What should I know about Bitcoin?

Financial Planning Dentist

Let me be clear from the beginning, there is a demand for a stable value, inflation-resistant currency in the world. It’s not Bitcoin. 

Bitcoin might be the first through the door, it may revolutionize the zeitgeist ways we discuss the usage of currency and it might be an early aid in getting people around the world out of using their destabilized local currencies. But it will more likely be the myspace of currencies. 

Inflation Hedge: Bitcoin can be a store of value 

Bullish Bitcoin advocates have routinely promoted the digital coin as a reliable store of value.  They are convinced the digital currency can be a store of value assets like, commodities, or currencies that maintain their value.

So many of these advocates see bitcoin as an “inflation hedge.” And while it might be, I think there is a far greater concern that it outpaced any reasonable amount of hedging it was capable of. In 2020 inflation on the CPI was 2.3%, arguing that the buying power of U.S. dollars shrunk by 2.3%, but the bitcoin rose 66%. I would contend that while a small portion of the change was the result of inflation, the other 63.7% was pure speculation.

Let’s look at other stores of value, say copper. When the price of copper increases by say 6% in a year, the first 2.3% can reliably be because the buying power of cash deteriorated in comparison to copper over the course of the year.  The 3.7% delta is due to increased demand for copper usually as a result of its utility. Thus, the increase is driven by underlying market functions for copper. I think the same argument should be made for bitcoin, that the first amount it increases in value is the result of inflation and the second is the result of speculation on inflation. The speculation element is almost 29 times higher than the inflation rate in 2020.

I think with that ratio of inflation hedging capacity to speculation being so wide it cannot be a reliable replacement for traditional inflation hedges.

Let’s then add a more practical element, Bitcoin fever is not the honest result of people hedging their inflation bets. I don’t believe most of them are concerned about the pace of inflation that they can justify a 66% run-up as a concern for the Federal Reserves’ buying rate. It’s more likely the result of seeking a high return on assets. This is then where I am truly concerned about Bitcoin (or any cryptocurrency) being considered a store of value.

Let’s then take a look at the utility of Bitcoin. Some of the value of other stores of value is that they have an intrinsic utility. Arguably, they were a reliable “store of value” before they were thought of that way by markets. Since the dawn of commerce, traders have used precious metals and industrial metals to store value. They have a legacy of usefulness. Gold was made into jewelry early, then coinage, then dentistry, and now it’s mission-critical in aerospace and technology. It has always had a drop-dead value because of its innate function. So if you were worried about the governing power that developed a currency, in 700BC or 2021, dropping to zero, the store of value would still have some intrinsic usefulness. I’m not sure the same could be said for bitcoin, because unlike other commodities and precious metals I can’t make a house with it, mold it into utensils, or wear it around my neck. Bitcoins value without its relationship to other currencies is $0.

Market Hedge: Bitcoin can hold value when markets fall

For this, I think it’s important to look at the behaviors of the people who are buying both the market and the underlying fundamentals of each. I think that it is true, that both the market and Bitcoins are inflation-hedged assets. Only one of these makes sense over time.

Additionally, we look at the correlation of the greater market to Bitcoin. In terms of volatility, like March of 2020, we saw equity high volatility in Bitcoin. In times of expansion, we see similar directionality. I think a greater, more lasting argument can be made that Bitcoin’s success and the success of the market are the results of the same underlying causes of liquidity. As we generate more money in the world, the price of assets rises, this shouldn’t be a shock. What does become a point of distinction between the two is that while Bitcoin can arguably “inflate” as long as the de facto Crypto is still Bitcoin. What it cannot do, is provide the investor cash flow in the future. The market however is the representation of ownership over future cash flows. So when markets “sell-off” there is a bottom-rung where the price of future earnings is too appealing and recruits investors back to the marketplace. With no such promise of future cash flows from bitcoin, what becomes the bottom rung? For most commodities, it becomes its intrinsic value, for Bitcoin that is $0. 

Fixed Asset: “Bitcoin is a fixed amount and there will never be more”

This is kind of an illusion. Yes, there will be a fixed amount of Bitcoins, but not a fixed amount of cryptocurrencies. Each currency type will have its own value, function, and framework. So if in the infinitely expansive ecosystem of “coinage” something comes along that can supplant the “fixed” appeal of bitcoin, and have some other benefit, the appeal of Bitcoin erodes overnight. Say for example a “fixed amount currency”, more granular than bitcoin, or fixed amount and acceptable in Costco whatever the case is, becomes the Bitcoin+ currency of choice. 

Then it becomes a question of “How long will people accept my bitcoin?” and then it’s a run for the door trying to not be the last person holding a tulip. The race will become how many Bitcoin+ will I be able to exchange for my Bitcoin. So the argument that it’s “digital gold” is valid until there is a “digital gold platinum edition” and I think that is likely infinitely regressive. So as long the currency has no intrinsic value, it is left only to contend on its speculative value. The speculative value right now is largely based on vanity, its appeal, its “newness” and once the celebrity value shifts to the next new version, the value erodes quickly. 

Bitcoin is “digital gold” becomes true until Elon Musk tweets “Bitcoin+ is digital platinum”…then the party is over.  

User Adoption: “Bitcoin is becoming more popular with retailers by the day”

This is the only kind of true. I’m seeing more and more companies “take bitcoin” but I don’t see them keeping Bitcoin. Several of those transactions are being almost instantly converted to cash. Several of the companies “taking bitcoin” are only using it at the transaction level, then making a second transaction into cash to dollars so they can continue to run the business. At some point, the chain of cash flow defaults into the dollar to keep the wheel rolling. This limits the bitcoin use to a single transaction. Unlike the dollar which is routinely used at the retail transaction, then again at the supplier level, banking all the way to the top levels in capital markets. 

As long as Bitcoin cannot safely be channeled up through the business it will suffer from transaction fees and other erosive legal and tax measures on the way to the bottom line. In the long term, the risk of capital loss through the balance sheet is still greater than using cash.

Future Currency: “Bitcoin will be used in the future”

Maybe…but I’m not so sure it has a fixed resource like Bitcoin. While I think some kind of digital currency has a fantastic transactional value for the future, I’m not sold that it’s because of the limited supply of bitcoin. We have several resources in the world that have a fixed supply, and they have been moved to the sidelines for ease of using the currency. 

There has always been a demand for a reliable supply of currency. Through the years it’s been ducats, doubloons, pounds sterling, and now the U.S. Dollar. But three common characteristics of those currencies are 1) that the power that created them was a reliable place to do business 2) they were the economic authority of the time 3) they were all replaced by a currency that possessed more reliable markets.

Regarding the first, it was part of the appeal of currency, that if I sold a piece of property (a real asset) in St. Augustine in 1500, that I could go back to Spain the following year, and the doubloon I used to transact had a predictable deliberate value. The issue with Bitcoin is that those swings are far too wild to be used to sell anything of value. You could buy a pizza in 2010 for 10,000 bitcoins and ten years later that pizza now has a value of $525m. I think while this story is humorous, it should highlight a more serious concern for anyone willing to use the currency. Sellers of real assets and buyers of bitcoin should always be concerned about the near-term risk of loss when the currency changes in value. Each side of the transaction should have a reasonable expectation that they are on the right side of the trade, for them. The real asset seller and bitcoin buyer should have an expectation they can buy something else later with the same or greater value. And the real asset buyer and bitcoin seller should have an expectation they can profit from the ownership of the real asset (land etc.). While I’m confident in the landowner’s future capacity, I don’t think that the bitcoin holder has the same expectation.

Imagine if you will, that Rome only minted 1000 gold bricks weighing 1000 pounds each for its currency…they would have been hard to traffic and harder to transact. I would be forced to shave off 10 slivers to buy an acre, 1 to buy a goat, and getting as granular as saying a meal would be impossible. Then because I’ve carved up the brick, it actually has a risk on the secondary market as a fraction of the minted (pristine) brick. I think this is a long-term issue for Bitcoin if it’s a bunch of fractional ownership of the denominated brick, and it lacks long-term authority to adopt a more useful framework. Then my concern is that Madrid comes along and mints 1m single coins and they can transact in a more fluid way. I think there is a very real risk of a more commercially viable “coin” in the pipe.

What happens if Bitcoin Wins: Everyone is now in, what?

Let’s say Bitcoin wins and becomes a trafficked and reliable currency. Then Bitcoin becomes the core and not the fringe element. As a fringe player, it gets the luxury of criticizing the status quo for its shortcomings. But what happens when it is a status quo currency and has to defend itself? The central governments of the world have several legal and economic handles they can pull to make themselves valuable and to control the use of their currency. They can increase supply, decrease supply, mandate usage, and taxes disproportionately threaten anything to keep the use of the currency and the attached economy intact.

With no central authority for Bitcoin, the currency becomes untethered. If it becomes too valuable to be used at all there is no supply coming to arrest the valuation. If the governments of the world view it as a threat there is no governing or taxing authority to deal with it. And if it hit $0 there is no way to necessitate it. Countries of the world have had experience with this decision that was made by the authorities of the world. Germany for example saw the Deutschmarks become worthless on the heels of the first world war. It then regrouped the treasury, redenominated bonds and notes to gold, and could restabilize currency in Germany. All as the results of government decision-making on both sides of their inflation issue.

So while treasuries and central banks of the world have the decision-making authority to cause a problem like hyperinflation, they also have the administrative tools to correct it or replace it.

More related articles:

Investment Policy Statement (IPS), fiduciary professional, Investment Policy Statement (IPS) process and fiduciary process
Kevin Taylor

Why a Investment Policy Statement (IPS) is an essential part of investment governance?

An Investment Policy Statement (IPS) is a vital document that outlines the guidelines for investment decisions within an individual financial plan, or as part of the efforts of a business, trust, or family office. This document is critical because it provides a framework for how investments should be managed, who is responsible for making decisions, and what the investment objectives are. Creating an IPS requires careful consideration and collaboration between investors and fiduciaries. In this blog post, we will discuss what to include in an IPS, how to draft it, and the critical questions that investors should discuss. These articles will help discuss important parts of the Investment Policy Process and draft an IPS: What to include in an Investment Policy Statement? How to draft an Investment Policy Statement? Critical questions that investors should discuss What are the Fiduciary Responsibilities? When creating an Investment Policy Statement (IPS) for a trust or family office, it is essential to use a fiduciary process and an Accredited Investment Fiduciary (AIF®). An IPS outlines the investment objectives, risk tolerance, and guidelines for managing assets or property on behalf of a client or beneficiary. The fiduciary process and AIF® help ensure that the IPS is created with the highest level of care and diligence and that the interests of the client or beneficiary are protected. A fiduciary process is a structured approach to managing assets or property that emphasizes transparency, accountability, and adherence to fiduciary responsibilities. This process includes four key steps: (1) establish investment objectives and goals, (2) develop an investment strategy, (3) implement the investment strategy, and (4) monitor and evaluate the investment strategy’s performance. By following the fiduciary process, fiduciaries can make informed decisions based on the client or beneficiary’s needs and objectives, and minimize the risk of conflicts of interest or other ethical breaches. An Accredited Investment Fiduciary (AIF®) is a professional who has completed specialized training and certification in fiduciary standards and best practices. AIF®s have demonstrated their knowledge and expertise in managing assets or property on behalf of clients or beneficiaries and upholding their fiduciary responsibilities. By working with an AIF®, fiduciaries can ensure that their IPS is created with the highest level of care and diligence and that they are complying with industry best practices and regulatory requirements. In conclusion, using a fiduciary process and an Accredited Investment Fiduciary (AIF®) is critical when drafting an Investment Policy Statement (IPS) for a trust or family office. These tools help ensure that the IPS is created with the highest level of care and diligence and that the interests of the client or beneficiary are protected. By following a structured process and working with a qualified professional, fiduciaries can manage assets or property in accordance with best practices and fiduciary standards.

Read More »
starting your dental career
Peter Locke

Starting your Dental Career

How can you get to the point where you’re ready to own your own dentist practice and begin starting your dental career. You’re a freshly minted DDS or DMD and you’re feeling great. Finally you can start making some money and living your best life. You have plenty of options from an employer standpoint but you also have a dream of owning your own dental practice. This crossroad is a pivotal one. One that can shape what the next handful of years look like. The idea of taking on more debt makes you sick but so does working for someone else that doesn’t share your vision.  As a young dentist you’re just trying to pay their bills and be in a more stable environment so you can provide yourself a reasonable lifestyle. If you live in a place you anticipate being for more than 3-5 years then you may even be considering purchasing a home. But regardless of your short term desires for the type of lifestyle you want your next decision is crucial to starting your dental career. Let’s consider the pros and cons of both working for a well established dental practice and owning your own.  When you graduate the first thing you want to do is get an income, a place, and a car. You may want to go out to more dinners and drinks with friends because you’re finally free. You’ve worked incredibly hard and dedicated yourself to studying and working for a number of years and it’s time to enjoy some financial freedom. Joining a well established practice is a great decision for those that dont have the entrepreneurial mindset and want to be great dentists without the added responsibilities of owning something. You can collect a nice income almost immediately and start doing the things you’ve always wanted to do. With a great starting income and benefits this path is actually a great place to be. For a lot of dentists, you can pick your own hours, not work 40 hours, and have no responsibilities outside of continuing education and being a great employee. In fact, for the majority of people, this is the path to choose. Starting salaries for an associate dentist is usually between $100,000-$150,000 which is a very comfortable lifestyle. If you’re a diligent saver and frugal spender, in the long run you may be financially better off as you know how to live within your means.  For those that went through school and thought that working for someone else wasn’t for them and owning a practice was the way to go, the decision to start your own practice and starting your dental career is both easy and daunting.  If your goal is to build a lot of wealth and be your own boss then you should consider owning your own practice. However, this decision should not be taken lightly. The biggest mistake I see small business owners make is the decision to branch off on your own because they’re simply good at what they do. Unfortunately, being good at something doesn’t make you a CEO. Every year, over 1 million individuals in the U.S. start a business and at the end of the year at least 40% of them have failed, and if that’s not already bad, 80% within 5 years fail. If you think the odds aren’t too bad, of that remaining bunch, over the next five years 80% of them fail.  Running a business takes a lot of effort but when done correctly offer some of the greatest benefits the business world has to offer. There is a reason that the wealthiest people in the world are business owners that took a big risk but took the right steps along the way to be successful. So, if your mindset isn’t a growth mindset with a long term goal to become wealthy personally or financially or both then making this leap might not be for you. The average dentist start-up losses $5,000 in the first year.  Graduating dentists are typically focused on getting rid of debt due to a lack of information and the group think mentality. This unfortunately leads a large number of people that are highly skilled and creative to not start their own business. Professors and parents throughout your life tell you to get a good education so you can get a good job. For leaders, this can be some of the best and worst advice you can get. Getting a job and making a career are different. My advice is to not let debt drive your decision.  *Read our article or listen to our podcast on debt and the difference between accretive and erosive debt. Graduating dentists have the option with how they pay their debt off when they graduate. Taking the time to run an analysis is imperative before making this decision and a financial planner can help with this decision. Just because you don’t have assets does not mean you should not hire a planner. In fact, it’s probably the best decision you can make as the long term effects it can have can define the type of life you live later in life. Although we understand that it’s extremely difficult to think about retirement when you’re 21 years old.  Most graduates will choose an income based repayment plan. This means you will pay 10-15% of current income towards your debt. So for those entrepreneurs who chose starting your dental career and run their own business practice, you essentially have permission to pause those payments if you make little to no money. Easiest way to deal with student loans is to make a lot of money. If a dentist is really driven, productive, patients say yes to them, they’re ready to take responsibility, then they can do just that. To start your own practice you’ll need roughly $500,000. This is the daunting part but if you don’t make a couple of bad decisions right out of school then you can set yourself up

Read More »
Boulder Colorado investment advisor and certified financial planners
Kevin Taylor

The Anatomy of a Bank Run: Unveiling the Mechanics Behind Financial Panic

In the realm of finance, few events are as unsettling as a bank run. The mere mention of this term sends shivers down the spines of economists and bankers alike. A bank run is a phenomenon characterized by a sudden and widespread withdrawal of deposits from a financial institution, driven by a loss of confidence in its stability. This blog post aims to dissect the anatomy of a bank run, shedding light on its causes, consequences, and potential remedies. The Spark: A bank run often begins with a spark—an event that triggers fear and prompts depositors to question the safety of their funds. This spark can take various forms, such as rumors of insolvency, high-profile fraud cases, economic downturns, or a series of bank failures. Whatever the cause, it creates an atmosphere of doubt that undermines trust in the banking system. In runs in the past, the spark could have taken weeks, a slow-moving sentiment gaining some critical mass – but as the recent “runs” shows us, the entire cycle especially eh spark can happen far more quickly. Fear and Panic: Once the spark ignites, fear spreads like wildfire among depositors. Worried about losing their hard-earned money, individuals rush to the bank to withdraw their funds. The first few depositors may have genuine concerns, but their actions set off a domino effect as others join the queue, driven by the fear of being left empty-handed. Some amount of fear and panic is normal, but the runs on banks are actually self-fulfilling the fear causes the failure. Liquidity Crunch: A sudden influx of withdrawal requests places immense strain on the bank’s liquidity. Banks operate on the principle of fractional reserve banking, which means they only keep a fraction of depositors’ funds in reserve while lending out the rest. When too many depositors demand their money simultaneously, the bank struggles to meet the demand, leading to a liquidity crunch. Contagion Effect: Bank runs rarely remain confined to a single institution. As news of a bank run spreads, it instills a sense of panic in depositors of other banks as well. People start questioning the stability of other financial institutions, even if there is no concrete evidence to support their concerns. This contagion effect can quickly escalate the crisis and trigger a systemic risk to the entire banking sector. Destructive Feedback Loop: Bank runs create a destructive feedback loop. As depositors withdraw their funds, the bank’s ability to meet their demands diminishes further. This, in turn, erodes public confidence, leading to more withdrawals. The cycle continues until the bank’s reserves are depleted, and it becomes insolvent, potentially resulting in its collapse. Economic Consequences: The consequences of a bank run extend beyond the affected institution. They can have severe ramifications for the broader economy. When banks face a liquidity crunch, they curtail lending activities, causing a credit crunch. This, in turn, stifles economic growth, as individuals and businesses find it increasingly difficult to access funds for investment or day-to-day operations. Government Intervention: To mitigate the fallout of a bank run, governments often step in to restore confidence and stabilize the financial system. They may employ various measures, such as guaranteeing deposits, injecting liquidity into banks, or even bailing out troubled institutions. Government intervention aims to restore trust, prevent further runs, and minimize the potential systemic risks. A bank run is a powerful manifestation of the fragility inherent in the banking system. It demonstrates the critical role trust plays in maintaining the stability of financial institutions. Understanding the anatomy of a bank run equips us with the knowledge to identify early warning signs, implement effective regulatory measures, and establish robust safeguards to prevent such crises in the future. By nurturing trust and confidence in the banking system, we can help maintain a strong and resilient financial foundation for economies worldwide.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest