debt holders have a higher risk tolerance compared to senior debt holders but typically receive a higher potential return. In the world of finance, mezzanine debt has gained popularity as an alternative investment option. It offers attractive returns to investors seeking higher yields than traditional fixed-income instruments. However, behind the allure of potential profits lie dangers and risks that demand careful consideration. In this blog post, we will shed light on the hidden hazards associated with buying mezzanine debt, allowing you to make informed decisions. Subordinate Position: Mezzanine debt typically holds a subordinate position in the capital structure of a company. This means that in the event of default or bankruptcy, mezzanine debt holders will be paid off after senior debt holders, leaving them exposed to greater risk. If the underlying company faces financial distress, the recovery prospects for mezzanine debt holders may be significantly diminished, leading to potential losses. Complexity and Lack of Transparency: Mezzanine debt investments can be complex and challenging to assess. Unlike publicly traded securities, mezzanine debt often lacks the transparency and oversight that comes with regulated markets. Investors may face difficulties in accurately evaluating the underlying assets, cash flows, and risks associated with these investments. Without proper due diligence, it becomes challenging to gauge the true value and sustainability of the investment. Interest Rate and Payment Structure: Mezzanine debt often carries a higher interest rate than traditional debt instruments, compensating investors for the additional risk they assume. However, the interest payments on mezzanine debt are often structured as “payment in kind” (PIK) or deferred payments. PIK interest accrues and is paid at a later date or upon maturity, leading to potential cash flow challenges for investors who rely on a regular income. Market Dependency and Liquidity Risk: Mezzanine debt is typically illiquid and lacks an active secondary market. Unlike publicly traded stocks or bonds, it can be difficult to find buyers or exit a mezzanine debt investment before maturity. This illiquidity exposes investors to significant liquidity risk, tying up their capital for extended periods. It can become problematic if the investor needs to access funds or respond to changing market conditions quickly. Business Performance and Default Risk: Investing in mezzanine debt inherently ties the investor’s fortunes to the performance and success of the underlying company. If the company’s financial health deteriorates or experiences operational challenges, the risk of default on the debt increases. Factors such as market conditions, industry disruptions, or poor management decisions can significantly impact the repayment ability of the company, thus jeopardizing the investment. Lack of Collateral and Security: Unlike senior debt holders, mezzanine debt investors often have limited or no access to collateral or security. In case of default, senior debt holders have a higher claim to the company’s assets, leaving mezzanine debt investors with diminished recovery prospects. This lack of collateral increases the risk exposure for mezzanine debt holders, as their recovery relies solely on the success and ability of the company to generate sufficient cash flows. While mezzanine debt investments offer the potential for attractive returns, it is essential to understand the associated risks and hazards. Subordinate position, complexity, lack of transparency, interest payment structures, liquidity risk, business performance, and lack of collateral all contribute to the dangers involved in buying mezzanine debt. As an investor, thorough due diligence, risk assessment, and a well-diversified portfolio are crucial when considering this alternative investment option. It is advisable to consult with experienced financial professionals who can provide guidance tailored to your specific circumstances.  

Read More »
credit card
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Asset Borrowing in Self Directed IRA and Roth’s

Like getting a mortgage on a home, borrowing inside of a Self Directed IRA (SDRIA) can help add leverage, expand the upside of an investment and pose undue risks. It should only be used as part of a greater investment strategy coordinated by a CFP® or CPA®. Most borrowing in a SDIRA is for the purchase of real estate or a business inside of a tax advantaged account. Borrowing can make some assets more accessible to investors, and the upside and cash flow is often a fantastic endowment for any retirement strategy. An important note: interest payments made from a SDIRA are not tax deductible and you should note that in your investment calculations. Finding an working with a lender is also as important as vetting the investment and any other partner involved in the investment. We prefer using banks and other institutional lenders to limit risk and provide continuity. Please consult the InSight property acquisition process for more details on both borrowing and buying real estate. There are restrictions that you should be aware of from the outset that will help make having debt in the Self Directed IRA or Roth’s easier.  You cannot borrow money from yourself Understand prohibited counterparties The loan must be in your IRA’s name You can’t sign a personal guarantee You can’t pay off the loan with personal funds The debt must be non-recourse The debt service should be covered by monthly income at a rate of +1x (ideally, +1.15x) Be aware of any other conditions that are required by the lender If the above conditions do not compromise the investment strategy in the account, then borrowing inside of a Self Directed IRA might be the right fit for you. How using debt in your InSight-Full® financial plan is up to you and your CFP®. 

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Using an Improvement Exchange

Imagine being able to sell your appreciated property with all of its gains intact, reinvesting in a new property, and having a budget for improvements, all while enjoying the capital growth of that new property immediately. Guess what? There is an exchange method for that! Here is the Issue Under the IRS rules, once you take ownership of a property, any additional expenditures used to make improvements to the property cannot count towards the value of the replacement property in the exchange. An example of this problem: say that you’re selling building A for $1m and buying building B for $800k. But Building B requires $200k in desired improvements. In a traditional exchange this is a nonstarter; because real estate exchanges have to involve disposing of and acquiring “like-kind” real estate. And unfortunately, the additional labor and materials are not considered “like-kind” for the purposes of the acquisition and cannot be part of the exchange. So the $200k in required improvements cannot be part of the transaction. However… If an InSight client prefers a situation where they need to relinquish property and desires to renovate the next property, there is a path to eliminating the tax loss of the investment AND getting your renovations done. Enter the Improvement Exchange An essential, but overlooked part of the IRS code, can help InSight clients keep their expectations of avoiding a tax loss while making desired improvements a reality. This accommodation can be used to develop the right exchange strategy for the transaction that the business or person requires. If you need to contract out for repairs or improvements, make strategic accommodations for a renter, or change the opportunity completely – this method creates the space to achieve those changes to the property. Under the IRS code in Revenue Procedure 2000-37, an independent third party may take title to the replacement property in the taxpayer’s stead and make the desired improvements on the taxpayer’s behalf. Using an Exchange Accommodation Titleholder (or EAT) In a traditional exchange, the exchange company acts as a qualified intermediary or QI. This means they act as a third-party agent that is both an arms reach from the taxpayer and they help to coordinate the timeline and reporting requirements to make the exchange IRS compliant. If the taxpayer requires improvements the conditions can change.  The exchange company can become an Exchange Accommodation Titleholder or EAT and modifications can be made before the Taxpayer takes ownership – making the desired improvements to the property before taking possession. The EAT takes title to the new property and parks, or holds, that title until the earliest of the following: 180 days from when the relinquished property is sold The improvements are completed 180 days from when the replacement property was parked by the EAT The InSight client can enter into a property improvement exchange with an EAT and direct the QI to send funds periodically to the EAT. Making the desired improvements based on the eventual owner’s instructions. Effectively making the building improvements now part of the acquired property after the close of property A and before taking possession of Property B. Seemingly limitless contractors, consultants, and designers can be paid out by the EAT during this phase, and the owner walks into Building B on day one of ownership with the work done, ready for business and with the changes they envision. In the End The client’s old properties cost basis is rolled into the new property, no taxes are paid on the sale of property A – and property B has received the required improvements to enable it to serve the investor better going forward.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest