InSight

Managing the 1031 Exchange Rules for Vacation Homes, Conversions and Mixed Use Properties

Financial Planning Dentist

It is quite common for clients to call a 1031 exchange company with questions regarding exchanges of their former or future principal residences or vacation homes. After all, if you can have a rental property with some side benefits, it would be the best of two worlds, right? Well, we will discuss the requirements you should be aware of as you evaluate the replacements.

So these are the questions imbedded in the 1031 Exchange requirements that must be answered: 

  • Under what circumstances can these dwellings be used as part of a 1031 exchange?  
  • Do they satisfy the requirement that both the relinquished and replacement properties must be held for investment or for use in a business or trade?  
  • Does some personal use trump the investment use of the property?  

This article is intended to answer these commonly asked questions:

  • Under what circumstances can a second home or vacation home constitute relinquished or replacement property for the purposes of a 1031 exchange?
  • Can a principal residence be converted into an investment property eligible for 1031 tax deferral upon sale?
  • Can a property that has been held for investment be converted to a principal residence and what are the rules when it is sold?
  • Can a mixed-use property be sold with a personal residence exemption and 1031 exchange deferral?

Rules for Including a Vacation Home in a 1031 Exchange

Historically, determining whether a home that was both rented out and used by its owner could be eligible for a 1031 tax deferral was difficult to ascertain.  There was some case law but that was a bit inconsistent.  The IRS attempted to provide some definitive guidance regarding some of these questions in the form of Revenue Procedure 2008-16.  As the IRS aptly put it:

“The Service recognizes that many taxpayers hold dwelling units primarily for the production of current rental income, but also use the properties occasionally for personal purposes. In the interest of sound tax administration, this revenue procedure provides taxpayers with a safe harbor under which a dwelling unit will qualify as property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment under §1031 even though a taxpayer occasionally uses the dwelling unit for personal purposes.”

This revenue procedure made clear that for a relinquished vacation property to qualify for a 1031 exchange, the property has to be owned by the taxpayer and held as an investment for at least 24 months immediately prior to the exchange.  Additionally, within each of the two 12-month periods prior to the sale, the property must have been rented at fair market value to a person for at least 14 days or more, and the taxpayer cannot have used the property personally for the greater of 14 days or 10% of the number of days in the 12-month period that it had been rented. 

The requirements for a property to qualify as a 1031 replacement property are very similar.  The property has to be owned by the taxpayer for at least 24 months immediately after the exchange.  Also, within each of the two 12-month periods after the exchange, the property must have been rented at fair market value to a person for at least 14 days or more and the taxpayer cannot have used the property personally for the greater of 14 days or 10% of the number of days in the 12-month period that it had been rented.  

The taxpayer is allowed to use the relinquished or replacement property for additional days if the use is for property maintenance or repair. These days and the project and maintenance completed should be documented thoroughly.

Rules for Converting a Personal Residence for a 1031 Exchange

In many cases, conversion of a personal residence to a property held as an investment or for use in a business or trade “exchange eligible property,” as defined above, may still allow a taxpayer to receive a full exemption of gain pursuant to the rules of 

Internal Revenue Code (IRC). The comprehensive set of tax laws was created by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This code was enacted as Title 26 of the United States Code by Congress and is sometimes also referred to as the Internal Revenue Title. The code is organized according to the topic and covers all relevant rules pertaining to income, gift, estate, sales, payroll, and excise taxes.

Internal Revenue Code Section 121 upon sale of the property.  That Code section provides for an exclusion of gain of up to $250,000 for single taxpayers and $500,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly upon the sale of a principal residence.  There is a requirement that during the five-year period immediately preceding the sale, the taxpayer must have used the property as a principal residence for a cumulative period of at least two years. 

Even if the property has had principal residence use followed by exchange eligible use, the taxpayer does not necessarily have to do an exchange on the investment/business use of the property if the total gain can be sheltered by the §121 allowed exclusions.  So even if during the immediate two years preceding the sale, the property was used as exchange eligible property, the taxpayer may still benefit from the personal residence exclusion.  In the event, the gain exceeds the maximums allowed for per IRC Section 121 primary residence, the taxpayer may still be able to shelter the balance via a 1031 exchange, thus combining the benefits of these two code sections.

Under Revenue Procedure 2008-16 the conversion of the principal residence to an exchange eligible investment property does not disqualify a family member as the tenant.  However, the revenue procedure requires that this should be done at a fair market rental and it must constitute the family member’s personal residence and not the family member’s vacation home.  There are additional rules for the rental of the property by a family member who co-owns the property with the taxpayer.

Should a taxpayer wish to convert the personal residence to exchange eligible property, the taxpayer must have owned the property for the two years immediately prior to the sale and:

  1. For each of the years, the property must be rented to a person for 14 days or more
  2. The taxpayer’s personal use has to be limited to no more than 14 days per year or less than 10% of the days per year that property is rented.

Rules for Converting a 1031 Exchange Property to a Personal Residence

If the taxpayer’s intent, based upon facts and circumstances at the time of the property acquisition was to hold the property as an investment or for use in a business, the subsequent conversion use of the property to use as a principal residence should not otherwise jeopardize the ability to exchange.  As an example, a taxpayer may wish to exchange into a rental condominium in Florida and upon retirement relocate from a northern state into the condominium as the principal residence.

If the taxpayer subsequently sells the principal residence, there may be the ability to defer the gain under §121.  However there are some limitations to this deferral upon conversion, otherwise, taxpayers might convert exchange property into a principal residence property, sell shortly thereafter, and seek IRC Section 121 primary residence deferral.  These rules require that the property has to be held for at least five years in total with the period of time the property was held as an exchange property included.  The period of time the property was used as an exchange property needs to be backed out of the calculation for the principal residence use deferral.  This calculation is made by using the period of time the property was held as an exchange property as the numerator and the period of time the property was held in total as the denominator.  The resulting fraction or percentage would be applied to the total gain and the resulting dollar amount would not be eligible for a §121 deferral. 

Take the example of a property owned by a taxpayer for seven years prior to sale, three of which were used as an exchange property and four of which were used as the taxpayer’s principal residence.  Assume that the gain upon sale is $200,000.  Dividing the number of three years by seven years x $200,000 results in the amount of $85,714 which is taxable.

1031 Exchanges and Mixed-Use Properties

At times, a taxpayer may own a home as the principal residence but part of the property may have been used as an investment or in connection with a business or trade, creating an exchange eligible component.  This is known as a mixed-use property.  An example might be a psychologist who sees patients in a home office.  Another example might be a property with a separate coach house that is rented out.  It is quite common for a taxpayer to sell a three-flat where the taxpayer uses one unit as the principal residence.  In these instances IRC Section 121 and IRC Section, 1031 can both be used to achieve total deferral.    

There is one caveat with exchanges of mixed-use properties, which is that on closing statements there is a tendency to give credits for prorated rent and security deposits to the buyer.  This causes the net amount of proceeds attributable to each property use component to be reduced proportionately.  Technically, those credits only pertain to the exchange eligible portion of the property and should not appear as a credit on the personal residence portion of the sale.

Summary

A variety of circumstances surround the property that has been or will exchange eligible and may also have been used or will be used by the taxpayer as a principal residence or vacation home.  Revenue Procedure 2008-16 provides rules regarding vacation homes and exchange eligible property.  Likewise, there are rules under IRC Section 121 for converting exchange property into a personal residence and vice-versa.  Properties that have both a principal residence component as well as an exchange-eligible one can benefit from both the deferral sections, but care should be taken to do proper accounting so that buyer credits affect the exchange eligible portion of the sale only.

More related articles:

Boulder Investment Experts
New
Kevin Taylor

Understanding the Guyton-Klinger Guardrails Method: A Superior Strategy for Retirement Income Management

When it comes to managing retirement income, the Guyton-Klinger guardrails method stands out as a robust strategy, offering a dynamic approach to withdrawals that adjusts based on market performance. Unlike static withdrawal strategies, such as the 4% rule, the Guyton-Klinger method provides a flexible framework that helps retirees adapt their spending in response to changing market conditions. But who is this method best suited for, and why is it considered superior to traditional methods of managing investment risk and distributions? Who is the Guyton-Klinger Guardrails Method Best For? The Guyton-Klinger guardrails method is particularly well-suited for: Retirees Seeking Stability and Flexibility: Retirees who want a systematic approach to adjusting their spending in response to market fluctuations will benefit from this method. It offers clear guidelines for when to increase or decrease withdrawals, providing peace of mind and reducing the stress associated with market volatility. Advisors and Clients Focused on Long-Term Sustainability: Financial advisors and their clients who prioritize the sustainability of retirement portfolios will find the Guyton-Klinger method advantageous. It helps ensure that retirees do not outlive their savings by making necessary adjustments when needed. Those Comfortable with Variable Income: Individuals who can tolerate some variability in their annual income will appreciate this approach. The method’s built-in adjustments mean that spending can increase in good years and decrease in bad years, which requires a degree of financial flexibility. Why is the Guyton-Klinger Method Superior? The Guyton-Klinger guardrails method offers several advantages over traditional static withdrawal strategies: Dynamic Adjustments: Unlike the 4% rule, which suggests withdrawing a fixed percentage of the initial portfolio each year adjusted for inflation, the Guyton-Klinger method adjusts withdrawals based on the performance of the portfolio. This dynamic approach helps protect against the risk of depleting the portfolio during prolonged market downturns. Clear Guidelines for Adjustments: The method establishes specific “guardrails” for when to increase or decrease withdrawals. For instance, if the portfolio withdrawal rate falls 20% lower than the initial rate, withdrawals are increased by 10%. Conversely, if the withdrawal rate rises 20% higher, withdrawals are decreased by 10%. These clear, predefined rules remove the guesswork and help maintain the portfolio’s longevity. Reduction in Spending Volatility: By avoiding knee-jerk reactions to market declines and instead implementing gradual adjustments, the method smooths out income volatility. This is crucial for retirees who rely on their portfolio for steady income. Enhanced Communication and Client Understanding: For financial advisors, the Guyton-Klinger method provides a framework that makes it easy to communicate with clients. The specific guardrails offer a transparent and understandable plan for managing withdrawals, which can help build trust and ensure clients feel more secure about their financial future. The Mechanics of the Guyton-Klinger Method To better understand why this method is superior, let’s delve into its mechanics: Initial Withdrawal Rate: Set at the beginning of retirement, this rate is typically between 4% and 6%, depending on individual circumstances. Upper Guardrail: If the portfolio’s withdrawal rate drops 20% below the initial rate, it triggers a 10% increase in withdrawals. Lower Guardrail: If the portfolio’s withdrawal rate increases 20% above the initial rate, it triggers a 10% decrease in withdrawals. Inflation Adjustments: Withdrawals are adjusted for inflation annually, but this adjustment is skipped if the trailing 12-month return is negative. Longevity Consideration: No decreases in withdrawals are triggered during the final 15 years of the retirement plan, ensuring that retirees are not forced to make severe spending cuts late in life. The Guyton-Klinger guardrails method represents a significant advancement in retirement income planning. By providing a structured yet flexible approach to withdrawals, it helps retirees manage their portfolios more effectively, ensuring long-term sustainability and reducing the anxiety associated with market volatility. This method is particularly beneficial for those who seek a balance between stable income and the ability to adapt to changing market conditions. For financial advisors, it offers a clear, communicable strategy that enhances client trust and understanding. In a world where retirees face increasing uncertainty, the Guyton-Klinger guardrails method stands out as a superior approach to managing investment risk and distributions.

Read More »
real estate investing, boulder Colorado financial planning,
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Location one of the six critical factors in real estate investing

Investing in real estate can be a lucrative way to build wealth, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all approach. One of the most critical factors to consider before investing in real estate is location. Hence the adage “location, location, location!!!” Anticipating location in real estate involves identifying up-and-coming areas before they become popular and investing in properties in those locations. This requires research into economic and population trends, as well as an understanding of the local real estate market. Anticipating location can be a savvy strategy for real estate investors, as it can lead to higher property value appreciation and cash flow potential. However, it also requires a certain level of risk-taking, as investing in a location before it becomes popular can be uncertain. Nevertheless, anticipating location is an important skill for real estate investors to develop in order to stay ahead of the curve and maximize their investment returns. Location is key because it can determine the property’s potential value, cash flow, and overall return on investment. Here are a few reasons why location is an essential factor to consider before investing in real estate: Value Appreciation Potential Location is a major factor in property value appreciation. Real estate values are heavily influenced by the desirability of the location. Properties in desirable locations typically appreciate faster and have a higher resale value than those in less desirable locations. A prime location is one where demand is high, such as close to major employment centers, good schools, shopping centers, and entertainment hubs. Investing in property in a prime location ensures that your investment will appreciate over time. Cash Flow Potential The location of the property plays a significant role in determining the cash flow potential of the investment. For rental properties, a good location can mean the difference between high occupancy rates and a high vacancy rate. A desirable location can also command higher rents, which can increase your cash flow. Conversely, investing in a property in a less desirable location could result in lower rental income and higher vacancy rates. Ease of Property Management The location of the property also impacts the ease of property management. For example, if you’re investing in a rental property, you’ll need to consider the location’s proximity to the property and your ability to manage it effectively. Investing in a property that is close to your home or office can make it easier to manage and respond to issues promptly. Economic Trends Economic trends, such as job growth and population growth, can have a significant impact on real estate values. Investing in a location with a robust economy and population growth can mean a better chance of property value appreciation and increased demand for rental properties. Resale Potential Lastly, the location of the property can impact its resale potential. Properties in desirable locations tend to sell faster and at a higher price than those in less desirable locations. Investing in a property in a prime location ensures that you have a better chance of a profitable resale in the future. Location is a top three critical factor to consider before investing in real estate. It affects the property’s potential value appreciation, cash flow, ease of management, economic trends, and resale potential. By investing in a prime location, you increase your chances of realizing a good return on investment and building long-term wealth.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest