InSight

Financial Planning Dentist

InSight
Finacial
Planners

Menu

Market InSights:

When does a Bear look like a Bull? (Pt. 2)

When will a Bear-Market Rally form a New Bull?

The market will turn around, they always do, some would argue that they are built to expand. Below are some of the elements we look for to determine if a market is turning around, or if we are looking at another Bear Rally. 

Rallies will get longer in time, and less dramatic 

The drama of a bear market is exciting and news outlets love it. The markets and the news gravitate towards those chaotic headlines. This was easily seen when during the last Bull market news outlets ran headlines and talking heads marking the top, declaring market “warnings” and finding economists that would deride the market. It’s exciting and captures eyeballs…the turnaround won’t be all that exciting. 

There won’t be a day of major capitulation, followed by a counter move to the upside. It will come with steady, long-term grinds up. It will come with the whole market moving up in a coordinated and cooperative way. Markets with a broad influence from several sectors that grind out small moves over a long time are far more attractive to investors and generate a virtuous cycle. 

The Bear Rallies of 2022 so far…

 

Days

Percent

Daily %

Bear Rally (1)

9

6.1%

0.67%

Bear Rally (2)

11

9.9%

0.90%

Bear Rally (3)

12

6.2%

.51%

Bear Rally (4)

41

14.3%

.34%

Bear Rally (5)

?

?

?

The median gain of the largest rallies that have occurred within bear markets is 11.5% over 39 days. Typically, the rallies on the low side of the median, occur early in the bear market, while those that exist on the high side are in the more mature parts of the bear market.

Additionally, there are far more rallies below the mean, than above. Meaning that we will see more false rallies that are short and volatile and only a few long-term sustainable rallies that are long with small moves.

The longer these rallies get, and the smaller the moves, the more likely an “all clear” can be declared. 

There will be broad support  

Investment professionals look for certain technical signals to be in place before confirming a reversal is underway. There are several measuring sticks that look for broad support in trading. The advance-decline line, trades above the moving average, and the McClellanOscillator are examples of technical measurements of the breath the market is moving, for how many stocks and how many sectors are participating in the move. 

“Breadth thrust” is the term for these signals, and a leading indicator if a market is transitioning from a Bear to a Bull. The duration of the move and the price gains associated with it are also important. The indicators that most reliably confirm that there is a shift into a new bull market are:

Flows into equities and out of cash in important ETFs

There are “traders” ETFs, and there are “investors” ETFs, and knowing the difference is important.

If dollars are flowing into leveraged high volatility trading products it is a signal that the market is trading for a short-term and volatile swing (read a bear rally). If money flows are going into long-term holds that cover the whole of a market in balanced and long-term ways, it’s a signal that the investment appetite is changing to a more long-term outlook and investors are building a new core of their profile. Outsized flows into SPY, QQQ, or VOO are a good sign that the broad market is healthy and investors are willing to hold the whole of the market. 

The current market is witnessing the worst first half for stocks and bonds in 50 years, the highest inflation in 40 years, and an endless barrage of bad economic data. So seeing a broad, coordinated shift from cash and cash-like funds, into broad equity will be a good sign in a change from “risk off” to diversified “risk on”.

Earrings being “better than expected” at more and more companies

There is an entire industry reporting on “beats and misses” on companies’ earnings. While individual stock stories are exciting and reported on the news, the sizes and frequency of misses vs. beats are often overlooked. 

Wall Street pros are at odds as to whether we are at an inflection point in the markets. That inflection point will be confirmed when estimates, which are increasingly bleak, are replaced by corporate earnings that are better than expected. This will take several quarters and is a laggard indicator. But is the most reliable measurement to say the companies that make up the market are in a healthy and expansionary space. This seachange in earnings will likely happen 2-3 quarters after the market has “bottomed”, so while not a great trading and timing indicator, it is a very good indicator of changes in the macroenvironment.

Company earnings are a more reliable indicator of investment health, this is not a shocking revelation. But the frequency and diversity by which these companies manage inflation pressures, and sell their product to the marketplace is a tide that raises all boats and encourages board participation in rising stock prices. 

What past Bear-Markets tell us about future ones

A peek at the history of bear markets would suggest that the “naysayers” are on the right side of history, at least for a time. In the 30 different bear markets that have occurred since 1929, the stock market registered an average decline of 29.7%. These downturns lasted have lasted for an average of 341 days. 86% of the bear markets last less than 20 months, and few last longer than one year.  

Right now, according to traditional economic interpretations, the U.S. could well be in a recession. We have seen two-quarters of GDP contraction. The Commerce Department reported that gross domestic product shrank by 0.9% in the second quarter of, after contracting 1.6% in the first quarter of this year. That’s it, that is the traditional definition of a recession, and the Bear market has priced that move in as a result. 

So why the “is this a recession this time” talk? Well, there has been a rash of different pro-growth data that has persisted. Wages have grown, unemployment has stayed low, and demand for freight, semiconductors, and component raw materials has been high. These would indicate that demand is still healthy. How can you have a recession with such a demand for materials? 

If the Fed can achieve the delicate balance of taming inflation by slowing the economy without tipping the country into a recession, this bear market could already be long in the tooth. If we count the correction from the November high, we will be entering the second year of the bear market next month. The one-year mark for this Bear market would come in March of 2023 (just around the corner by economic standards – meaning we are currently in the 3rd or 4th inning of the Bear Market with the most violent changes in pricing behind us. This would be an “un-recessionary bear market”

If the Fed fails in a “soft landing” in the first quarter of next year more reliable indicators of recession (falling commodity prices, major spikes in unemployment, and weakening manufacturing outlooks) are on the rise before the Fed quells inflation then we can see a more elongated bear market and a full-blown recession. 

Continued from Part 1: When does a Bear look like a Bull? What to Avoid

More related articles:

Boulder Financial Advisors, Planning and Zending
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Interested in achieving wealth? Psychology may be a better starting place…

This blog post explores the intriguing relationship between mental well-being and economic prosperity. We delve into the world of economics and psychology to investigate whether therapy, aspirational videos, and antidepressants can pave the way to financial success. In our quest for prosperity, we often focus on tangible solutions such as infrastructure development and economic policies. However, an intriguing and emerging field of economic research is shedding light on the profound impact of psychological interventions on wealth accumulation. In this blog post, we delve into the fascinating intersection of economics and mental well-being, exploring the question: Can therapy, aspirational videos, and even antidepressants pave the way to financial success? In impoverished nations grappling with the aftermath of war, violence, food scarcity, or natural disasters, trauma is pervasive. Psychological interventions hold promise as modest tools for economic self-improvement. For instance, a study in Ethiopia examined the psychological effects of elevating aspirations. Researchers conducted a randomized control trial, screening short films depicting business and entrepreneurial success within the community to one group. Six months later, those who had watched the films had exhibited more work, savings, and investments in education compared to the control group. Even five years down the line, households exposed to the films had accumulated more wealth, and their children had received an additional 0.43 years of education, which is considered quite remarkable. A similar impact was observed in Mexico, where an aspirational video shown to female microenterprise owners resulted in improved business performance through a randomized control trial. Intensive versions of such treatments are likely to be effective. Certain cultures, like the overseas Chinese and Lebanese communities, have traditionally displayed strong entrepreneurial tendencies, benefiting from a steady diet of cultural influences, including parental guidance, peer pressure, aspirational media, music, and television. The question is not whether cultural conditioning works—it does—but rather how effective a smaller, more targeted dose can be. However, some psychological interventions yield only temporary effects. For example, a study in India taught self-efficacy lessons to women, leading to a 32% short-term increase in employment likelihood, but the effects faded within a year. When it comes to psychotherapy, prominent in much of the Western world, evaluating its impact is challenging due to cost and regulatory constraints that hinder randomized control trials. Nevertheless, there are encouraging findings. A survey across lower- and middle-income countries identified 39 studies demonstrating that psychotherapeutic treatments could enhance work-related outcomes, including employment, through randomized control trials. Treating schizophrenia seems to have a particularly significant effect. In Pakistan, mental health treatments for perinatally depressed mothers yielded substantial benefits for their children. In Niger, both psychosocial treatments and cash transfers improved outcomes for recipients, although in Kenya, cash transfers proved cheaper and more effective, though psychotherapeutic treatments did yield some gains. As for antidepressants, economists are only beginning to gather evidence. One study in India found that combining antidepressants with therapy and livelihood assistance had significant positive effects for treated women. Lower depression rates resulted in increased investment in their children and reduced negative life events. While none of these findings conclusively establish a “psychology of poverty” to be addressed through external interventions, they do suggest that less affluent economies can make incremental gains by investing in what we might call psychological and psychotherapeutic infrastructure. These research designs can be applied to hundreds or thousands of people, though implementing them on a nationwide scale remains challenging. Nevertheless, countries can strive to make therapeutic help more accessible and affordable while fostering a culture where seeking help is encouraged. Culture plays a crucial role in economic development, and these small-scale cultural interventions can have a marginal impact. What about the United States, with its abundance of psychotherapeutic ideas, aspirational videos, and antidepressants? It’s hard to say. While the research is in its early stages, it may not be too soon to suggest that, from an economic perspective at least, embracing psychological and pharmaceutical interventions more openly could be better than the alternative.

Read More »
January 6, 2024 No Comments
Boulder Colorado Debt Investments
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Hidden Hazards of Mezzanine Debt: What You Need to Know

Mezzanine debt refers to a type of financing that lies between traditional senior debt (such as bank loans) and equity in the capital structure of a company. It represents a form of subordinated debt that combines features of both debt and equity instruments. Mezzanine debt holders have a higher risk tolerance compared to senior debt holders but typically receive a higher potential return. In the world of finance, mezzanine debt has gained popularity as an alternative investment option. It offers attractive returns to investors seeking higher yields than traditional fixed-income instruments. However, behind the allure of potential profits lie dangers and risks that demand careful consideration. In this blog post, we will shed light on the hidden hazards associated with buying mezzanine debt, allowing you to make informed decisions. Subordinate Position: Mezzanine debt typically holds a subordinate position in the capital structure of a company. This means that in the event of default or bankruptcy, mezzanine debt holders will be paid off after senior debt holders, leaving them exposed to greater risk. If the underlying company faces financial distress, the recovery prospects for mezzanine debt holders may be significantly diminished, leading to potential losses. Complexity and Lack of Transparency: Mezzanine debt investments can be complex and challenging to assess. Unlike publicly traded securities, mezzanine debt often lacks the transparency and oversight that comes with regulated markets. Investors may face difficulties in accurately evaluating the underlying assets, cash flows, and risks associated with these investments. Without proper due diligence, it becomes challenging to gauge the true value and sustainability of the investment. Interest Rate and Payment Structure: Mezzanine debt often carries a higher interest rate than traditional debt instruments, compensating investors for the additional risk they assume. However, the interest payments on mezzanine debt are often structured as “payment in kind” (PIK) or deferred payments. PIK interest accrues and is paid at a later date or upon maturity, leading to potential cash flow challenges for investors who rely on a regular income. Market Dependency and Liquidity Risk: Mezzanine debt is typically illiquid and lacks an active secondary market. Unlike publicly traded stocks or bonds, it can be difficult to find buyers or exit a mezzanine debt investment before maturity. This illiquidity exposes investors to significant liquidity risk, tying up their capital for extended periods. It can become problematic if the investor needs to access funds or respond to changing market conditions quickly. Business Performance and Default Risk: Investing in mezzanine debt inherently ties the investor’s fortunes to the performance and success of the underlying company. If the company’s financial health deteriorates or experiences operational challenges, the risk of default on the debt increases. Factors such as market conditions, industry disruptions, or poor management decisions can significantly impact the repayment ability of the company, thus jeopardizing the investment. Lack of Collateral and Security: Unlike senior debt holders, mezzanine debt investors often have limited or no access to collateral or security. In case of default, senior debt holders have a higher claim to the company’s assets, leaving mezzanine debt investors with diminished recovery prospects. This lack of collateral increases the risk exposure for mezzanine debt holders, as their recovery relies solely on the success and ability of the company to generate sufficient cash flows. While mezzanine debt investments offer the potential for attractive returns, it is essential to understand the associated risks and hazards. Subordinate position, complexity, lack of transparency, interest payment structures, liquidity risk, business performance, and lack of collateral all contribute to the dangers involved in buying mezzanine debt. As an investor, thorough due diligence, risk assessment, and a well-diversified portfolio are crucial when considering this alternative investment option. It is advisable to consult with experienced financial professionals who can provide guidance tailored to your specific circumstances.  

Read More »
August 16, 2022 No Comments

Pin It on Pinterest