InSight

Financial Planning Dentist

InSight
Finacial
Planners

Menu

Market InSights:

When does a Bear look like a Bull? (Pt. 1)

Four things to avoid and four things to embrace when the Bear turns into a Bull.

 

A Bear Rally is a short, swift, updraft in stocks that can end as quickly as it began. Here are the four signals to avoid.

Markets will routinely go through bouts of extreme buying during a bear market. There are several fundamental and technical reasons why markets “rally” at these times amid broader weakness in the market. The market this time has just come off its 4th bear market rally of the 2022 selloff.

Boulder Colorado Investment Management
All Four Bear Rallies

These “false” turnarounds can be frustrating to the casual observer. A feeling that the market is random and chaotic can lead people to become frustrated during these moments of euphoria, only to be quickly rebuffed by another violent selloff.

At some point, these turnarounds stay intact and the Bear market rally is seen for what it is, the beginning of the next bull.

Here are some of the important topics to keep in mind to determine if we are looking at a new Bull, or another Bear.

Markets are Money with Emotion – Bear Rally (4)

If markets were perfectly logical they would be rather dull. If smart people reached the same conclusion regarding the future value of dollars (inflation), corporate revenue (earnings), and cost of capital (debt) then the auction that is the market would see a very narrow band of trading. But, it’s not, there is a maelstrom of emotion that accompanies markets and this market is no exception.

Boulder Colorado Investment Advisor
Bear Market Rally Four

The rally from the June lows, to the most recent selloff, started at the Fed meeting in June and ended in mid-August (Bear Rally 4). The “Dovish Pivot” was the culprit – the belief that a small part of Jerome Powell’s update in June was dovish, and the “feeling” that the rate hiking cycle would come to an end sooner. This was both a fundamental shift in markets and an emotional one. One that we at InSight, didn’t share. We either didn’t hear this new dovishness, or we didn’t believe in it. 

This Bear rally was an abrupt reversal of the trend based on emotion, which you might assume is not a reliable and lasting reason for markets to change course, and you would be right. These good times were quickly brought to an end with more commentary from fed chairs and economists in August and were fully doused by Powell’s speech on September, 21st.

Trading markets on emotions is hard, and for that, we look for momentum to confirm our emotions and use the MACD reading to understand when emotional buying has turned into momentum buying. We try not to fight the momentum in markets.

The “Narrow” rally – Bear Rally (2)

When markets turn around, it happens quickly, and no one wants to “miss out” on the bottom. This causes abrupt buying at symbolic (not fundamental) levels or in single stocks or sectors. Some stocks serve as a bellwether for markets, Trains, Chips, and Logistics companies can tell us when the market is healthy and the supply chain orderly. But when one group of stocks march higher alone, it is likely a false rally and they will routinely be brought back with the border market.

The US Technology Index registered a bear market on March 14 when it closed down 19.8% from its peak on Nov. 22. The index then zipped higher, gaining 17.3% as of March 29 before resuming its downward trend. The index lost 27% between its March 29 close and its June 16 low.

boulder financial planning experts expert portfolio management
Bear Market Rally Two

There was a “buy the dip rally” in a Bull Market for well over a decade. So, traders and investors have been conditioned to buy up markets trading on lows. Markets registering short-term (1 and 3 month lows) have been quickly reversed since the financial crisis.

The great financial crisis ushered in an era of seemingly unlimited accommodation from the Fed and every dip was met with more and more liquidity from investors and the government. Operating in unison, the market drawdowns were short, and bull rallies were profitable.

The Bear Rally (2) of this cycle was met with no such injection from the Fed and the rally petered out when traders ran out of money. This reversal was confirmed as the market headed lower from Bear End (2) into Bear Start (3). A lack of dry powder meant there was less capacity to continue buying up the market. 

There was no confirmation in the rest of the market, and it was proof that while technology is the most important sector in the SP500, it alone cannot fix weaknesses in other market sectors.

Oversold conditions cause “snapbacks” – Bear Rally (1)

Beware of Oversold conditions that cause bear-market rallies. This is also known as a bear trap, a sucker’s rally, or a “dead cat bounce.” Frequently bottoms are found when conditions on the Relative Strength Index (RSI) reads “oversold” so traders and investors misinterpret these as bottoms, especially early in a bear market. The Bear Rally (1) is a good example of this:

Boulder Colorado Investment Management
Bear Market Rally One

A phenomenon in bear market rallies is the snapback or dead-back bounce. When stock prices deteriorate so quickly, the oversold conditions are met, and the traders look to profit off the short-lived really to come. Oversold conditions are routinely bought up quickly – but they are quickly reversed when the longer trend catches up with the short-term trend. Oversold, or overbought conditions are usually reached when a chart favors the bias of a daily trend over a weekly trend. 

Rallies based on “oversold” conditions very rarely last longer than a couple of weeks. 6-15 trading days at the most, before the more powerful long-term trend, exerts its pressure over the short term.

Continued in Part 2: When does a Bear look like a Bull? What to Look for

More related articles:
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Passive Tax vs Active Tax Strategy

Key InSights: Too few investors have an active tax strategy The efficiency or a potential write off should not be the reason you own or sell an investment Managing federal and state income taxes is a year-long process Taxes are a permanent erosion of wealth Using the right investment and the appropriate accounts can help keep more of your money invested Certain strategies and accounts can support the causes you care about, transfer more money to your family, all while paying less in taxes Most tax strategies require little or no investment, and even the complex long term strategies can be developed and enshrined with little costs  We work with clients and prospects who will happily spend untold hours researching stocks, bonds, and funds for the highest possible return on investment. They will bookmark and read articles about new funds, strategies, and investment opportunities. They watch investment shows, the news, and will ask friends for help and advice. In the past, we have addressed the importance of acknowledging the difference between accretive and erosive debt, and likewise, we think it’s important to discuss the difference between active and passive tax strategies.  The vast majority of investors can be serviced better by addressing the most logical source of manageable loss in a portfolio: tax efficiency. We love picking the right investments in a portfolio – but even the best funds and stocks outperform irregularly. However, a regular source of loss in a portfolio and one of the most avoidable is in the tax ecosystem investors build for themselves both inside and outside of a portfolio. This is the difference between a passive tax strategy and an active tax strategy.  Investing with tax-efficiency in mind doesn’t have to be complicated but it does take some planning. While taxes should never be the primary driver of an investment strategy, tax awareness and some tax infrastructure does have the potential to improve after-tax returns for most investors.  Passive Tax Strategy Most investors and seemingly all of the do-it-yourself investors are part of the passive tax group. These are investors who will trade in and out of stocks of funds through the year, and come February and March of the following year, will likely need to write a check (or get their refund reduced) as a result of this methodology. Taking a year-end inventory of your investments and income will likely result in a double-digit taxation loss that might otherwise have been avoidable. Additionally, several of the best and easiest ways to mitigate taxes can only be established before the taxable event has happened. Many of the passive tax strategies investors implement begin with managing a gain or loss when ideally they should begin months before so that all options can be weighed. Without knowing some of these tax-efficient strategies, investors have theoretically chosen to put blinders on and stick to their plan, or worse off, change it when it’s too late. Additionally, investors sometimes miss impactful tax law changes that tend to occur every couple of years.  The harsh reality is that this method of tax planning over 30 years costs a person with a Bachelors’s Degree level of income about $226,000 in avoidable taxation over the course of their earning years. That sum mitigated differently and invested routinely can be worth over a million dollars in retirement or passed down to an heir or charity. For many that million-dollar difference is the difference between fully supporting their investment and legacy goals and being forced to sacrifice some part of their plan.  There are several lever and investment manager can pull to try to manage federal and income taxes: selecting investment products, timing of buy and sell decisions, choosing accounts, taking advantage of realized losses, and specific strategies such as charitable giving can all be pulled together into a cohesive approach that can help you manage, defer, and reduce taxes. Of course, investment decisions should be driven primarily by your goals, financial situation, timeline, and risk tolerance. But as part of that framework, factoring in federal and state income taxes may help you build wealth faster. Active Tax Strategy Investors have a variety of levers at their disposal they can use to transform their income and or investment tax strategy: selecting investment products, the timing of buys/sells, account types, tax harvesting, and specific strategies such as charitable giving can all be pulled together into a cohesive approach that can help you manage, defer, and reduce taxes. We have addressed many of those ideas below.  But as I stated above, taxes shouldn’t be the driver for your investment decisions.  Those should be determined by your goals, financial situation, timeline, and risk tolerance. But as a complement to that framework, factoring in an active tax strategy for income and taxes may help you build wealth faster and in most cases, make you better prepared for life after work. Tax budgeting: Part of a tax and financial plan involves knowing what the acceptable range for paying taxes is as part of the long-term equation. Generating income for the most part will result in taxation. But the difference between knowing a strategy for income and an investment that will generate a 38% tax liability or a 15% liability can save investors tens of thousands of dollars in a given year.  Tax losses and loss carryforwards: Many investors are aware that a loss on the sale of security should be used to offset any realized investment gains. Fewer know that up to $3,000 in taxable losses can be used to offset ordinary income annually. In some cases, if your realized losses exceed the limits for deductions in the year they occur, the tax losses can be “carried forward” to offset future realized income. All gains and losses are “on paper” only until you sell the investment. Tax-loss harvesting: This strategy involves taking advantage of losses as part of the rebalancing process. Deliberate capturing of losses can provide tax relief when investors have positions that have unrealized gains that

Read More »
February 26, 2021 No Comments
Articles
Kevin Taylor

What Are the Benefits of a Safe Harbor 401(k) Plan?

A safe harbor 401(k) plan is a retirement savings plan that has advantages for both employers and employees. Here’s why it’s a good choice: Easy Compliance: Safe harbor plans help employers by automatically passing certain annual tests. These tests, like the ADP and ACP tests, ensure fairness in the plan and prevent favoritism toward business owners and highly paid employees. Failing these tests can be expensive, so passing them without worry is a big plus. Encouraging Savings: To meet safe harbor standards, employers need to make contributions to their employees’ accounts. This serves as an incentive for more employees to join the plan and rewards them for saving. Flexibility in Contributions: Employers have options in how they contribute. There are two plan types: traditional safe harbor plans with specific contribution formulas and immediate vesting, and QACA safe harbor plans with slightly lower matching contributions and shorter vesting schedules. Both types offer different contribution formulas, so you can tailor it to your needs. If you’re interested in setting up a safe harbor plan, contact InSight.

Read More »
November 15, 2023 No Comments
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Is a U.S. Housing Market Crash Inevitable?

It is almost inevitable that housing correction is coming. Most of the upswing nationally in housing prices is caused by low borrowing rates. A mortgage payment is mostly made up of three different columns 1) Principle 2) Interest 3) Other required costs of homeownership like insurance and taxes. The bulk of the payment comes from the first two.  Banks start the process by determining your “ability-to-repay” the debt. This comes to a given amount that they assume borrowers can repay, let’s say this number is $100 a month. This means you are approved if Principle, Interest, and Other Costs can come to less than $100 a month. So all of the “costs” combined need to stay below that mark, a zero-sum figure. Now as interest rates were low, the amount of the interest portion of the loan was low. Meaning more money could be freed up for the principal portion. And that principal portion is the rate at which the loan is being repaid. So if over a 360 payment loan $75 on average is getting paid in principle, the loan can retire $25,200 in debt. So the borrower can offer $25,200 for a home with faith from the bank that they will be able to repay. Thus, the buyer in the real estate auction can spend $25,200 max (and they will spend all of it).  Now if that same borrower, who can afford $100 a month in mortgage payments has to borrow in an interest rate environment that is 10% more costly than before, a rate change of borrowing from 2% to 2.2% the borrower will need to borrow from the principal repayment part of the pie. That means that the average payment they can afford to make comes down, and they will only be able to offer $21,600 when making an offer on the house. This is 14% less, after a 10% move up in borrowing costs.  This is where it will get interesting.  The “rates” that you may have heard are rising, are the percentages at which banks borrow. That money has cost banks 0.25%, since 2020. It’s made spending during the pandemic easier and lowered the cost of capital risk for banks in order to keep the money flowing. So, a bank borrowing at .25% or close to it can lend a 30-year mortgage at really low rates. Hence the sub 3% and 2% mortgage rates we saw in the last 2 years and on the heels of the 2009-2016 recovery cycle.   The by-product of this low-interest rate, high spending environment is inflation (the rising costs of goods and services). So if the cost to the bank to repay these loans increases, the cost for borrowers increases at a faster rate. So the rate of change is more than the 10% increase we discussed above. A borrower seeing their interest rate go from 2.2% to 4.4% (while still historically low) will see their capacity for repayment severely impacted. By just returning to normal lending rates the portion a borrower can repay is reduced. The borrower who could afford a $100 a month payment, now sees his buying power reduced to $9,000 over the course of the 360 mortgage payments in a 30-year mortgage. The borrower now has 41% of the buying capacity by doubling the borrowing rate, this change in the amount of borrowed capital buyers brought into the house buying equation, means that the bid sizes will invariably contract. Bringing the prices that a home clears the market down. Knock-on-effects: Inflation In the above scenario, the ignored part of the pie is the “Other.” This is mostly tax and insurance, but also includes power, water, HOA’s, and other required expenses for the ownership of a home. These costs are also climbing, and they too will erode the buying power of borrowers. This has been a largely understood space for some time, but as inflation continues to outpace wages, this will have a growing negative effect on the buyer’s ability to borrow. This is simply shifting payments from principle into insurance. What is missing from the “crash” in ‘08?: Leverage So just understanding that buyers are going to lose buying capacity in a given market doesn’t result in a crash, it just means that home prices will contract. What is still missing in this equation is selling pressures.  The housing crisis wasn’t just the rising cost of home prices, it was also the deterioration of credit quality borrowers, and excess leverage. As the housing market of the early 2000s looks eerily similar in growth, an important distinction is made between the two when we look at the leverage ratio of borrowers. This is a result of the bad actors in the housing crisis leveraging one house with another, and another, and another. This allowed the rampant contagion of home selling. One default in the leverage on leverage structure meant that a single default meant 2 or more defaults as a result. The low credit quality and poor borrowing strategies (adjustable rate mortgages, and subprime lending) meant that all borrowing became interconnected. Now while the current system has become somewhat lax on the underwriting standards again, the use of adjustable mortgages and equity requirements for vacation and second homes remains largely intact. Limiting the contagion of contraction to single borrowers. What is missing from the “crash” in ‘08?: Employment Employment is well below 4% and that is encouraging. That means that there is plenty of demand for workers and that if a borrower is qualified when they are employed, the risk of losing that employment is at its lowest point ever. Broadly speaking this means that it’s worth keeping an eye on, but will limit the amount of forced selling that could trigger a true “crash”. 

Read More »
April 1, 2022 No Comments

Pin It on Pinterest