InSight

Market InSights:

There Is Too Much Money

You read that right, there is simply too much cash in the capital markets to not see a handful of effects that could impact your investments and plan. The supply of money floating around is massive right now. There is a lot of risk, COVID has us concerned about the economics of the coming year, but it’s getting harder and harder to ignore how much cash has been made available.

Even relative to itself, it’s a volume of cash in the money supply that will take at least a decade to settle into long term investments, or be recaptured by the Fed. At the beginning of the year there was roughly $15T in circulation held in cash and cash equivalents. We are in December and the number is closer to $19T of more highly liquid cash in the world. This $4T expansion in only 12 months is remarkable.

Here’s some history on money supply. It took until 1997 to reach the first $4T in circulation, the decade from 2009 to 2019 saw that supply double from $8T to almost $16T (the fastest doubling ever), resulting in a major part of the expansion of the stock market for that decade. Now, in twelve months we have seen a flood of almost 27% more money in the supply than there was at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

One of the best leading indicators for where capital markets are headed, can be found in how much money, especially highly liquid money like cash, is available in the system. This is a reflection of how big the pie is. Usually in investments we are focused on cash flow, and a companies market share – or how effective a company is at capturing cash flow from a given size of market. That’s becoming less relevant as the sheer volume of cash has exploded. The pie is so big right now that there will have to be a a few notable adjustments to make:

InflationWhile I have heard that Jerome Powell has not registered an increase in inflation yet, it is hard to believe that as the newly introduced money will not have an expansive effect on the costs of goods and services. Many mark the inflation rate off the CPI, grievances with that benchmark aside, it would be irresponsible to assume that the basket of securities they mark to market does not see an above average increase as more money finds its way into the same number of consumer goods. Additionally, elements like rents will see a disproportionate increase in the coming decade because while supply of say consumer goods will increase quickly to capture this cash, construction of rental properties is a less reactive market and a slower roll out to correct the market. In the meantime expect rental costs and revenues to see above average inflation figures. 

Interest Rates – Permanently impaired. As I write this the current observation, the 10 year US Treasury is paying 0.9%, a third of where it was even 2 years ago. It is heard to believe that such a robust introduction of cash doesn’t become a permanent downward pressure on fixed income assets for the foreseeable future. Unless there is a formal and aggressive contraction of the money supply, it will take decades for the amount of cash in circulation to let up that downward pressure on bonds. Interest rates in short term assets will be particularly affected as the demand has become less appetizing in contrast to long term debt, and the supply of cash is chasing too small of demand. 

EquitiesThe real benefactor here. It is hard not to believe that over the course of the coming decade, this cash infusion doesn’t trickle its way up and into the stock market and other asset values. Generally the most “risky” part of the market is the historically the benefactor of excesses in cash. Companies will do what they do best and capture this supply of cash through normal operations, this will expand their revenues and ultimately the bottom line. Additionally, the compressed borrowing costs from low interest rates will lower their operating costs. Compound the poor risk reward ratio in bonds and you will see more of those investments seek out stocks, real estate, and other capital assets. This sector will see a virtuous combination of more revenue, and more demand for shares. Expect permanently elevated P/E reads for the time being. 

 

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

Not just outperformance, the right performance

We are a firm that believes the majority of a client’s ability to generate wealth happens from decisions made outside of their investment portfolio. However, we take our role as active managers seriously and have developed a fundamentals-driven process to target and deliver the right kind of investment performance for the investor. Active management, to us, doesn’t mean seeking out the ‘fire cracker’ stocks that rule clickbait. It means finding the right mixture of capital growth, income generation, and volatility that fuels the client’s InSight-full(R) financial plan. We provide active management for our clients based on their needs and the fundamental and stylistic collection of assets that get them the returns they need. How a company makes and distributes cash flow to investors is the most important analysis that we provide. Our investment discipline is rooted in two core themes that add predictability to the portfolio and raise the success of a person’s investment returns. These two core themes are: Individual Stock Fundamentals: Many advisors in our industry are concerned with putting clients into mutual funds, and other packaged products. Because evaluating and selecting individual stocks is time-consuming and requires a level of analytical expertise they don’t have. We respectfully disagree, doing the due diligence and finding the right assets is key to creating the appropriate investment performance for a client. No two financial plans are the same, so how can the same set of investments be the right fit for a client? This is why we think and measure and strategic exposure to the right collection of individual stocks or bonds is the way to invest and the bare minimum our clients are owed from their investment management. Sector Driven Investing: Through our due diligence process there are also broad market conditions that lead to a “theme” we simply won’t ignore. Economic conditions like interest rate sensitivity, labor costs, commodity prices, or generational changes in technologies have broad implications for entire sectors. They create broad, long-term growth cycles that fuel increases in cash flows and ultimately a repricing of companies across the group. Diversity is important to portfolio predictability, but just as important is channeling investment dollars deliberately into the groups that have the best economic conditions for success. It is by combining these two disciplines into a single coordinated approach to investing that our clients get the market returns they need to make their InSight-Full® plan a success.

Read More »
Boulder
Articles
Peter Locke

Why I moved to Boulder, Colorado and started my own Registered Investment Advisory Business

To start, I grew up in Northern Virginia, right outside of Washington D.C. I am the youngest of three boys who live all over the United States and proud son of my mother and father. Growing up my parents or schools never taught me the importance of investing or planning. My parents taught me to work hard, get a good job, and make sure you buy things on sale. My mother, no matter what, cooked every night and took pride in providing us the best life possible.  Health was her main focus and my father’s area of expertise was academia. However, my great grandfather was a pioneer in the investing space.  His legacy provided three generations the ability to go to college debt free. This provided my parents the opportunity to give us the best that education had to offer and catapulted me into where I am today here in Boulder. His desire to give future generations this opportunity is something I’ve now dedicated my life to as well. Early in my life I learned that the greatest currency in life is the effect that you have on other people. When I was at summer camp as a young man, I learned invaluable lessons that I still live by today. Those lessons taught me that if I dedicate myself to others and help guide them through one of the most difficult things we have to handle as individuals, finances, then I will find all of the fulfillment I need.  Unfortunately, our education system does a very poor job of educating our youth to make good financial decisions. We’re taught the more you make the more you can have and we live in a never ending cycle of wanting more. Over the past decade of working in Boulder with individual clients and families, I’ve learned some of the biggest mistakes people have made and why they make them. I’ve also learned what the most successful people in some of the most affluent cities in the U.S. do to accumulate and keep wealth. The financial advising world, however, has a bad name and for good reason. For far too long, advisors were and still are, compensated for the wrong reasons like selling their own products for commissions. In my opinion, financial advisors should never be able to sell products for commissions. It represents far too big of a conflict of interest and should be done away with. However, we aren’t there yet even though there is a big movement to do so.  That leaves me with where I am today.  Starting my own advisory firm with a business partner that shares my same vision in Boulder, CO.  Now I can proudly say, I’ve never sold my own product or fund to a client. At big firms, you’re told to stay in the corporate lanes of what can be offered to clients. This goes beyond not being able to help clients with questions around stock advice. You’re given strict instructions to never tell clients about third-party solutions that would better meet their needs, or share a name of a company/person for tax planning, estate planning, insurance planning, mortgages, 529 plans, brokers, or retirement plan administrators or companies.  Even when you’re a CFP® professional, you’re bound by the same restrictions.  How could I continue serving clients in a holistic manner as their fiduciary when I can really only help them with the investment piece? The investment solutions I was selling though were fine. They gave clients well-diversified portfolios for a percentage of assets under management. The problem was, we were giving clients a solution that met the company’s guidelines, meaning, it wasn’t really my advice. If the clients had a certain net worth, made a certain income, and said they could handle a certain amount of risk, the ‘algorithm’ spit out a couple of portfolios that the company said we could give to the client. This is not financial planning. Although it was appropriate for some clients that just wanted something very safe and didn’t have the time, desire, or expertise to do it on their own, it wasn’t adequate if you truly wanted to be their fiduciary and meet the standards of the CFP® Board. So I left.   I no longer could work for a firm that wasn’t allowing me to serve clients in the manner they need to be served. I needed to offer clients solutions that would serve them more than investment management based on a theory (Modern Portfolio Theory) that was developed almost 70 years ago. Now I am not saying or attempting to say the theory is incorrect by any stretch of the imagination, but what I am saying is, right now a large portion of the theory isn’t doing what it has in the past and portfolio managers across the country aren’t adapting accordingly.  The clients I worked with for many years here in Boulder, knew they didn’t get rich with their investment strategy. They got rich with their savings and spending strategy. They focused on key elements like automating a certain amount of savings for their retirement and after-tax accounts before spending. They knew if they could save 20%-30% of their income they could retire earlier and live a more fulfilling life. To clarify, they didn’t live a better life because they had more in their retirement accounts. They had prioritized what was important, like focusing on shared experiences with family and friends, traveling, exercising, eating better instead of buying the newest and shiniest clothes, cars, and things. They stayed disciplined with their strategies as they knew that tinkering with their investments or savings meant prolonging their working days. They surrounded themselves with the right people, the right process, and the policies to hold them accountable and that’s what my business partner and I at InSight will do for our clients.  As fiduciaries in Boulder, we will always put the client first. 

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

The Future Semiconductor Requirements for AI Chips: Unlocking the Next Chapter of Innovation

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an indispensable part of our lives, driving advancements in various fields such as healthcare, finance, and transportation. At the heart of this technological revolution lie AI chips, which are the engines powering AI systems. As AI continues to evolve, the demand for more powerful and efficient AI chips is rapidly increasing. In this blog post, we will explore the current leaders in the AI chip space, examine the limitations of existing semiconductor technologies, and discuss where innovation needs to come from for the next chapter of AI chip development. Current Leaders in the AI Chip Space: Several companies have emerged as leaders in the AI chip space, each offering unique solutions to meet the growing demands of AI applications. Here are some notable examples: NVIDIA: NVIDIA has been at the forefront of AI chip development with their Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). GPUs excel at parallel processing, making them well-suited for AI workloads. NVIDIA’s GPUs, such as the Tesla V100 and A100, have become the industry standard for training deep neural networks. Intel: Intel has made significant strides in AI chip development with its Intel Xeon processors and Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). Their processors combine high-performance computing capabilities with AI acceleration features, while FPGAs offer flexible and customizable solutions for AI tasks. Google DeepMind: Google has developed its own AI-specific chip called the Tensor Processing Unit (TPU). TPUs are designed to accelerate both training and inference tasks and have been deployed in Google data centers to power various AI applications, including natural language processing and image recognition. Limitations of Current Semiconductor Technologies: While the current leaders have made remarkable advancements, there are several limitations associated with existing semiconductor technologies that hinder further progress in AI chip development: Power Consumption: AI workloads demand substantial computational power, which often leads to increased power consumption. The energy requirements of AI chips can limit their deployment in resource-constrained environments or mobile devices, where power efficiency is crucial. Memory Bandwidth: AI algorithms heavily rely on large amounts of data, necessitating high memory bandwidth. Current memory technologies face challenges in providing sufficient bandwidth to keep up with the processing requirements of advanced AI models. Latency and Real-Time Processing: Certain AI applications, such as autonomous vehicles and robotics, require real-time processing capabilities. The latency introduced by data movement between memory and processing units can impede the performance and responsiveness of such systems. The Next Chapter of Innovation: To overcome the limitations of current semiconductor technologies and unlock the next chapter of AI chip development, innovation needs to come from multiple fronts: Material Science and Chip Design: Advancements in material science can lead to the development of new materials that offer improved performance, power efficiency, and thermal management. Additionally, innovative chip designs that are optimized for AI workloads, such as neuromorphic architectures or specialized accelerators, can further enhance AI chip capabilities. Memory Technologies: Innovations in memory technologies, such as high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and non-volatile memory, can address the memory bandwidth challenge. These technologies have the potential to offer faster access to data and enable more efficient AI computations. Quantum Computing: Quantum computing holds promise for solving complex AI problems by leveraging quantum algorithms and principles. While still in its early stages, advancements in quantum computing could potentially revolutionize AI chip architectures and significantly enhance their processing capabilities. Neuromorphic Computing: Inspired by the human brain, neuromorphic computing aims to create chips that can process information in a manner similar to how the brain works. This approach can lead to energy-efficient and highly parallel AI chips that mimic the brain’s neural networks. The future of AI chip development lies in overcoming the limitations of current semiconductor technologies. By focusing on material science, chip design, memory technologies, quantum computing, and neuromorphic computing, researchers and engineers can usher in the next chapter of AI chip innovation. The convergence of these advancements will pave the way for more powerful, efficient, and versatile AI chips, enabling new possibilities and applications across various industries.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest