InSight

USA’s Credit Rating Downgraded – What it Means for the Economy and Lessons from the Past

Financial Planning Dentist

USA’s Credit Rating Downgraded – What it Means for the Economy and Lessons from the Past

  • The U.S. has had its 2nd downgrade in 12 years
  • Equity and debt markets and the broader economy are highly correlated to the strength of U.S. Creditworthiness
  • Politics and Debt Debates are wearing on credit agencies’ willingness to underwrite poor behavior and political infighting

In a surprising turn of events, the credit rating of the United States has been downgraded to AA+ from AAA, a rating the U.S. has held at Fitch since 1994, signaling a potential cause for concern in the country’s financial stability. The downgrade comes as a result of several key factors that have raised worries among investors and financial experts.

  1. Expected Fiscal Deterioration: The downgrade reflects concerns about the future financial situation of the US over the next three years. Experts fear that the government’s ability to manage its finances may deteriorate, potentially leading to a higher risk of defaulting on its debt.
  2. Growing Debt Burden: Another significant issue is the increasing debt burden that the US has been facing. The government has been accumulating more debt, which raises questions about its ability to repay the money it has borrowed.
  3. Erosion of Governance: Over the past two decades, there has been a steady decline in the quality of governance in the US. This is evident in the way the government has repeatedly struggled to reach agreements on the debt limit, leading to last-minute resolutions. Such instability erodes confidence in the government’s fiscal management.

The consequences of this downgrade could be far-reaching, impacting various aspects of the economy. One potential concern is that it might lead to a lack of confidence in US bonds, which are essential for the government to borrow money. If investors become skeptical about the government’s ability to pay back its debts, they may demand higher interest rates on US bonds, making it costlier for the government to borrow money.

The US government’s deficit, which is the amount by which government spending exceeds its income, is expected to increase. In 2023, it is predicted to reach 6.3% of the country’s total economic output (GDP), which is quite high compared to previous years. By 2025, it might even widen further to 6.9% of GDP.

Moreover, the level of debt compared to the size of the economy is projected to rise over the forecast period, reaching 118.4% of GDP by 2025. This level of debt is significantly higher than what is considered safe for countries with strong financial standings.

One potential consequence of the downgrade is the risk of a mild recession in the US economy. Tighter credit conditions, weakening business investment, and slower consumption could lead to economic growth slowing down. This, in turn, may impact job opportunities and the overall well-being of the population.

To address these issues, the US Federal Reserve has been raising interest rates. While this can help control inflation, it may also make borrowing money more expensive for businesses and consumers. The Federal Reserve faces the challenge of balancing economic growth with the need to manage inflation.

It is important for the US government to take swift and effective action to address these financial challenges. Failure to do so could lead to more difficulties in the future and potentially impact the financial stability of the nation.

Despite the downgrade, the US still possesses some strengths that support its financial standing. Its large, advanced, and diversified economy, coupled with the US dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency, provides the government with exceptional financing flexibility.

In August 2011, a similar event occurred when Standard & Poor’s (S&P) downgraded the credit rating of the United States from AAA to AA+. This had significant effects on financial markets and the overall economy:

Market Turmoil: The downgrade triggered widespread market turmoil. Stock markets experienced sharp declines, and investors panicked as they worried about the stability of the US economy and its ability to repay its debts.

Increased Volatility: Financial markets became more volatile in the wake of the downgrade. Investors became uncertain about the future, leading to wild swings in asset prices and increased risk aversion.

Higher Borrowing Costs: The downgrade led to increased borrowing costs for the US government. As investors perceived the risk of holding US government debt to be higher, they demanded higher yields on US Treasury bonds. This, in turn, increased the interest payments that the government had to make on its debt, putting additional strain on the budget.

Impact on Consumer Confidence: The downgrade had a negative impact on consumer confidence. When people see negative news about the economy, they become more cautious about their spending and saving habits, potentially leading to decreased consumer spending, which is a significant driver of economic growth.

Weakened Dollar: The US dollar, which had long been considered a safe-haven currency, faced pressure due to the downgrade. As investors sought safer alternatives, the value of the dollar depreciated against other currencies.

Impact on Global Markets: The downgrade had ripple effects on global financial markets. Many countries and institutions around the world hold US Treasury bonds as part of their investment portfolios, and the downgrade caused concern about the stability of these holdings.

Political Fallout: The downgrade also led to political fallout within the US. It intensified debates and disagreements among policymakers about how to address the country’s fiscal challenges and reduce its debt burden.

It’s worth noting that while the 2011 downgrade had significant short-term effects on financial markets, the US economy eventually recovered. However, it serves as a reminder of the importance of fiscal responsibility and prudent financial management to maintain investor confidence and economic stability.

Addressing the challenges posed by the downgrade requires swift and effective action by the US government. Measures to control debt, improve governance, and foster sustainable economic growth are essential to restore investor confidence.

Despite the downgrade, the US still possesses strengths, including a large and advanced economy, and the status of the US dollar as the world’s primary reserve currency. These factors provide the government with flexibility in managing its finances.

The recent downgrade serves as a wake-up call for policymakers to take necessary steps to ensure fiscal responsibility and stability. By learning from the past and addressing financial challenges effectively, the US can strengthen its economic standing and instill confidence in its future.

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

Pros, Cons, and Risks in a Delaware Statutory Trusts (DST)

Delaware Statutory Trust Pros: As an income source: DSTs are popular with people in general who wish to develop some diversity in their investment portfolio by introducing some real estate components. People like being able to count on the specific return and appreciate not having to deal directly with tenants. They are also extremely popular with 1031 exchange investors for the same reasons but also due to the fact that it can be difficult to identify replacement property within 45 days of the sale of their relinquished property and they have certainty of closing within the applicable 180-day window. As a source for replacement debt (for 1031’s): Most investors participating in a 1031 Exchange require the new investors to have a prorated portion of the debt to be able to replace the portion lost when relinquishing the property. The debt is non-recourse to the investor but allows the investor to hold new debt equal to or greater than the debt retired upon the sale of the relinquished property. A DST can make being assigned this debt an easy prospect. The transfer of the relinquished property to the Qualified Intermediary and the receipt of the replacement property from the Qualified Intermediary is considered an exchange. To be compliant with IRC Section 1031, the transaction must be structured appropriately, rather than being a sale to one party followed by a purchase from another party. As a backup plan (for 1031’s): Exchange investors also sometimes use a DST as a backup in case the primary identified property falls through or the primary property acquisition does utilize the entire exchange value. The DST purchase can absorb the balance. Delaware Statutory Trust Cons: Like any real estate investment, DSTs have traditional risks associated with them. Real estate risk, operator risk, interest rate risk, and liquidity risk are all common risks associated with the DST investments. The sponsor does due diligence as does the back office of the broker or adviser’s firm, but so should the investor. Asymmetrical Risk: The prospectus typically does a good job of pointing out other risks of each such individual investment. But the location of the investment, the building type and local market, and the quality of the sponsor are all important non-idiosyncratic risks investors should be familiar with in DST investing. Real Estate Risk While it is regulated and sold as a security, at its core, DSTs are real estate, and the risks of any real estate investment apply. Real estate risk in this context is exactly equivalent to the real estate you presently own, including your own home. The local market can drop, the economy can decline, or weather and catastrophe can befall an investment. All of these events will affect the condition, income and expense, and eventual sales price of the property. This is not a risk that is without mitigation. This risk can be diversified by selecting a portfolio of real estate with different building types, locations, and management expertise that understand how to best insure and stagger certain forms of risk. Ensuring you have a well-diversified portfolio in growing markets is one way to mitigate real estate risk. And investors shouldn’t underestimate the importance of spending sufficient time at the outset to ensure the property is a good investment and that it fits well into their InSight-Full® financial plan. Operator Risk A risk unique to DST investors is operator risk. Poor management in all real estate lowers both the income performance and the long-term capital return. When the property is not managed at an optimal level, return is always affected. Both a Property Manager and an Asset Manager manage DSTs, and each is assigned to different roles. A quick review of how management duties are divided: the Property Manager’s job is to implement the business plan, increase income, and lower expenses. As a result, net operating income will increase over time. The Asset Manager watches the property as if he owned it himself, managing the Property Manager with the same goal of increasing net operating income as much as possible, which increases your cash flow and appreciation potential. The Asset Manager also watches the market for sales opportunities and decides when it’s time to sell, reports to investors periodically, and is responsible for keeping the investors abreast of what’s going on with the property and answering any questions. Liquidity Risk: Most Real estate investors have long-term views of their holdings. However, DSTs are somewhat illiquid once acquired and may carry liquidation penalties to accommodate an early exit. So all investors should be prepared to stay invested for the term of the deal and have a long-term disposition if the DST is part of a multicycle tax mitigation scheme. Managing liquidity might be the most important way to manage your exposure to real estate. Having a good idea of our expectations on liquidity can help manage other forms of risk in real estate. For example, investors in the early stages of a bear market who can “wait out” market conditions by lowering their liquidity requirements might find they can outlast negative consequences from other forms of risk. Static Debt: One challenge of a DST structure is that the property cannot be refinanced after the initial loan is in place nor can a lease be revised for a single tenant property. These factors are usually dealt with before the DST formation but sometimes the issues may arise later. If so, solutions can be complicated and expansive. Most sponsors will not change the debt structure of a deal once it is closed. Tax Status and changes to Taxation: As your income and taxation change in life, so too might the success and valuation of your tax mitigation strategy. It’s important to evaluate your long-term goals and expectations and work with a CFP® to make sure the tax scheme makes sense over a range of scenarios. According to the IRS and Revenue Ruling 2004-86, 1031 exchanges that use a DST are structured investments. This revenue procedure includes guidelines for

Read More »

Where to start?

Take a step. Big changes especially long term changes to things like health and finance take time. Don’t make sweeping changes to start, take one step, in the right direction and build off that.  Don’t build a budget immediately because that will most likely lead to a negative experience and most people’s experience with money is already negative. So instead start to save and have those savings go into an investment account that does everything for you to start. If you find that you want to dedicate some more time to it then do it, but first just make it really easy on yourself. What you’ll find over time your account is growing a lot more than your bank account.  Quick tip: Don’t begin reading investment articles or start watching the news to hear market updates, and don’t log into the account frequently because you’ll most likely let emotion get in the way of your new plan. So, find out how much you can save with your income (read our Common Questions section for best practices). Then take that dollar amount and divide it by 12 to figure out how much you need to save monthly. If you get paid bi-weekly divide your annual savings amount by 24 and automate your savings. Log into your payroll provider with your employer and automate that amount to go directly to an investment account.  For more information and resources check out our Education Library!

Read More »
Colorado real estate investment professionals, real estate planning, commercial real estate investments
Articles
Kevin Taylor

What to know about investments in industrial buildings

Investing in industrial properties, such as warehouses and manufacturing facilities, can be a lucrative opportunity for investors. However, like any investment, it comes with its share of benefits and drawbacks. Benefits of Industrial Investments: High cash flow potential: Industrial properties often have long-term tenants and can generate high rental income, providing a reliable cash flow for investors. Lower operating costs: Industrial properties typically have lower maintenance costs and fewer tenant turnover expenses compared to other types of commercial real estate. Increasing demand: The growth of e-commerce and logistics industries has increased the demand for industrial properties, making them a valuable investment. Diversification: Investing in industrial properties can provide diversification to an investment portfolio. Drawbacks of Industrial Investments: Location: Industrial properties are often located in less desirable areas, which can affect their value and potential for rental income. Tenant risk: Industrial tenants may have specialized requirements and may be more difficult to replace if they vacate the property. Environmental issues: Industrial properties may have environmental risks or liabilities associated with them, which can impact the property value and require costly remediation. Limited tenant base: The tenant pool for industrial properties may be limited to a specific industry or type of business. The most exciting benefit of investing in industrial properties is the high cash flow potential and increasing demand. The cap rate, or the ratio of net operating income to property value, should be evaluated to ensure a good return on investment. Generally, a higher cap rate indicates a better return on investment, but this can vary depending on the location and condition of the property. There is a moderate level of risk involved in investing in industrial properties. Location, tenant risk, environmental issues, and limited tenant base are all factors that can impact the value and potential for rental income. People typically invest in a variety of industrial properties, including warehouses, distribution centers, manufacturing facilities, and storage units. The specific type of industrial property depends on the investor’s goals and market conditions. In conclusion, investing in industrial properties can offer high cash flow potential and diversification to an investment portfolio. However, careful evaluation of the property and market conditions is necessary to minimize risk and maximize returns.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest