What Constitutes “Like-Kind” in a 1031 Exchange?

Financial Planning Dentist

The requirement for tax-deferred exchanges of property has always stated that the Replacement Property acquired must be of a “like-kind” to the property sold, known as the Relinquished Property. This principle has been in effect since the addition of IRC Section 1031 to the tax code in 1921. The basis for this requirement is the “continuity of investment” doctrine, which states that if a taxpayer continues their investment from one property to another similar property without receiving any cash profit from the sale, no tax should be triggered. However, it is important to note that this tax liability is only deferred, not eliminated. Given the significance of this requirement in tax-deferred exchanges, it is essential to understand what exactly “like-kind” means.

Fortunately, in the context of real property, the analysis is straightforward. For 1031 exchange purposes, all real property is generally considered “like-kind” to each other, irrespective of the asset class or specific property type. Contrary to common misconceptions, a taxpayer selling an apartment building does not need to acquire another apartment building as a replacement property. Instead, they can choose any other type of real estate, such as raw land, an office building, an interest in a Delaware Statutory Trust (DST), etc., as long as it meets the criteria of being considered real property under applicable rules, intended for business or investment use, and properly identified within the 45-day identification period. It’s worth noting that personal property exchanges are no longer eligible for tax deferral under Section 1031 since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act amendment in 2018.

This leads us to the question: what qualifies as “real property” for Section 1031 purposes?

Examples of real estate interests that are considered like-kind include single or multi-family rental properties, office buildings, apartment buildings, shopping centers, warehouses, industrial property, farm and ranch land, vacant land held for appreciation, cooperative apartments (Co-ops), Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs), hotels and motels, cell tower and billboard easements, conservation easements, lessee’s interest in a 30-year lease, warehouses, interests in a Contract for Deed, land trusts, growing crops, mineral, oil, and gas rights, water and timber rights, wind farms, and solar arrays.

In December 2020, the IRS issued new regulations that provide further clarification on the definition of real property in the Code of Federal Regulations. These regulations specify certain types of “inherently permanent structures” and “structural components” that qualify as real estate and are eligible for exchange treatment. Examples of inherently permanent structures include in-ground swimming pools, roads, bridges, tunnels, paved parking areas, special foundations, stationary wharves and docks, fences, outdoor advertising displays, outdoor lighting facilities, railroad tracks and signals, telephone poles, power generation, and transmission facilities, permanently installed telecommunications cables, microwave transmission towers, oil and gas pipelines, offshore platforms, grain storage bins, and silos.

Structural components likely to qualify as real property include walls, partitions, doors, wiring, plumbing systems, central air conditioning and heating systems, pipes and ducts, elevators and escalators, floors, ceilings, permanent coverings, insulation, chimneys, fire suppression systems, fire escapes, security systems, humidity control systems, and similar property.

It’s important to note that foreign real estate is not considered like-kind to U.S. real estate, according to Section 1031(h) of the Tax Code. However, U.S. taxpayers can exchange foreign property for foreign property, which is considered like-kind and eligible for Section 1031 exchange treatment, with some limited exceptions.

In addition to meeting the like-kind requirements, the potential replacement property must be formally identified within 45 days of selling the relinquished property, and the identified property must be acquired within 180 days of the sale. Property received by a taxpayer that was not identified or received within these timeframes is not considered like-kind.

In the past, there was a misconception that the like-kind requirement meant trading into the same type of property that was sold. However, the true intention behind the like-kind requirement has always been to maintain the continuity of investment. While Section 1031 exchanges previously applied to personal property, intangible property, and real estate, the amendment in 2018 restricted exchanges to only real estate. Nevertheless, the determination of what constitutes like-kind real estate has remained unchanged—all types of real estate are considered like-kind to each other.

More related articles:

Kevin Taylor

The investment opportunity in semiconductors

Microchips, more commonly known as computer chips or integrated circuits, have become an integral part of our lives. They are present in everything from our smartphones and laptops to our cars and household appliances. In recent years, the importance of microchips has grown exponentially, particularly with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. At their core, microchips are essentially tiny electronic circuits etched onto a small piece of semiconducting material. They contain transistors, which are essentially tiny switches that can be turned on and off to perform calculations and process information. The number of transistors on a chip has been increasing rapidly over the past few decades, following Moore’s Law, which states that the number of transistors on a chip doubles approximately every two years. The increasing number of transistors on a chip has led to the development of more powerful and efficient processors, which are the backbone of computing power. The more transistors on a chip, the more calculations can be performed simultaneously, and the faster and more efficient the processing power becomes. This has allowed for the development of faster and more sophisticated computing systems, from supercomputers to smartphones. However, the significance of microchips extends beyond just computing power. With the rise of AI and machine learning, microchips have become the cornerstone for the development of these technologies. AI relies on large amounts of data and complex algorithms to make decisions and predictions, which require immense computing power and the ability to process vast amounts of data quickly. This is where microchips come in, providing the necessary processing power and efficiency to support these complex algorithms and enable the development of AI and machine learning systems. As AI continues to evolve and become more advanced, the demand for more powerful and efficient microchips will only increase. Companies that specialize in the design and manufacture of microchips, such as Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, and Qualcomm, are at the forefront of this rapidly growing industry. Investing in these companies can be a smart move for those interested in the potential growth of the microchip industry and the continued development of AI and machine learning technologies. Microchips are a revolution right now, the backbone of modern computing, and are crucial for the development of AI and machine learning. The increasing number of transistors on a chip has led to more powerful and efficient processors, which have enabled the development of faster and more sophisticated computing systems. As AI continues to evolve and become more advanced, the demand for more powerful and efficient microchips will only increase, making them a crucial investment opportunity for those interested in the future of technology.

Read More »
Kevin Taylor

What is a Grantor Letter and how is it different from a K-1?

A grantor letter and a Form 1065 Schedule K-1 are essential documents in taxation and financial reporting, each serving distinct purposes. The grantor letter, also known as a grantor statement or grantor trust letter, is issued by the creator (grantor) of a trust to its beneficiaries. It furnishes details on the tax treatment of income generated within the trust, including earned income, deductions, and other relevant tax information. This letter enables beneficiaries to accurately report their share of the trust’s income on their personal tax returns. On the other hand, the Form 1065 Schedule K-1 is utilized by partnerships, LLCs, and S corporations to inform partners, members, or shareholders of their portion of the entity’s income, deductions, credits, and other pertinent tax items. Each recipient receives a personalized form tailored to their specific income distribution or ownership interest, aiding them in their individual tax filings. Although both documents facilitate tax reporting and promote transparency, they differ in origin and focus. Grantor letters originate from trust creators and center on trust income tax treatment, while K-1 forms are issued by entities to their stakeholders, providing comprehensive details on income distribution and tax-related matters specific to the entity. When establishing trusts, tax management is crucial, with the grantor’s tax responsibilities often influencing trust structure. Grantor trusts, which allow the grantor to retain certain powers or ownership benefits, necessitate the issuance of grantor letters for tax reporting purposes. Even though revocable trusts may streamline asset distribution post-mortem, they typically do not alleviate the grantor’s tax obligations during their lifetime, requiring them to include trust income details in their personal tax filings. In summary, while both grantor letters and K-1 forms play pivotal roles in tax compliance and financial transparency, their issuance, focus, and applicability differ significantly, reflecting the distinct contexts in which they are employed.

Read More »
Denver Investment Experts Financial Planning
Kevin Taylor

Nikola Jokic was Robbed – and is a good lesson about this market

Let me tell you about Nikola Jokic, the Denver Nuggets’ skilled center, and basketball poet. Despite his impressive performance, he was unfairly overlooked and missed out on his third MVP recognition. Jokic’s numbers in the 2022-2023 season were exceptional – and he represents the most “value” any player in the NBA brings to his team. When Jokic is on the court, the team boasts an impressive +380 plus/minus* rating for the season. However, when he is not playing, their plus/minus rating drops to -201. His individual contributions are highlighted by his average plus/minus per game of +6.1. If the Nuggets performed at an average level without him, their win/loss record is projected at 58-24. However, without Jokic, their Net Rating plummets to -7.7, resulting in an expected win/loss record of 22-60, a significant decline of 36 wins. Although it’s disappointing that Jokic didn’t win his third MVP title, it’s crucial to recognize and appreciate the impact he makes, similar to the mega-cap group of $1T companies discussed below, and how it relates to the U.S. stock market. Likewise, when the five largest companies by market cap are removed from the S&P 500 we see a much different performance than we’re seeing right now…  A tale of two indexes:  On May 30th, Nvidia made headlines by joining the exclusive $1 trillion club for the first time. As a maker and designer of A.I. hardware and software, Nvidia achieved this remarkable milestone by raising its valuation by a staggering $280 billion or nearly 40% since May 15th. This extraordinary leap in value is unparalleled in the history of capital markets, although the company closed just below the trillion-dollar mark. However, there is a downside to Nvidia’s success, which reflects the overall trend of trillion-dollar companies this year. The five members of the Trillion-Dollar Club, including Apple, Microsoft, Google parent Alphabet, Amazon, and now Nvidia, have witnessed a synchronized surge in their market valuations. This surge among a select few has single-handedly propelled the S&P 500 index to +9% YTD. Without these “Super 7” (including Facebook and Tesla) the rest of the SP500 has moved less than 1% for the year. While the +9% move of the SP500 may seem positive at first, it raises concerns about the market’s dependency on these few mega-cap companies. The exorbitant prices they have reached may already be stretched to their limits, making it unlikely for them to sustain the market’s upward trajectory. The rise of Nvidia exemplifies the frothiness that has enveloped the Trillion-Dollar Club. The Trillion-Dollar Club has accounted for nearly all the gains made by the S&P 500 this year. Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Nvidia have each experienced significant increases in their market caps since January, with Nvidia leading the pack at a remarkable 176%. Together, the current members of the Trillion-Dollar Club have added a staggering $2.87 trillion to their combined market cap since the beginning of 2023. These were names that we were and in some cases still are bullish on, but the concern then comes from looming weakness in other parts of the market.  Interestingly, this rise is only slightly higher than the overall increase in the S&P 500, which stands at $2.98 trillion. Consequently, the Trillion-Dollar Club’s contribution amounts to 96% of the 9.5% year-to-date increase in the index. In essence, we can think of the Trillion-Dollar Club as a company called “Big 5 Llc”. This “company” has seen its valuation surge by 46.2% from $6.2 to $9.1 trillion. On the other hand, the remaining 495 companies in the S&P 500 have only experienced a combined gain of 0.3%.  Without the tremendous boost from the Trillion-Dollar Club, the S&P 500 would essentially be flat for the year. We have been bullish on these chip makers and tech companies for some time (examples below) but think the recent run is getting a little too exuberant and divorcing from the broader market.  Places where we discussed the potential in the AI and Chips group: The Bifercated Landscape of the “Technology” Group: Exciting Investment Trends to Follow The investment opportunity in semiconductors When does a Bear look like a Bull? The overwhelming weight of the Trillion-Dollar Club has made the S&P 500 lopsided. At the end of 2022, the club accounted for 17.6% of the S&P’s total valuation. Now, it represents 25.6%, meaning that more than one dollar in four is attributed to these mega-cap companies. As their combined market cap has increased by nearly $3 trillion in just five months, the Big Five have become significantly more expensive. Their overall price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, which is the total valuation divided by combined net earnings, has risen from 27.7 to 40.6. This indicates that investors are receiving 33% fewer dollars in earnings for every $100 they invest compared to Christmas of 2022. To put it in perspective, the current P/E ratio for the Trillion-Dollar Club is almost twice that of the overall S&P 500. This situation is concerning, considering that the Trillion-Dollar Club has already achieved substantial earnings growth since the start of the pandemic. In 2022, these seven companies generated approximately $224 billion in net profits, which was 50% more than their pre-COVID earnings in 2019. Therefore, the high multiples at which they are currently trading come on top of potentially unsustainable profit levels. The concern from here is that any weakness in this small group would be felt significantly in the broader market.  This narrow leadership can be a good sign if the momentum becomes contagious and the cash on the sidelines is brought into the market. But while cash is so lucrative, the velocity at which the cash comes into a market expecting a recession is unlikely. However, three main risks persist: Interest Rate Risk – More Constrained Lending Coming: One significant risk in the current market is the potential for more constrained lending due to interest rate changes. When interest rates rise, borrowing becomes more expensive, which can lead to reduced consumer spending and business investment. Higher interest

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest