InSight

What might a Russian war do to markets?

Financial Planning Dentist

It feels so good to write an article about something other than the virus that shall not be named. And I feel I have a better understanding of geopolitical movements and markets than I did with the nuance of microbiology. Additionally, we have far more applicable historical references for the Russian invasion scenario than we do for global pandemics. 

If you are not interested in geopolitics and markets, this is one of my favorite moments in Seinfeld that will sum up the below with brevity:

 

Phase 1: Short Sharp Shock

Markets hate uncertainty, war and conflict certainly provide that. And while markets react quickly and usually down to news like this, they are short-lived. Additionally, markets are made of many different companies and commodities and several react positively in times of uncertainty. The market is resilient, and while near-term moves are disruptive, they don’t change the economics of the world.

Historically, markets shrug off geopolitical upheavals. More so in the last two decades. Removing the domestic attacks in New York and Boston total stock market moves on the heels of global conflict is less than 1% on average.

We are likely between 2 weeks and 3 months of a lack of clarity in the Russia/Ukraine invasion. The inflation expectations and federal rate hikes will have a larger impact on pricing in the market that window. Inflation will not be resolved in the short run and is being adjusted in the market. Also,  the rate hikes we expect will create volatility are running their course. These are more critical to the health of the markets than the whims of eastern European dictators. 

There is not a recession on the horizon, employment is too low, and demand is too high.= 

Phase 2, Russia is not economically important (neither is Ukraine)

Forgetting the fact that many of us have grown up on James Bond and his constant runs with the KGB, Russia is a 3rd world dictatorship with a limited capacity to alter global commerce and economics. Russia is a failed democratic state in eastern Europe (there are several to choose from) it just has a larger landmass than the others we can name. 

Russia is a large oil exporter, and Ukraine is 61st on that list. This may cause a spike in the near-term costs of crude as a result, but the economic size of these companies is small and limited in reach. I think people are too soon to forget, the last invasion of Ukraine by Russia was in 2014 (and they still occupy Crimea today).

While an oil spike has historically caused distortions in the equity markets. It also brings margins into several of the United States oil producers. But the OVX (oil volatility index) has moved from the low 40’s to the high 40’s, which is not a signal that oil traders are buying up the oil panic.  

Sanctions, particularly on those who do business with Russia post-invasion, will hamper those companies and countries. But few of them are not prepared for this event that has been weeks in the making. And very few of the SP500 companies, and our portfolio for you, have major exposures to eastern Europe.

Russia and its decisions to be “anti-western” and “anti-capitalist” have mitigated its ability to be an important economic center for almost my whole life (there was a brief window from 1991 to 1997 where it was possible, but that’s gone). Markets will move on from today’s press conference.

Phase 3, a Return to fundamentals

The actions of the FOMC are allowing markets to reprice risk and growth. And while this is causing a short-term drop in the multiples companies are trading at, it doesn’t change the underlying fundamentals of the economy. 

Labor inflation is here to stay, it is a stubborn number. But the by-product is more money in the hands of workers and the employed which is good for the economy. The inflation caused by supply chain issues will be corrected by the market in the near term. This means wages rise for the foreseeable future, but prices of products eventually come down (but not below pre-pandemic levels).

Fundamental investing is volatile, mostly because it is dependent on the earnings of specific companies and sectors which change. As we remove the nearly limitless supply of money coming into the economy, it will prove that some companies with wide, defensible margins, will survive and others won’t.

This is not a market for heroes! The last 3 years have produced +28%, +16%, and +26% in upside for equities, some pullback was inevitable. Fixed income is still not a great play. Bonds are selling off wildly, and the expectation that the Fed leaves this market will only accelerate the bond woes. Short duration and corporate bonds are the only suitable investments for fixed income and even those sectors will require a strong stomach. 

The fed will not be able to raise rates seven times in the next 18 months. There will be setbacks where rates are left to pause as markets get frustrated. Jerome Powell is a market-centric fed chair. He, and others, will adjust to accommodate capital markets.

More related articles:

Boulder
Articles
Peter Locke

Why I moved to Boulder, Colorado and started my own Registered Investment Advisory Business

To start, I grew up in Northern Virginia, right outside of Washington D.C. I am the youngest of three boys who live all over the United States and proud son of my mother and father. Growing up my parents or schools never taught me the importance of investing or planning. My parents taught me to work hard, get a good job, and make sure you buy things on sale. My mother, no matter what, cooked every night and took pride in providing us the best life possible.  Health was her main focus and my father’s area of expertise was academia. However, my great grandfather was a pioneer in the investing space.  His legacy provided three generations the ability to go to college debt free. This provided my parents the opportunity to give us the best that education had to offer and catapulted me into where I am today here in Boulder. His desire to give future generations this opportunity is something I’ve now dedicated my life to as well. Early in my life I learned that the greatest currency in life is the effect that you have on other people. When I was at summer camp as a young man, I learned invaluable lessons that I still live by today. Those lessons taught me that if I dedicate myself to others and help guide them through one of the most difficult things we have to handle as individuals, finances, then I will find all of the fulfillment I need.  Unfortunately, our education system does a very poor job of educating our youth to make good financial decisions. We’re taught the more you make the more you can have and we live in a never ending cycle of wanting more. Over the past decade of working in Boulder with individual clients and families, I’ve learned some of the biggest mistakes people have made and why they make them. I’ve also learned what the most successful people in some of the most affluent cities in the U.S. do to accumulate and keep wealth. The financial advising world, however, has a bad name and for good reason. For far too long, advisors were and still are, compensated for the wrong reasons like selling their own products for commissions. In my opinion, financial advisors should never be able to sell products for commissions. It represents far too big of a conflict of interest and should be done away with. However, we aren’t there yet even though there is a big movement to do so.  That leaves me with where I am today.  Starting my own advisory firm with a business partner that shares my same vision in Boulder, CO.  Now I can proudly say, I’ve never sold my own product or fund to a client. At big firms, you’re told to stay in the corporate lanes of what can be offered to clients. This goes beyond not being able to help clients with questions around stock advice. You’re given strict instructions to never tell clients about third-party solutions that would better meet their needs, or share a name of a company/person for tax planning, estate planning, insurance planning, mortgages, 529 plans, brokers, or retirement plan administrators or companies.  Even when you’re a CFP® professional, you’re bound by the same restrictions.  How could I continue serving clients in a holistic manner as their fiduciary when I can really only help them with the investment piece? The investment solutions I was selling though were fine. They gave clients well-diversified portfolios for a percentage of assets under management. The problem was, we were giving clients a solution that met the company’s guidelines, meaning, it wasn’t really my advice. If the clients had a certain net worth, made a certain income, and said they could handle a certain amount of risk, the ‘algorithm’ spit out a couple of portfolios that the company said we could give to the client. This is not financial planning. Although it was appropriate for some clients that just wanted something very safe and didn’t have the time, desire, or expertise to do it on their own, it wasn’t adequate if you truly wanted to be their fiduciary and meet the standards of the CFP® Board. So I left.   I no longer could work for a firm that wasn’t allowing me to serve clients in the manner they need to be served. I needed to offer clients solutions that would serve them more than investment management based on a theory (Modern Portfolio Theory) that was developed almost 70 years ago. Now I am not saying or attempting to say the theory is incorrect by any stretch of the imagination, but what I am saying is, right now a large portion of the theory isn’t doing what it has in the past and portfolio managers across the country aren’t adapting accordingly.  The clients I worked with for many years here in Boulder, knew they didn’t get rich with their investment strategy. They got rich with their savings and spending strategy. They focused on key elements like automating a certain amount of savings for their retirement and after-tax accounts before spending. They knew if they could save 20%-30% of their income they could retire earlier and live a more fulfilling life. To clarify, they didn’t live a better life because they had more in their retirement accounts. They had prioritized what was important, like focusing on shared experiences with family and friends, traveling, exercising, eating better instead of buying the newest and shiniest clothes, cars, and things. They stayed disciplined with their strategies as they knew that tinkering with their investments or savings meant prolonging their working days. They surrounded themselves with the right people, the right process, and the policies to hold them accountable and that’s what my business partner and I at InSight will do for our clients.  As fiduciaries in Boulder, we will always put the client first. 

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Tax Mitigation Playbook: Who can use 1031 Exchanges?

Section 1031 of the tax code allows property owners to defer taxes on the sale of their real estate held for business or investment purposes. At InSight, we use this for several strategic and preference-based reasons for clients (See What is a 1031 Exchange for more)  This is Key: The only requirement for a person or entity to be eligible for an exchange is that it is a US tax-paying identity. All taxpayers qualify as individuals, partnerships, limited liability companies, S corporations, C corporations, and trusts. There are no citizenship requirements for an exchange, meaning that you are eligible for an exchange as long as you pay taxes to the US.  This requirement includes DACA recipients or foreign companies. Keep in mind that the same taxpayer that sells the relinquished property must also purchase the replacement property. The same taxpayer requirement refers to tax identity, not necessarily the name on the property’s title. A taxpayer can preserve tax identity without holding title under their name by holding title under a “tax disregarded entity,” which is not considered separate from its owner for tax purposes. Entities such as a single-member LLC, a trustee of a revocable living trust, or a tenant in common are examples of a tax disregarded entity.  Taxpayers may also hold title under a Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) which is a real estate investment vehicle that provides investors with access to investment-grade real estate that is generally larger than they could have acquired on their own. The Taxpayer acquires a fractional interest in the property. The use of DSTs in 1031 exchanges was approved by the IRS in Revenue Procedure 2004-86. Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) or Illinois Type Land Trust beneficiary. The tax gain can be deferred if tax‐deferred exchange requirements are satisfied and the sale proceeds are reinvested in like‐kind property.

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Using a Delaware Statutory Trusts (DST) with 1031 Exchange Investments

Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) are extremely popular with 1031 exchange investors. In addition to the tax mitigation aspects of the 1031 itself, they allow investors to diversify the make-up of an investment portfolio, access new buildings and investment types, and easily scale up or down the size of their real estate portfolio. 1031 exchange investors favor DSTs due to the fact that it can be difficult to identify a replacement property within 45 days and in most cases, the DST can accept the exact balance investors are looking to replace a part of the 1031 Exchange. What is a Delaware Statutory Trust? The name will usually confuse new investors. The “Delaware” in Delaware Statutory Trusts is simply a component of the law being initially conceived and developed in Delaware. A common state for incorporation and legal standing. The use of the DST structure helps keep the title clean in connection with ownership by many co-investors. It separates the investor holding title individually into a holding in a new trust where the investor is the beneficial owner. The trustee of the trust can take actions on behalf of the trust beneficiaries (i.e. the DST investors/owners) which does not require agreement by all. Why invest in a DST? Few investors have the requisite net worth to own a 30-story office complex and keep the real estate exposure for their portfolio in line with their risk expectations. That is where the use of DSTs comes into play. A DST is attractive to an investor who desires access to a single property or portfolio of high-value, high-quality real estate asset(s) that may not otherwise be available to them due to size or service constraints. A DST puts the management and ownership of a real estate venture into a manageable box for most investor types. Collecting income, managing taxes, and maintaining the risk are all far easier in the real estate space through the DST structure. The investor receives a deeded fractional ownership in the property in a percentage based upon the equity invested. Is a DST like a REIT? It has some characteristics of a REIT or Real Estate Investment Trust but is different, including the fact that it is often, but not always, just a single property. In addition, the owner of REIT shares holds a partnership interest in the underlying real estate investment. Partnership investments do not qualify for 1031 exchange investments, even if the underlying asset consists of real estate. How does the DST provide income? Similar to the other real estate investments, DSTs generally pay monthly or quarterly an amount based on the excess rent over the property expenses. This includes any mortgage payments so as the debt service is paid, the equity ownership of the investor shifts as well. The Return on Equity (RoE) varies from deal to deal based on the specifics of the property, the building type, and financing goals. With most deals, the sponsor knows the net rent that can be expected and can give the investor the anticipated return for the term of the investment. How long does the DST operate? Most DSTs have a well-defined expectation for liquidation of the asset. The asset’s holding period varies and is prescribed in the beginning, but most have an intermediate time frame. Usually, 3-7 years and the investor shares in the same percentage basis the appreciation in value upon sale of the property. How does the liquidation work? This final stage of a DST is a complete liquidation of the Real Estate assets. This is also part of the investor’s stake in the holding. This can increase the overall annualized return by a couple of percentage points and is paid out in cash upon liquidation. While most investors seek out real estate for the prospect of a current and predictable income – tax mitigated capital appreciation as part of the real estate investment is typically the larger portion of the total return of the investment. Who can buy into a DST? The manner in which DSTs are marketed to the public has a lot of characteristics of sales of securities. Over time, the SEC decided to regulate them as actual sales of securities. So, although a DST interest retains the nature of real estate ownership, with some exceptions, they are regulated. They are typically brought to market for syndication by large well-known sponsors, although they have to be acquired through a Broker, Registered Investment Advisor, or a licensed Financial Advisor. The DST structure usually, if not always, requires the investor meets the Accredited Investor standard as the offerings are listed through the Reg D issuing process. Typically, the broker or advisor will vet all offerings of the sponsors with whom they have an agreement and that level of due diligence is a benefit to the investor who is unlikely to have the wherewithal to review the investment as closely.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest