InSight

The Anatomy of a Bank Run: Unveiling the Mechanics Behind Financial Panic

Financial Planning Dentist

In the realm of finance, few events are as unsettling as a bank run. The mere mention of this term sends shivers down the spines of economists and bankers alike. A bank run is a phenomenon characterized by a sudden and widespread withdrawal of deposits from a financial institution, driven by a loss of confidence in its stability. This blog post aims to dissect the anatomy of a bank run, shedding light on its causes, consequences, and potential remedies.

The Spark: A bank run often begins with a spark—an event that triggers fear and prompts depositors to question the safety of their funds. This spark can take various forms, such as rumors of insolvency, high-profile fraud cases, economic downturns, or a series of bank failures. Whatever the cause, it creates an atmosphere of doubt that undermines trust in the banking system. In runs in the past, the spark could have taken weeks, a slow-moving sentiment gaining some critical mass – but as the recent “runs” shows us, the entire cycle especially eh spark can happen far more quickly. 

Boulder Colorado investment advisor and certified financial planners

Fear and Panic: Once the spark ignites, fear spreads like wildfire among depositors. Worried about losing their hard-earned money, individuals rush to the bank to withdraw their funds. The first few depositors may have genuine concerns, but their actions set off a domino effect as others join the queue, driven by the fear of being left empty-handed. Some amount of fear and panic is normal, but the runs on banks are actually self-fulfilling the fear causes the failure.

Liquidity Crunch: A sudden influx of withdrawal requests places immense strain on the bank’s liquidity. Banks operate on the principle of fractional reserve banking, which means they only keep a fraction of depositors’ funds in reserve while lending out the rest. When too many depositors demand their money simultaneously, the bank struggles to meet the demand, leading to a liquidity crunch.

Boulder Colorado investment advisor and certified financial planners

Contagion Effect: Bank runs rarely remain confined to a single institution. As news of a bank run spreads, it instills a sense of panic in depositors of other banks as well. People start questioning the stability of other financial institutions, even if there is no concrete evidence to support their concerns. This contagion effect can quickly escalate the crisis and trigger a systemic risk to the entire banking sector.

Destructive Feedback Loop: Bank runs create a destructive feedback loop. As depositors withdraw their funds, the bank’s ability to meet their demands diminishes further. This, in turn, erodes public confidence, leading to more withdrawals. The cycle continues until the bank’s reserves are depleted, and it becomes insolvent, potentially resulting in its collapse.

Economic Consequences: The consequences of a bank run extend beyond the affected institution. They can have severe ramifications for the broader economy. When banks face a liquidity crunch, they curtail lending activities, causing a credit crunch. This, in turn, stifles economic growth, as individuals and businesses find it increasingly difficult to access funds for investment or day-to-day operations.

Boulder Colorado investment advisor and certified financial planners

Government Intervention: To mitigate the fallout of a bank run, governments often step in to restore confidence and stabilize the financial system. They may employ various measures, such as guaranteeing deposits, injecting liquidity into banks, or even bailing out troubled institutions. Government intervention aims to restore trust, prevent further runs, and minimize the potential systemic risks.

A bank run is a powerful manifestation of the fragility inherent in the banking system. It demonstrates the critical role trust plays in maintaining the stability of financial institutions. Understanding the anatomy of a bank run equips us with the knowledge to identify early warning signs, implement effective regulatory measures, and establish robust safeguards to prevent such crises in the future. By nurturing trust and confidence in the banking system, we can help maintain a strong and resilient financial foundation for economies worldwide.

 

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

Tax Mitigation Playbook: Who manages the 1031 Exchange Process?

Since 1991, IRC § 1031 has required the use of an impartial third party to hold the proceeds from the Relinquished Property sale until the close on the Replacement Property. This third party is known as a qualified intermediary. Not only does the qualified intermediary hold the funds during the exchange period, but they also help structure the exchange, prepare the exchange documentation, and continuously monitor and guide the taxpayer to ensure compliance of the exchange in accordance with Section 1031 at both the state and federal level. While there are no federal regulations governing qualified intermediaries, with the help of the Federation of Exchange Accommodators (FEA), many states started state-level requirements to uphold high professional standards for qualified intermediaries conducting exchanges in their states. The requirements can vary from state to state, but typically include some or all of the following: Minimum bond and insurance requirements Registration and licensing requirements Investment limitations on exchange funds Qualified escrow and/or trust accounts for exchanger funds Fund withdrawal authorization requirements The foundation of all successful 1031 exchanges is laid by the qualified intermediary. Do your due diligence in researching qualified intermediaries to ensure you are not only getting the best service possible but to ensure your deferred capital gains tax will hold up above IRS review. The Complete Playbook

Read More »

Basic knowledge of stocks?

Unfortunately stocks aren’t basic, and they are the single most important and predictable way to expand your net worth. So here is our take: We are fundamental investors, we believe that to determine the value of something you have to look almost exclusively at a company’s balance sheet and related economic factors. This can be a long and detailed process, and without a passion for this type of due diligence many will see their interest wane. But it’s important to remember that owning a stock is simply owning the upside of a company’s aggregate success. So instead of falling in love with a company’s story, believe me there are many to admire, we look at a company’s or industry’s financial health (if we like the story all the better). But, if I’m going to do a quick inquiry into a companies health, this is where I start: Is the company making a profit? This is cash flow, at the end of the day this is the most important. Revenue – CoGS = Profit/Loss. I want to know about this first. If the company is profitable at what rate, this is the P/E ratio. If the company is not yet profitable, what does the timeline look like to get there? This is more speculative and can cause us concern as investors. Is the revenue increasing? A fantastic leading indicator for a company’s success. Profitable or not, a company seeing the topline number on the grow quarter over quarter can answer a lot of other questions like “how will it get to profitability?” “when will it pay down debt?” “can it pay a dividend or increase its current dividend?”. This is how companies tell us their potential.   What does the company have for cash on hand? Cash on hand tells us two things. 1) how good are they at creating cash from operations and what is their intrinsic value (see above for cash flow). And 2) how much can the company expand options, either by reinvestment or acquisition and what multiple can we give that. The amount of cash a company has on hand is a vital sign that lets investors know if the company can grow further, and with the help of answering the below “How does a company behave?” What is the company going to do with that cash?  Can the company service its debts? A good company can bury itself in debt. As quickly and easily as a person can. If you consider debt as a company borrowing from its future profits, then if your participation in its upside is impacted by money it borrows. So knowing the rate it pays on its debt, and the amount of its income it sends out the door in debt is important. It is important to remember that not all debt is created equal, debt to buy a new factory or a competitor could be expensive to a company’s revenue and ultimately profit lines. Debt to service current operations, and debt to service dividends are troublesome for an investor. Tracking the reason a company accrues debt takes time.  What do its nearest competitors look like in the above? Picking any single company is the equivalent to NOT picking hundreds of others, wouldn’t you want to know what the others are doing? I do. For this it’s important to know what universal ratios we can expect from company to company. Knowing the ratios like P/E, Debt ratio and PEG, and the range the travel helps to know quickly how a company stacks up to rest of the companies that exist. Tracking the trajectory of a company’s debt and income quarter over quarter is time consuming. But knowing that a company’s debt ratio is below the average is a quick way to qualify and disqualify a company.  How does a company behave? This is difficult to quantify and even harder to predict, which is why banks have high paid analysts that travel to shareholder meetings, speaking events, and charity gatherings just to get a feel for the intentions of the board of directors. Without the resources they commit to stalk the decision makers at a company we are left to read and interpret their reports. This is admittedly a commitment to their Information Bias, but between analysts and headlines and a consummate tracking of their history we can get a feel for how a company habitually manages its cash hoard. We can characterize a company as “growing”, “acquiring”, “dividend raising,” which is helpful when assessing its potential. This, while part of fundamental analysis, is far more art than science.  The whole process gets harder for casual investors when they are doing research into a companies alternatives, tracking investments they don’t have a stake in is usually skipped but an essential part of being objective. Most investors want the upside to an investment, and not the work, pretty simple. This is why the most successful investors outsource the due diligence, and management of their investments. It’s far easier for private and public managers of money to evaluate long run predictive habits of investment managers or passive strategies then it is to constantly monitor the universe of investment options.

Read More »

Investment Bias: Loss Aversion

Loss aversion is the tendency for people to strongly prefer avoiding losses at the detriment to obtaining gains. This puts an unnecessary fear on an investment not supported by the risk prima. This might be one of the most common biases that hinders the success of a retail investor. Simply put, investors refuse to sell loss-making investment with the hope of making their money back. A fear of making the loss “permanent” and along the way missing other opportunities, and likely impairing their returns. The fear of losing, causes more losing. It is reminiscent of the gambler who goes back to the same table to get “back on top.”  Traders are reluctant to abandon a loss maker for a fidelity to risk that they are not being rewarded for. What is important to remember, is that these stocks don’t know we own them, and there is no reason a stock cannot be rebought if/when conditions improve. Likewise, it’s important to note that the money doesn’t need to be gained, the same way it was lost. This tunnel vision on a stock or industry is another by product of loss aversion.    The loss-aversion tendency breaks one of the cardinal rules of economics; the measurement of opportunity cost. It breaks the second rule by letting emotion drive the decision. To be a successful investor you must be able to properly measure the opportunity cost available. Similar to anchoring, Loss aversion is being attached and inflexible to a previous value or cost and stems from a human tendency to avoid losses. Investors who become anchored due to loss aversion will pass on mouth-watering investment opportunities to retain an existing loss-making investment in the hope of recouping their losses. It is hard to determine when a cost is “sunk” if the purchase price is always contaminating the rational. Instead investors should resort to the valuation metrics that have likely deteriorated in the stock, and evaluate that to the opportunities they are missing by caring their overweighed fidelity to a position.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest