InSight

What about ‘Taxmageddon’ should you be worried about?

Financial Planning Dentist

What about ‘Taxmageddon’ should you be worried about?

For years, the common belief has been that taxes, particularly income taxes, will be lower in the future for workers. That differing tax into the future almost always meant keeping more money in your pocket. But now, maybe not. The lower individual federal income tax rates ushered in by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) are already scheduled to expire at the end of 2025. But with Biden’s November victory that looks to change sooner rather than later. We think the most likely and probably the best-case scenario would be a return to the pre-TCJA deal starting in 2021. This means a reversion for most earners to pay the same rates they were in 2016 and the decade prior. For many, this means about 2-3% higher taxes in their effective tax rate.

The worst-case scenario we anticipate would include higher rates on ordinary income. And higher rates on dividends and long-term capital gains too, which are currently taxed at 0%, 15%, 18.8%, 20%, and 23.8%. These rates, often criticized as being far lower than the income rate, are likely to see some changes. Both in the top-line rates, with Bidens’ opening bid raising that to the ordinary income rate. It’s very likely to see the benefits of such a low tax threshold become a source of change. 

The next, worst-case scenario will be if Washington includes eliminating more write-offs for individual taxpayers, while simultaneously subjecting all wages and self-employment income to the dreaded Social Security tax. This would be 6.2% withheld from employee paychecks but 12.4% from self-employment income. A major change for independent contractors and the self-employed.

 

The absolute worst-case scenario that we can imagine for investors and workers, is that most or all of these changes, and more, are imposed retroactively. Meaning that the damage has already been done and that the proposed changes could be from as early as the start of 2021 (unlikely but possible) or from the proposal of the legislation which could mean the changes are in effect as early as May of 2021.

What should we be doing if ‘Taxmageddon’ is real?

First, make some assumptions for what your income is going to be over the next 3-5 years. This will help you uncover some of the tax issues for those in the highest two tax brackets. If you are individually making more than $207,000 or jointly making $414,700 you should be reworking your assets today, to be able to handle the coming changes. 

One of the oddest recommendations, as alluded to above, is that if you’re traditionally differing taxes, is to realize some gains sooner rather than later. This might be a first for many investors who have not seen a tax increase, particularly one that affects the capital gains process.

Additional Resources for 'Taxmageddon'

Tax Mitigation Playbook

Opportunity Zone
Overview

Taxmageddon

Tax-smart moves that don’t involve tax deferral

Tax-smart moves that don’t involve tax deferral There are several methods that tax planners can use that are not part of the tax deferral strategy category and that might find new and improved legs as this change happens.   Contribute to your Roth IRA Qualified withdrawals from Roth IRAs are federal-income-tax-free, so Roth accounts offer the opportunity for outright tax avoidance. This strategy looks even more impressive as you can pay income tax at today’s lower tax regime, and mitigate any future taxes that will preserve the gains. Additionally, because the account avoids all capital gains tax this vehicle becomes the most promising to see capital gains on, but avoid the tax consequences of selling those assets. Making annual contributions to a Roth IRA is an attractive option for those who expect to pay higher tax rates during retirement.  Convert to a Roth IRA Converting a traditional IRA into a Roth account effectively allows you to prepay the federal income tax bill on your current IRA account. This account also allows you to see the assets grow tax-free. This method is capable of avoiding ramifications from capital gains and provides the necessary insurance from the rising tax rates. This is the only method that straddles both of the coming complications. Determining the amount to convert (all or partial) should be worked into your financial plan.  Contribute to Roth 401(k) The Roth 401(k) is a traditional 401(k) plan with a Roth account feature added. If your employer offers a 401(k) plan with the Roth option, you can contribute after-tax dollars. If your employer doesn’t currently offer the option, run, don’t walk, to campaign for one immediately. There is likely little cost to add such a program and this might be an oversight on the needs employees should convey to the plan sponsor.  The DRA (Designated Roth Account) is a separate account from which you can eventually take federal-income-tax-free qualified withdrawals. So, making DRA contributions is another attractive alternative for those who expect to pay higher tax rates during retirement. Note that, unlike annual Roth IRA contributions, your right to make annual ‘Designated Roth Account (DRA) contributions is not phased out at higher income levels. Key point: If your employer offers the Roth 401(k) option, it’s too late to take advantage of the 2019 tax year, but 2020 is fair game. For 2020, the maximum allowable DRA contribution is $19,500. Contribute to Health Savings Account (HSA) Because withdrawals from HSAs are federal-income-tax-free when used to cover qualified medical expenses, HSAs offer the opportunity for outright tax avoidance, as opposed to tax deferral. You must have qualifying high-deductible health insurance coverage and no other general health coverage to be eligible for HSA contributions. You can claim deductions for HSA contributions even if you don’t itemize. More good news: the HSA contribution privilege is not lost just because you happen to be a high earner. Even billionaires can make deductible contributions if they have qualifying high-deductible health coverage. Additional Resources for ‘Taxmageddon’ Tax Mitigation Playbook Download Opportunity ZoneOverview

Read More »

More related articles:

Boulder Financial Advisors
Articles
Kevin Taylor

The AI Showdown: Unveiling the Global Race for Technological Supremacy

The global AI race between the United States and China has been a prominent topic in recent years, as both countries strive to establish themselves as leaders in artificial intelligence. This competition has spurred significant investments in AI research, development, and infrastructure, with particular emphasis on chips and AI technologies. The United States, with its long-standing tradition of technological innovation, has been at the forefront of AI advancements. American tech giants such as Google, Microsoft, and IBM have heavily invested in AI research and development, establishing themselves as key players in the industry. The U.S. government has also recognized the strategic importance of AI and has taken steps to support its growth through funding initiatives, regulatory frameworks, and collaborations between academia and industry. On the other hand, China has rapidly emerged as a formidable competitor in the AI race. The Chinese government has set ambitious goals to become the global leader in AI by 2030, outlining plans to invest heavily in research and development, talent acquisition, and infrastructure. China’s large population and vast consumer market provide a fertile ground for AI implementation, leading to the proliferation of AI-powered applications in various sectors such as e-commerce, finance, and healthcare. Chinese companies like Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent have made significant advancements in AI technologies and have been actively expanding their influence both domestically and globally. Chips play a critical role in AI development, as they form the foundation for powering AI algorithms and applications. The United States and China have recognized the strategic importance of chip manufacturing and have made substantial investments in this area. The U.S. semiconductor industry has long been a global leader, with companies like Intel, Nvidia, and Qualcomm driving innovation. However, China has been making significant efforts to reduce its reliance on foreign chip technology and establish its domestic semiconductor industry. The Chinese government has invested billions of dollars in supporting local chip manufacturers and fostering collaborations with international semiconductor companies. Both the United States and China understand that AI has far-reaching implications, not only in terms of economic growth but also for national security and military applications. AI technologies have the potential to enhance military capabilities, automate warfare systems, and drive advancements in autonomous weapons. As a result, there is a growing concern about an arms race in AI between these two superpowers. To support their respective AI ambitions, both countries have also been investing in military-related AI research and development. The United States has established the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) and is actively exploring the integration of AI into defense systems. Similarly, China has made significant investments in military AI applications, with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) focusing on areas such as autonomous vehicles, intelligent surveillance, and battlefield decision-making systems. It is important to note that while the United States and China are at the forefront of the global AI race, other countries and regions are also making significant strides in AI research and development. Countries like Canada, the United Kingdom, and Germany, among others, have their own AI initiatives and are fostering innovation in this field. As the competition intensifies, the United States and China must balance their pursuit of technological dominance with ethical considerations, transparency, and international collaboration. The development and deployment of AI technologies should be guided by principles that prioritize human rights, privacy, and accountability. By fostering a cooperative approach, global collaboration can drive the responsible and beneficial use of AI, benefiting society as a whole. The global AI race between the United States and China presents various investment opportunities and potential conflicts. Let’s explore them further: Investment Opportunities: AI Research and Development: Both the United States and China are investing heavily in AI research and development. This creates opportunities for companies and startups specializing in AI technologies, algorithms, and applications. Funding and partnerships from government agencies, venture capital firms, and tech giants can fuel innovation and growth in this sector. Semiconductor Industry: The development of AI requires high-performance chips, and investment in the semiconductor industry is crucial. Companies involved in chip manufacturing, design, and fabrication, as well as those focused on AI-specific chips, can benefit from the increased demand for advanced semiconductor technology. AI Infrastructure: The race to develop robust AI infrastructure, including cloud computing, data centers, and network capabilities, offers investment opportunities. Building scalable and secure infrastructure to handle the vast amounts of data and computational requirements of AI applications is a key focus area. AI Startups and Incubators: The growing interest in AI creates a fertile ground for startups and incubators specializing in AI technologies. Investors can identify promising startups and provide funding, mentoring, and resources to help them flourish. These startups can offer disruptive AI solutions in various sectors, presenting attractive investment opportunities. Conflicts and Challenges: Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer: The competition between the United States and China can lead to intellectual property disputes, as both countries strive to protect their AI advancements. Issues related to technology transfer, trade secrets, and patent infringements may arise, potentially leading to conflicts and legal battles. Talent Acquisition and Retention: Both countries face challenges in attracting and retaining top AI talent. The demand for skilled AI professionals exceeds the current supply, creating a talent shortage. This talent competition can result in wage inflation, poaching of experts, and brain drain from certain regions, leading to conflicts and talent imbalances. Ethical Considerations: As AI technology advances, ethical considerations become increasingly important. Conflicts may arise when different countries or organizations have divergent views on the ethical use of AI, particularly in areas such as privacy, bias, algorithmic transparency, and autonomous weapons. Establishing international standards and regulations to address these concerns can be a complex and contentious process. National Security and Military Applications: The militarization of AI can heighten conflicts between nations. Developing AI for military applications, such as autonomous weapons and cyber warfare, raises concerns about arms races and the potential for escalating tensions. Striking a balance between innovation and ensuring responsible use of AI in the military domain is crucial to

Read More »

Definitions: Fixed Income

Fixed Income (or debt) represents your ownership over the repayment of a debt. Usually considered bonds, they are contracts promising the repayment of loaned money. Other forms of debt arrangements include Mortgage-Backed Securities, liens, loans, and CDs. Fixed income is called that because the return is decided on the outset – so the return is fixed from the initial offering. Because the upside is fixed from the start, the change in their pricing is less dramatic. Thus, fixed income pricing becomes less about the asset itself, and more about the prevailing rates for other options (read “current interest rate environment”). Debt is usually priced based on three variables, 1) How likely you are going to get your debt repaid, who owes the borrowed money, and what is the way they will pay it back? (Taxation, revenue, etc.) 2) how long until you are repaid your initial investment, this is called duration and indicates how long the money is at risk for. 3) the rate that the debtor is paying on the borrowed sum, usually expressed percentage as a coupon or yield. There are subcategories based on who the entity requesting the money fall into: Muni’s  – a Districts or Municipalities Debt. Usually issued to fund special projects, schools, or city and municipal improvements. In addition to the yield, these are priced for risk based on cities’ credit history, the source they plan to repay the loan (taxation or toll-based), and any available insurance they put on the bonds. Treasuries – the sovereign debt of a country. This is debt usually supported by the taxing authority of a country and its ability to create (fiat) the money they need. This is priced based on the credit rating of the country, the outlook of its currency, and the yield. Corporate – debt issued by companies and priced based on their creditworthiness. These are divided into investment grade and non-investment grade (called affectionately “high yield”) and then subdivided further. Certified Deposits (CD’s) – debt issued by banks. These are usually issued in small increments and for a short duration. The returns are insured by the FDIC (federal government) Mortgages (MBS) – These are backed by the creditworthiness of the borrower, and usually the risk is mitigated by grouping a pool of mortgages into tranches based on their collective credit rating. Collateralized Debt Obligations (CLOs) – Similar to the mortgages, this is a collection of debts that secure equipment or are backed by specialty financial arrangements.  Often backed by the repossession of accounts receivable or equipment.  

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest