What is the CIMA® Designation?

Mandatory vs. Voluntary designations?

Several of the designations involved in our industry are often associated with being a mark of distinction. Series exams, for example, are often cited as a way clients will understand the legitimacy of their advisor. And while there are differences in the varied series designations they’re all more accurately described as mandatory designations. These exams allow people to carry out certain sales activities and securities actions in compliance with state and federal laws.

Voluntary designations, by contrast, show an advanced understanding and often years of study into specific technical, strategic, and legal strategies that arise in an investor’s journey. These financial commitments often reflect an advisor’s commitment to their craft, and several of the designations have education and experience requirements that amount to years of study and difficult examination to attain. Some of these designations year in and year out have failure rates in the 35-50% range. Meaning that even after years of independent and classroom study that over a third of those in pursuit will still fail the final examination requirement.

There is a marked distinction between advisors who maintain an advanced designation and those who carry securities or insurance licenses. There will be a notable quality that should be apparent in their ethical, technical, and experiential expertise.

What is involved in the CIMA® Education?

There are only three universities that offer the core education platform for achieving a CIMA® designation. They all are required to maintain the highest ethical and educational standards to keep their standing with the Investment and Wealth Management Institute. The U.S. schools that currently offer the required education for this designation are as follows:

The University of Chicago Booth School of Business
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Yale School of Management, Yale University

The curriculum for the CIMA® designation covers five core areas of technical and experiential disciplines. The program’s core topics and content are designed to be congruent with client expectations of the roles of an investment manager or financial advisor. The current make-up for the CIMA® designation requires applicants to understand and pass the examination on the following five topic areas:

1. Fundamentals

This area covers the statistics and methods of investment analysis, applied finance and economics, and the working of global capital markets. The fundamentals of a company’s balance sheet, economic conditions, and the marketplace give investors a baseline case for evaluating a company’s cost of capital, risk and interest rate exposure, and the general health of a company.

2. Investments

Knowledge of the variable upside, risk, and performance expectations of the different vehicles is key to portfolio construction and investment advice. The proper use of Equity, Fixed Income, Alternative Investments, Options/Futures, and Real Assets can help an investor achieve a wide range of outcomes, mitigate risk, and better understand the route they want to follow.

3. Portfolio Theory and Behavioral Finance

The behavior of different investments is the first level of mastery, the advanced understanding covered in a CIMA® designation also understands the interplay between these vehicles and how usage of several correlated and uncorrelated assets can constrain risk and drive excess returns. Portfolio theory and different behavioral models in finance theory can help CIMA® advisors better match a prospect or client with a risk profile that will accommodate their expectations. Different investment philosophies and styles coupled with the right tools and strategies help clients gain the comfort of aligning their expectations with reality and help them avoid the mistakes of fear and poor judgment.

4. Risk and Return

Price discovery and the attributes of risk are an important part of the investment process. Different nuances in risk and performance measurement and attribution help CIMA® advisors uncover the right trends inside of a fund’s performance to both isolate and mitigate the unwanted risks and capture the desired exposures over long arcs of time.

5. Portfolio Construction and Consulting Process

The difference in how a CIMA® practice runs will be felt in several different ways. The Investments & Wealth Institute Code of Professional Responsibility and Ethics governs a large portion of the interactions CIMA® advisors have with their clients. This allows clients and prospects to have elevated expectations for the fiduciary and ethical touchpoints in their relationship. Client discovery, the drafting of an investment policy, and portfolio construction become great examples of how the engagement with clients looks and feels different for the investor. How an advisor documents a manager search or selection of a portfolio will help clients find a better fit and avoid the feeling of a ‘lazy portfolio assignment.’

The goal of advanced designations is to bridge the satisfaction gap

The divorce between client expectations and the relationship they have with an investment advisor is never more apparent than when asked “what do they own and why do they own it?”. Far too many investors own funds they don’t understand, and strategies they are prescribed that may fit in compliance terms, but clients cannot relate to. This creates a void where clients expect to have an understanding and comfortability with their investment decisions, but these expectations are not met by the advisor or insurance agent that they have done business with. This void creates a vacuum that is inevitably filled with fees, fear, greed, and poor decision-making. The structure prescribed in the CIMA® designation is focused on bridging that gap and further connecting the designee with the client and their goals.

More related articles:

boulder financial planning experts with 1031 tax mitigation experience

Articles

Tax Mitigation Playbook: Does a vacation home qualify for a 1031 exchange?

One of the most common questions asked is whether or not a vacation property qualifies for a 1031 exchange. There are three basic rules for including a vacation home in a 1031 exchange that was introduced by the IRS in 2008. For a vacation home to qualify as relinquished property in a 1031 exchange, first the vacation home must have been held by the taxpayer for a minimum of 24 months immediately preceding the exchange. Second, the vacation home must have been rented at fair market value for at least 14 days in each of the 12-month periods. Third, the property owner cannot have used the vacation home personally for more than 14 days or 10% of the days the home was rented out (whichever is greater) within both 12-month periods. The rules for a vacation home as a replacement property are the same as above. The property must be held for a minimum of 24 months after the close of the exchange; the property must be rented out at fair market value for at least 14 days in each 12-month period, and the taxpayer cannot use the vacation home for personal use more than 14 days or 10% of the days it was rented out (whichever is greater) in each 12-month period. There is one small exception to the days a taxpayer can use both the relinquished and replacement properties, which states that the taxpayer can use the home for personal use above and beyond the 14 days or 10% IF the overage was used to complete improvements or maintenance. If a taxpayer plans to utilize this exception, they should keep all receipts of maintenance or improvements completed during the duration of their stay, to ensure they comply with the regulations upon scrutinization. Following the rules above, a vacation property can be eligible property for a 1031 exchange. It is strongly recommended that a taxpayer contemplating a 1031 exchange involving vacation property discuss the transaction with their tax and legal counsel before doing so. The Complete Playbook

April 28, 2022 No Comments

When should I start to add bonds to my portfolio? Do I even need to when I’m older?

So bonds are in a rough spot right now to invest in. In addition, there are several historical rules I’ve encountered when discussing bonds with clients. Some examples are: Having a percentage of bonds equal to your age, so something like 60% by age 60 20% in your earning years, 30% as you transition to retirement, and 50% in retirement While these “rules” trend in the right direction for investors, they miss an important point and none of them take into account the amount of money you have, and the income requirements of the money. You should have more stability and less volatility as you need to count on that income as the sole source. But the amount of income you need will vary throughout retirement, the prevailing returns you get from bonds will change, and the duration of your bond might hinder the overall success of the portfolio. Here are a couple of things to focus on instead that will give you a better idea of how much you need to have in bonds, and at what age you should start How much money do you need your investments to produce? For example – if you have $1m in the bank and require $40,000 in income annually, you only need a 4% return. You can achieve that post-tax income from a 40/60 split in the current environment. An incredibly conservative portfolio. Begin with the end in mind. How much up and down in the portfolio can you tolerate without taking action? Some money in bonds will inevitably lower the volatility, and lower the total return Do you have the capacity to earn money from employment? This can provide cash flow to add new equity positions in down markets, like the income from bonds, do. What other sources of income are available to you? Rental income, royalties, insurance payments, etc. The more options you have to evaluate that generate an income not reliant on the equities market, the less you need bonds. Bonds are really not a cut and dry issue. To figure out how much, and which to own is absolutely a science that will be worked out with a financial plan. Knowing the income needs today, tomorrow and in the future is key. Knowing exactly what you are trying to replace with your investments why we spend so much time on spending, and cash flow parts of the InSight-Full® plan.

December 30, 2020 No Comments

risk management boulder colorado financial planners

Articles

Embracing Sustainable Investing for Risk Management and Positive Impact

In recent years, sustainable investing has gained significant momentum as investors increasingly recognize the importance of aligning financial goals with sustainability principles. While the pursuit of financial returns remains essential, a growing number of investors are incorporating risk management into their investment strategies through the lens of investment altruism. In this blog post, we will explore how investment altruism contributes to risk management while driving positive social and environmental impacts. Understanding Investment Altruism and Risk Management Investment altruism, also known as impact investing or sustainable investing, combines financial objectives with measurable positive social and environmental outcomes. By embracing this approach, investors actively seek opportunities that address sustainability challenges, mitigate risks associated with unsustainable practices, and contribute to a more sustainable future. Sustainable investing offers a risk management framework that goes beyond traditional approaches by evaluating risks through the lens of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. Mitigating Environmental Risks Climate change and environmental degradation pose significant risks to businesses and investments. Sustainable investing aims to identify companies and projects that adopt environmentally responsible practices, reducing exposure to climate-related risks, resource scarcity, and regulatory changes. By integrating ESG criteria into investment decisions, investors can gauge a company’s environmental performance, including its carbon emissions, water usage, and waste management. Investing in environmentally conscious companies helps build resilience and reduces vulnerability to environmental risks, thus safeguarding portfolios in the long run. Addressing Social Risks Social risks, such as labor practices, community relations, and supply chain management, can have a profound impact on a company’s performance and reputation. Investment altruism encourages investors to consider a company’s social impact and its commitment to ethical business practices. By incorporating ESG factors into their analysis, investors can identify companies that prioritize employee well-being, diversity and inclusion, human rights, and community engagement. This proactive approach helps mitigate social risks, build trust with stakeholders, and protect the long-term value of investments. Enhancing Governance Practices Effective governance plays a vital role in mitigating risks and ensuring sustainable business practices. Sustainable investing assesses a company’s governance structure, board diversity, executive compensation, and transparency. By investing in companies with strong governance practices, investors can reduce the risk of fraud, corruption, and unethical behavior. Robust governance frameworks enhance accountability, safeguard shareholder rights, and contribute to the overall stability and long-term success of investments. Long-Term Value Creation Investment altruism aligns with the concept of creating long-term value by integrating sustainability into investment strategies. By investing in companies that embrace sustainable practices, investors contribute to the development of resilient and forward-looking businesses. These companies are better positioned to adapt to evolving market trends, regulatory changes, and customer preferences. Sustainable investments have the potential to outperform their peers in the long run, as they are better prepared to navigate risks, seize opportunities arising from sustainability megatrends, and deliver sustainable financial returns. Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing Investment altruism thrives on collaboration and knowledge sharing among investors, corporations, policymakers, and civil society organizations. Collaborative platforms and networks facilitate the sharing of best practices, research, and insights on sustainable investment strategies. By actively engaging in these collaborations, investors gain access to a wealth of information, expand their networks, and enhance their risk management capabilities. Collectively, these efforts drive progress toward a more sustainable and resilient investment landscape. Investment altruism, with its focus on sustainable investing, offers a risk management framework that goes beyond traditional approaches. By considering environmental, social, and governance factors, investors can mitigate risks associated with climate change, social issues, and governance failures. Additionally, sustainable investments contribute to long-term value creation, as they align with market trends, customer preferences, and regulatory shifts. By collaborating and sharing knowledge, investors can strengthen their risk management capabilities and collectively drive positive change toward a more sustainable and resilient future. Embracing investment altruism not only offers financial benefits but also empowers investors to make a meaningful impact on the world.

June 6, 2023 No Comments

Investment With

InSight

What is the CIMA® Designation?

Mandatory vs. Voluntary designations?