InSight

Market InSights:

Dogecoin

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

How to Survive a Bear Attack? (Pt. 1)

Growing your Investment Balance During a Recession One of the biggest reasons the rank and file investor loses money during a recession is a lack of focus and plan. It is true that markets will get volatile from time to time. But why institutions tend to make money during these periods and private investors lose money is all in how they react. The pejorative term “smart money and dumb money” is never more clear than when tracking behaviors during a pandemic.  “Smart Money” is patient, it knows what it owns and why, and has a long-term view. Institutions watch markets daily and don’t react. They know what they’re looking for in market trends before the headlines tell them what to be excited about.  “Dumb Money” is reactive and follows markets where headlines lead them. They are concerned with “account balances” and what they hold. They will routinely sell and buy in synchrony with headlines and sentiment.  That being said, it’s easy to get fearful when the economy is down (a recession), and it’s even easier to react to what you hear about the market. Likewise, it is entirely normal for you to be curious about how you can make money by investing in these times.  Certain investments, such as stocks, can be riskier in a down market, this is true. However, you might be able to see large returns from a recession if you follow these basic and timeless strategies. While it’s tempting to try to “time the market” when stock prices are low and falling, what you end up doing is trying to front run other speculative investors. This is a costly and often errant strategy. You might be shocked then to hear that the best way to invest during a recession is the same as when the economy is growing. They are investors who own what they want and slowly accumulate more of it in a routine and measured way over a long period of time. You can do this as well by setting a monthly cadence and doing the following: Continue to Dollar-Cost Average (DCA) Whether you’re regularly contributing to a 401(k) or an IRA, or investing through your broker, it’s wise to continue doing so during a recession if you can. Recessions are not a permanent state of affairs and anyone who can tell you how and why they will end is guessing. The best investors work with CFP®s to develop a cadence to keep buying through the whole troughing phase of the recession. This allows the investor to capture the stocks they want, at typically lower prices and continually buy throughout the entirety of the business cycle.  You will likely miss out on important dividends and reinvestment opportunities if you are out of the market. However, buying more shares when the economy is weakened is some of the best buying opportunities an investor has. Those who are in the accumulation stage of investing should hold tight, know what they want, and put themselves in a position to own more of what they want.  As you continue to buy lower, you are making the average price you pay for stock lower, which tends to boost returns in the long run and allows you to be more tactical with your selling come to the retirement phase.  Rebalance Your Portfolio We own companies for a reason, some are essential businesses that will do well during or following the emergence of a recession; even if their activities beneath the surface are not immediately reflected in the share price. A good example of this was Amazon during the ‘08 financial crisis. This is a company that saw the stock fall from the mid $80s to the low $30s all while consumers were looking for a cheaper way to get their goods and shore up their own home economics. A gap Amazon was willing and able to step into. They grew their customer base incredibly through this period resulting in an appreciation of their stock price for the next decade.   You can change the balance of your holdings when you notice prices falling. You then rebalance your holdings or return your asset allocation to its original targets. This maneuver allows you to deliberately increase your exposure to “oversold” and “undervalued” positions in your portfolio. When these stocks rebound, you bring the exposure back down to the desired levels. This small and subtle re-posturing allows investors to take advantage of the short-term price dislocations in a long-term, value-based strategy.  For example, if your target balance is 20% software and technology, but the price drops to 15% in the portfolio, adjusting this back to 20% in the throes of a bear market will mean that when the sector or stock returns to a higher price, you will have a higher exposure (say 25%) and you will be in a position to sell.  Keep a Long-Term View If you’re buying stocks, ETFs, or stock mutual funds, you won’t need to withdraw from your account(s) for at least five years to ten years. If that is your timeframe, the current recession will be well in the rearview mirror before you need these funds. The average “recession” since World War II is one year (11.2 months). This is a combination of a few economic reasons, but suffice it to say, that while the sentiment becomes bleak, relative to the length of a bullish economy, it is a very small part of the investment cycle. That being said, it’s important to keep the long-term view – markets restore balance and are still the best way to increase your individual wealth. The historic 10.5% return of the S&P 500 takes into account these slowed economic times. In fact, if you step out of the market, don’t reinvest dividends at these levels, and don’t rebalance your portfolios, you will likely lower the long-term return that you are expecting. The Bottom Line Financial markets are the single most efficient way of transferring money from the national and global markets

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

What are the Fiduciary Responsibilities?

A fiduciary is a person or organization entrusted with the responsibility of managing assets or property on behalf of someone else. A fiduciary has a legal obligation to act in the best interest of their client or beneficiary and to exercise a high level of care and diligence in carrying out their duties. In this blog post, we will discuss fiduciary responsibilities and why they are essential in the management of assets and property. What are fiduciary responsibilities? Fiduciary responsibilities are legal and ethical obligations that fiduciaries must uphold in managing assets or property for someone else. These responsibilities include: Duty of loyalty: Fiduciaries must act in the best interests of their clients or beneficiaries and avoid any conflicts of interest. This means that they cannot use their position for personal gain or benefit. Duty of care: Fiduciaries must exercise a high level of care and diligence in managing assets or property on behalf of their clients or beneficiaries. They must use their expertise and knowledge to make informed decisions and take appropriate actions. Duty to act prudently: Fiduciaries must act with prudence and skill in managing assets or property. They must make investment decisions that are consistent with the investment objectives, risk tolerance, and investment restrictions of their clients or beneficiaries. Duty to diversify: Fiduciaries must diversify investments to manage risk appropriately. They must ensure that the investment portfolio is diversified across different asset classes and sectors to minimize the impact of any single investment’s performance on the overall portfolio. Duty to disclose: Fiduciaries must provide full and complete disclosure of all material facts and information to their clients or beneficiaries. They must be transparent about their actions, decisions, and compensation. Why are fiduciary responsibilities essential? Fiduciary responsibilities are essential in the management of assets and property because they help to ensure that the interests of clients or beneficiaries are protected. Fiduciaries are entrusted with managing assets or property on behalf of someone else, and they have a legal and ethical obligation to act in the best interests of their clients or beneficiaries. Failing to uphold these responsibilities can result in financial loss, legal liability, and damage to the reputation of the fiduciary. Fiduciary responsibilities are particularly important in the management of retirement plans, trusts, and estates. Retirement plan fiduciaries, for example, have a duty to act prudently in selecting and monitoring investments and to ensure that fees and expenses are reasonable. Trust and estate fiduciaries have a duty to manage assets in accordance with the terms of the trust or will and to distribute assets to beneficiaries in a fair and equitable manner. Fiduciary responsibilities are critical in the management of assets and property on behalf of someone else. Fiduciaries have a legal and ethical obligation to act in the best interests of their clients or beneficiaries and to exercise a high level of care and diligence in carrying out their duties. By upholding these responsibilities, fiduciaries can protect the interests of their clients or beneficiaries, minimize risk, and avoid legal liability.

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Is a U.S. Housing Market Crash Inevitable?

It is almost inevitable that housing correction is coming. Most of the upswing nationally in housing prices is caused by low borrowing rates. A mortgage payment is mostly made up of three different columns 1) Principle 2) Interest 3) Other required costs of homeownership like insurance and taxes. The bulk of the payment comes from the first two.  Banks start the process by determining your “ability-to-repay” the debt. This comes to a given amount that they assume borrowers can repay, let’s say this number is $100 a month. This means you are approved if Principle, Interest, and Other Costs can come to less than $100 a month. So all of the “costs” combined need to stay below that mark, a zero-sum figure. Now as interest rates were low, the amount of the interest portion of the loan was low. Meaning more money could be freed up for the principal portion. And that principal portion is the rate at which the loan is being repaid. So if over a 360 payment loan $75 on average is getting paid in principle, the loan can retire $25,200 in debt. So the borrower can offer $25,200 for a home with faith from the bank that they will be able to repay. Thus, the buyer in the real estate auction can spend $25,200 max (and they will spend all of it).  Now if that same borrower, who can afford $100 a month in mortgage payments has to borrow in an interest rate environment that is 10% more costly than before, a rate change of borrowing from 2% to 2.2% the borrower will need to borrow from the principal repayment part of the pie. That means that the average payment they can afford to make comes down, and they will only be able to offer $21,600 when making an offer on the house. This is 14% less, after a 10% move up in borrowing costs.  This is where it will get interesting.  The “rates” that you may have heard are rising, are the percentages at which banks borrow. That money has cost banks 0.25%, since 2020. It’s made spending during the pandemic easier and lowered the cost of capital risk for banks in order to keep the money flowing. So, a bank borrowing at .25% or close to it can lend a 30-year mortgage at really low rates. Hence the sub 3% and 2% mortgage rates we saw in the last 2 years and on the heels of the 2009-2016 recovery cycle.   The by-product of this low-interest rate, high spending environment is inflation (the rising costs of goods and services). So if the cost to the bank to repay these loans increases, the cost for borrowers increases at a faster rate. So the rate of change is more than the 10% increase we discussed above. A borrower seeing their interest rate go from 2.2% to 4.4% (while still historically low) will see their capacity for repayment severely impacted. By just returning to normal lending rates the portion a borrower can repay is reduced. The borrower who could afford a $100 a month payment, now sees his buying power reduced to $9,000 over the course of the 360 mortgage payments in a 30-year mortgage. The borrower now has 41% of the buying capacity by doubling the borrowing rate, this change in the amount of borrowed capital buyers brought into the house buying equation, means that the bid sizes will invariably contract. Bringing the prices that a home clears the market down. Knock-on-effects: Inflation In the above scenario, the ignored part of the pie is the “Other.” This is mostly tax and insurance, but also includes power, water, HOA’s, and other required expenses for the ownership of a home. These costs are also climbing, and they too will erode the buying power of borrowers. This has been a largely understood space for some time, but as inflation continues to outpace wages, this will have a growing negative effect on the buyer’s ability to borrow. This is simply shifting payments from principle into insurance. What is missing from the “crash” in ‘08?: Leverage So just understanding that buyers are going to lose buying capacity in a given market doesn’t result in a crash, it just means that home prices will contract. What is still missing in this equation is selling pressures.  The housing crisis wasn’t just the rising cost of home prices, it was also the deterioration of credit quality borrowers, and excess leverage. As the housing market of the early 2000s looks eerily similar in growth, an important distinction is made between the two when we look at the leverage ratio of borrowers. This is a result of the bad actors in the housing crisis leveraging one house with another, and another, and another. This allowed the rampant contagion of home selling. One default in the leverage on leverage structure meant that a single default meant 2 or more defaults as a result. The low credit quality and poor borrowing strategies (adjustable rate mortgages, and subprime lending) meant that all borrowing became interconnected. Now while the current system has become somewhat lax on the underwriting standards again, the use of adjustable mortgages and equity requirements for vacation and second homes remains largely intact. Limiting the contagion of contraction to single borrowers. What is missing from the “crash” in ‘08?: Employment Employment is well below 4% and that is encouraging. That means that there is plenty of demand for workers and that if a borrower is qualified when they are employed, the risk of losing that employment is at its lowest point ever. Broadly speaking this means that it’s worth keeping an eye on, but will limit the amount of forced selling that could trigger a true “crash”. 

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest