InSight

Market InSights:

Second COVID-19 Stimulus Niceties and Notes

We have an agreement, which means we can begin to criticize it and plan for the investment and economic effects. The bill is a litany of half measures, no long term solutions, and likely sets up a couple of battles in the next congress. 

Congress punted on evictions, postponing medical payments until early next year, and there is still an ongoing debate regarding the amount it is issuing in direct payments. The looming liability concern for businesses is still being discussed.

Here is what got done: 

Individual payments for many

Easily the most asked about part of the legislation is the direct payment to individuals that begin going out today. The passed version included $600 going to individual adults with an adjusted gross income of up to $75,000 a year based on 2019 earnings.

An increased amount will be going to those that file as heads of households who earn up to $112,500 and couples (or someone whose spouse died in 2020) who make up to $150,000 a year would get twice that amount.

This continuing political battle to raise this number from $600 to $2000 is still going on today, passing with all democrat and some republican support in the house. The senate is questionable as a few Republicans have endorsed the idea, including the two high profile candidates in Georgia – Loeffler, and Purdue.

McConnell has blocked the bill as of 10:20 am as I am writing this article. 

Unemployment benefits

With almost 7% of Americans still unemployed and millions more under-employed, Congress acted to extend multiple programs to help those out of work, albeit at less generous levels than in the spring. Too much of the surprise of those tracking the issue, the final bill doesn’t include the expanded coffers many anticipated and is considered a skinny agreement. 

The agreement would include:

  • 11 weeks, providing a lifeline for hard-hit workers until March 14. 
  • Up to $300 per week (half the amount provided by the original stimulus bill in the spring)
  • Pandemic Unemployment Assistance — a program aimed at a broad set of freelancers and independent contractors — for the same period, providing an additional $100 per week

Better late than never, the expanded agreement is a second band-aid for those Americans that continue to seek employment as employers have halted hiring. The near term negative effect of unemployment cannot be understated. But as we look out to the intermediate (6 months) range seems to hold a fantastic capacity for consumers to unwind pent up spending in short order. The unemployment insurance isn’t expected to be much but will support many Americans who put more and more spending on credit cards in the second half of the year. 

Funds for Child Care, Schools, and Colleges

School budgets have been uniquely impacted by the pandemic and have left their outlook for the year to some impaired:

  • $82 billion for education and education service providers, 
  • That figure includes $54 billion for stabilizing K-12 schools
  • It also includes $23 billion for colleges and universities
  • $10 billion for the child care industry

K-12 schools saw more support than the initial package in dollar terms, and even more than the proposed package in November; however, the funds still fall short of what both sectors say they need to blunt the effect of the pandemic and to support operations in 2021. 

The majority of school districts transitioned to remote learning and as a result, we were asked to make expensive adjustments to accommodate while seeing enrollment drops upend budgets. Colleges and universities are also facing financial constraints amid rising expenses and falling revenue.

Child care centers that are struggling with reduced enrollment or closures will get help to stay open and continue paying their staff. The funds are also supposed to help families struggling with tuition payments for early childhood education. 

Funding for broadband infrastructure

The stress on national broadband has been higher than ever, remote work and education on top of the expanded requirements of technologies like Zoom, have put a major strain on national networks. The legislation includes $7 billion for expanding access to high-speed internet connections. Much of this spending was anticipated in an infrastructure bill, that has been brought forward as a result of the pandemic. Two major points in this part:

  • Half this stimulus is earmarked to cover the cost of monthly internet bills by providing up to $50 per month to low-income families.
  • $300 million for building out infrastructure in underserved rural areas and $1 billion in grants for tribal broadband programs. (Part of another infrastructure bills spending prior to the pandemic) 

Extension of aid for small businesses (PPP)

The bill puts forward $285 billion for additional loans to small businesses under the Paycheck Protection Program. This renews the program created under the initial stimulus legislation and is largely an extension of dollars that were repurposed.

Funding for vaccines and eldercare facilities

The source of concern early in the pandemic and the ongoing requirements to overhaul the elderly care facilities are addressed by this legislation as it sets aside nearly $70 billion for a range of public health measures targeted at elderly care facilities and the distribution of the vaccine. This breakdown includes: 

  • $20 billion for the purchase of vaccines 
  • $8 billion for vaccine distribution 
  • $20 billion to help states continue their test-and-trace program
  • Earmarked funds to cover emergency loans aimed at helping hard-hit eldercare centers.

A ban on surprise medical bills

The Bill supports efforts to help Americans avoid unexpected medical bills that can result from visits to hospitals. The legislation also makes it illegal for hospitals to charge patients for services like emergency treatment by out-of-network doctors or transport in air ambulances, which patients often have no say about. This measure has had some long time support from Democrats and was criticized for not including some provision in the Affordable Care Act. 

Rental protections

One more month of halting evictions is pushed out to the end of January. The Department of Housing and Urban Development separately issued a similar moratorium on Monday that protects homeowners against foreclosures on mortgages backed by the Federal Home Administration. It runs until Feb. 28. This has had several enforcement issues and while the legislation is a fantastic lipservice, the issues of evictions for individuals with a history of rental disqualification from before the pandemic are a continued source of evictions.

The bill DOES NOT include liability protection for business

A criticism by many that Democrats largely held out a provision for liability protection for companies trying to reopen. This element, opposed by labor unions and supported by the national Chamber of Commerce was a sticking point that went without inclusion. The discussion was important because it would allow businesses to follow their local recommendations to reopen to have legal insolation from lawsuits later on. This will continue to be a discussion in congress as a “reopen” is structured and the liabilities for business owners regarding COVID exposures are defined. 

Conclusion:

This gets us through the winter and hopefully the hump of COVID as the vaccine gets rolled out. It still leaves too much for the 2021 congress to cover and cover quickly. What the continued political, monetary, and fiscal landscape reactions look like is still up for debate. The curvature of risk in equities peaks in February (as I write this) so markets are pricing in a 2 month include equities and a political battle come early spring.

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

What to know about investments in office space

Investing in office buildings can be a lucrative opportunity for investors, but it also comes with its share of drawbacks and risks. Let’s take a closer look at some of the benefits and drawbacks of investing in office buildings. Benefits: Steady income stream: Office buildings can provide a steady income stream through rent payments from tenants. These payments can be a reliable source of income for investors. The creditworthiness of the tenants can be easier to determine and there is more resource for making sure they pay owed rent. Potential for appreciation: As the value of the property increases over time, investors can realize gains through appreciation. Office buildings have always been a part of the landscape, recently Covid-19 has thrown a wrench in the demand for office buildings, but the long-term expectation is that more, maybe different looking, office space will always have an interested buyer. Tax benefits: Investors can deduct expenses such as property taxes, mortgage interest, and depreciation from their taxable income. Control: Investors have a greater degree of control over their investments, including selecting tenants, setting rental rates, and making improvements to the property. Drawbacks: Market fluctuations: The demand for office space can fluctuate with economic conditions, which can affect the rental rates and occupancy levels of the property. Tenant turnover: Tenant turnover can lead to vacancies and decreased rental income. Capital expenditures: Office buildings require maintenance and occasional renovations, which can be costly and impact cash flow. Location: The location of the office building can significantly impact its value and potential for rental income. The most exciting benefit of investing in office buildings is the potential for a steady income stream and appreciation over time. However, the cap rate, or the ratio of net operating income to property value, should be carefully evaluated to ensure a good return on investment. Generally, a higher cap rate indicates a better return on investment, but this can vary depending on the location and condition of the property. There is a moderate level of risk involved in investing in office buildings. Economic conditions can impact the demand for office space and tenant turnover can lead to vacancies. However, careful due diligence and evaluation of market conditions can help mitigate these risks. An investment in office buildings can offer a reliable income stream and potential for appreciation, but it also comes with risks and drawbacks. Careful evaluation of the property and market conditions can help investors make informed decisions and maximize their returns.

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Tax Mitigation Playbook: What is a 1031 Exchange?

1031 exchange is one of the most popular tax strategies available when selling and buying real estate “held for productive use in a trade or business or investment”. It allows the owner of a property to exchange one asset for another. Our clients uses this strategy to: Scale Up – by increasing the size of their real estate portfolio – by swapping a smaller asset for a larger asset and adding leverage or cash to increase their total investment. Combine assets – by selling several small properties to own a single large asset. Relocate – Assets like property are stationary, life is not. If you own a property you cannot easily see you expose yourself to risks you can easily avoid. Diversify – by selling a single asset to take a stake in a DST or more diversified real estate partnership. Scale Down – by selling their rental property and replacing it with a stake in a partnership with lower personal management requirements. Scale Out – by swapping an asset for a stake in a partnership that will allow them to sell smaller parts at their desired pace A 1031 exchange, also called a like-kind exchange, abbreviated in some cases as LKE, is the result of a landmark legal decision of T.J. Starker v. U.S., 602 F. 2d 1341 (9th Cir. 1979). Starker v. U.S. is a significant development of the 1031 tax exchange rules. It was in this case that, the Ninth Circuit Court held that non-simultaneous 1031 exchanges were permissible and set the precedent for the current 180 day non-simultaneous, delayed tax-deferred like-kind exchange transactions. Also referred to as a Starker Exchange. Starker Trust, or tax-deferred exchange, was first authorized in 1921 when Congress recognized the importance of encouraging reinvestment in business assets. Today, taxpayers use 1031 exchanges to increase cash flow by deferring taxes on gains realized through the sale of real estate, as long as they reinvest those gains in the replacement property. In practical terms, a taxpayer sells a property used for business or investment to exchange for another property also for use in business or investment. When transacting an exchange, the taxpayer never receives nor controls the funds from the sale of their relinquished property. The funds are directly used to purchase the replacement property. This is Key: Because the taxpayer never actually gains the proceeds from the sale, they may defer the tax they would pay if they simply sold a property and kept the money.

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Can I run a canna-business in an Opportunity Zone?

Like many things in life, the answer here is “it’s complicated” and it’s going to depend heavily on the type of business you intend to operate. Let’s start with the good news as we unfold this potential boon to marijuana investors and store operators.  It was left out of the law in 2017 While traditional ‘sin’  businesses were left included in the list of banned practices inside of opportunity zones, the recent ecosystem of cannabis-based businesses was left out. Some camps argue that because marijuana is still federally illegal, banning the business in the federal tax code would be redundant. Other camps have argued that leaving out the fledgling marijuana business is not an accident. I leave the interpretation and enforcements back in the hand of individual states which are currently choosing their course across the country. Additionally, if the law intended to expressly prohibit these practices it would have been easy to include clear language in their prohibition along with the other “sin” businesses. Its absence, then we feel, puts the interpretation and execution on the part of the states along with their maps and other eligibility determinations the states created. It fits with the goals of the Opportunity Zone scheme It’s hard to deny that the economic development that has accompanied legalization for both recreational and medicinal has been impressive. Cities have seen otherwise defunct warehouses, factories, and industrial storage facilities gain new life in the wake of legalization. Cultivation facilities, infrastructure vendors, fertilizer and chemical businesses, and retail outlets have all sprouted up in places that cities and states have written off as low-economic zones. This organic economic activity marries very well with the state objectives of the Opportunity Zone programs.  The business would still be heavily regulated and approved Given the regulatory environment surrounding the cannabis industry, both the business licenses and the location would be apparent to the state. I think it would be hard to argue that if the business operated with the approval and regulatory oversight regime set up by the state that could somehow void it from participation in the OZ. Everything would be above board with the state  The opportunity set is encouraging Because the industry is becoming far more than just the dispensary, this industry is wrapping its tendrils into several infrastructure needs that are required to make the supply chain work. Many of these businesses operate outside the traditional retail environment that draws so much eyre from municipalities and federal agencies. While the cannabis storefronts are the most visible component of the ecosystem, the most critical is cultivation and storage. These businesses look more like traditional chemical and agricultural supply companies and indoor growth facilities. It’s these businesses that might be able to transcend the negative attention typically associated with marijuana and still be a high profit, high impact role in the industry. Seemingly combining the core infrastructure needs, and the potential tax advantages of an OZ, and avoiding the regulatory and political concerns. This has led investors to believe that supply chain and cultivation operations might be the “safer bet” in this space and that retail might be too similar in operations to liquor stores which are prohibited. The Former Treasury Secretary said an unofficial “no” Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin advised in May 2019 that funds that operate in a Qualified Opportunity Zone “should not be used to invest in cannabis” but followed up with no formal direction from the treasury. Similarly, we are left to interpret the opinions of the new Treasury Secretary Yellen who has yet to officially comment on this program. It is my opinion that with bigger “fish to fry” in the wake of the pandemic the treasury will not be looking for more ways to shut down business formation, much less in areas that require the economic development encouraged by the OZ scheme.   Bottom line, we feel that if the regulatory environment is followed effectively, and that there are no policy changes from the IRS or Treasury that the development of cannabis businesses will thrive in this tax environment. But as always, investments that push through the crevices should only be approached by those with the risk appetite for both regulatory, legal, and market-based risks.  

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest