InSight

Market InSights:

When does a Bear look like a Bull? (Pt. 1)

Four things to avoid and four things to embrace when the Bear turns into a Bull.

 

A Bear Rally is a short, swift, updraft in stocks that can end as quickly as it began. Here are the four signals to avoid.

Markets will routinely go through bouts of extreme buying during a bear market. There are several fundamental and technical reasons why markets “rally” at these times amid broader weakness in the market. The market this time has just come off its 4th bear market rally of the 2022 selloff.

Boulder Colorado Investment Management
All Four Bear Rallies

These “false” turnarounds can be frustrating to the casual observer. A feeling that the market is random and chaotic can lead people to become frustrated during these moments of euphoria, only to be quickly rebuffed by another violent selloff.

At some point, these turnarounds stay intact and the Bear market rally is seen for what it is, the beginning of the next bull.

Here are some of the important topics to keep in mind to determine if we are looking at a new Bull, or another Bear.

Markets are Money with Emotion – Bear Rally (4)

If markets were perfectly logical they would be rather dull. If smart people reached the same conclusion regarding the future value of dollars (inflation), corporate revenue (earnings), and cost of capital (debt) then the auction that is the market would see a very narrow band of trading. But, it’s not, there is a maelstrom of emotion that accompanies markets and this market is no exception.

Boulder Colorado Investment Advisor
Bear Market Rally Four

The rally from the June lows, to the most recent selloff, started at the Fed meeting in June and ended in mid-August (Bear Rally 4). The “Dovish Pivot” was the culprit – the belief that a small part of Jerome Powell’s update in June was dovish, and the “feeling” that the rate hiking cycle would come to an end sooner. This was both a fundamental shift in markets and an emotional one. One that we at InSight, didn’t share. We either didn’t hear this new dovishness, or we didn’t believe in it. 

This Bear rally was an abrupt reversal of the trend based on emotion, which you might assume is not a reliable and lasting reason for markets to change course, and you would be right. These good times were quickly brought to an end with more commentary from fed chairs and economists in August and were fully doused by Powell’s speech on September, 21st.

Trading markets on emotions is hard, and for that, we look for momentum to confirm our emotions and use the MACD reading to understand when emotional buying has turned into momentum buying. We try not to fight the momentum in markets.

The “Narrow” rally – Bear Rally (2)

When markets turn around, it happens quickly, and no one wants to “miss out” on the bottom. This causes abrupt buying at symbolic (not fundamental) levels or in single stocks or sectors. Some stocks serve as a bellwether for markets, Trains, Chips, and Logistics companies can tell us when the market is healthy and the supply chain orderly. But when one group of stocks march higher alone, it is likely a false rally and they will routinely be brought back with the border market.

The US Technology Index registered a bear market on March 14 when it closed down 19.8% from its peak on Nov. 22. The index then zipped higher, gaining 17.3% as of March 29 before resuming its downward trend. The index lost 27% between its March 29 close and its June 16 low.

boulder financial planning experts expert portfolio management
Bear Market Rally Two

There was a “buy the dip rally” in a Bull Market for well over a decade. So, traders and investors have been conditioned to buy up markets trading on lows. Markets registering short-term (1 and 3 month lows) have been quickly reversed since the financial crisis.

The great financial crisis ushered in an era of seemingly unlimited accommodation from the Fed and every dip was met with more and more liquidity from investors and the government. Operating in unison, the market drawdowns were short, and bull rallies were profitable.

The Bear Rally (2) of this cycle was met with no such injection from the Fed and the rally petered out when traders ran out of money. This reversal was confirmed as the market headed lower from Bear End (2) into Bear Start (3). A lack of dry powder meant there was less capacity to continue buying up the market. 

There was no confirmation in the rest of the market, and it was proof that while technology is the most important sector in the SP500, it alone cannot fix weaknesses in other market sectors.

Oversold conditions cause “snapbacks” – Bear Rally (1)

Beware of Oversold conditions that cause bear-market rallies. This is also known as a bear trap, a sucker’s rally, or a “dead cat bounce.” Frequently bottoms are found when conditions on the Relative Strength Index (RSI) reads “oversold” so traders and investors misinterpret these as bottoms, especially early in a bear market. The Bear Rally (1) is a good example of this:

Boulder Colorado Investment Management
Bear Market Rally One

A phenomenon in bear market rallies is the snapback or dead-back bounce. When stock prices deteriorate so quickly, the oversold conditions are met, and the traders look to profit off the short-lived really to come. Oversold conditions are routinely bought up quickly – but they are quickly reversed when the longer trend catches up with the short-term trend. Oversold, or overbought conditions are usually reached when a chart favors the bias of a daily trend over a weekly trend. 

Rallies based on “oversold” conditions very rarely last longer than a couple of weeks. 6-15 trading days at the most, before the more powerful long-term trend, exerts its pressure over the short term.

More related articles:

Parenting, Boulder, Money, Saving Learning Money Habits
Articles
Kevin Taylor

The Tangible Lessons of Money: Why Kids Should Start with Physical Cash Before Going Digital

In an era where digital transactions and virtual currencies dominate the financial landscape, the value of understanding physical money should not be underestimated, especially for children.  The transition from earning, saving, and spending physical cash before delving into more modern financial methods offers a wealth of indispensable lessons that build a strong foundation for financial literacy. This article explores why it’s crucial for kids to grasp the tangible aspects of money before embracing the virtual alternatives and why the painful lessons of losing or misplacing cash hold invaluable teachings. Hands-On Learning Physical cash serves as an excellent teaching tool for introducing kids to the concept of money. Tangible currency provides a sensory experience that engages sight, touch, and even sound. Children can hold, count, and visually differentiate between various denominations. This tactile interaction fosters a deeper understanding of the value of money compared to merely viewing numbers on a screen. Real-World Connection Money is an abstract concept for young minds. Like distances or time children may find it hard to construct a framework for learning these ideas. Unlike other abstract ideas, money has a physical representation in the form of currency. Physical currency bridges the gap between this abstraction and the real world. Kids can connect chores, allowances, and monetary rewards with the physical notes and coins they receive. This connection lays the groundwork for comprehending the value of work, patience, and the trade-offs associated with spending choices. Delayed Gratification Physical cash creates the proper “challenge of delayed gratification.” When children can visually witness their money pile up, and have it in their possession they are challenged with the impulse to spend it. My mom always said it was “Burning a hole in my pocket.” If children are never confronted with that impulse, that sense of urgency, they will rarely overcome it. Conflict is an important part of our development of Good money habits. The act of saving becomes more tangible when they see their funds grow over time. This valuable lesson in patience and discipline paves the way for healthier financial habits in the future. Understanding Loss and Consequences One of the most profound lessons that physical money imparts is the experience of loss. While parents naturally shield their children from the pain of losing or misplacing money, this very pain provides an essential life lesson. The emotional impact of losing a few dollars due to carelessness can be a powerful incentive for kids to be more responsible with their possessions and money. This is definitely a point of conflict I reach with other parents, who chose to insulate their children from this pain – though I would rather my child experience the devastation their carelessness has from the loss of say $20, then $20,000.   These losses, though small, teach resilience, accountability, and problem-solving skills that virtual transactions often lack. I know this might seem like a “willful” intent to have my children experience pain…and it is…but I think it’s an earned lesson that we ought not to rob our children of.  Lessons in Budgeting Physical cash inherently imposes limits on spending. Kids can visually see when their wallet is getting emptier, which prompts them to make choices about what they want versus what they need. This limitation introduces them to the concept of budgeting, a skill that becomes increasingly important as they navigate more complex financial scenarios in the digital world. DON’T PAY THE SALES TAXES OR SHIPPING COSTS!!! Another essential lesson that physical cash transactions can teach kids is the concept of sales taxes. I see many parents paying the sales tax or shipping costs of purchased items. Just Don’t; this is a huge opportunity to teach a lesson about where taxes come from and the effect it has on buying power. While these taxes might not be explicitly stated on price tags, they are a part of many purchases. When kids pay with physical money, they often hand over more than the price of the item due to sales tax. This provides a valuable opportunity to discuss the role of taxes in society, as well as the importance of understanding the total cost of an item. By engaging with these real-world examples, children gain insight into how governments fund public services and the broader economic landscape. I have had to see my child walk out of a toy store in tears because he had to put an item back as the result of sales tax…this lesson is priceless! He wasn’t mad at me, he was mad at taxes. In the digital age, it’s easy to browse online marketplaces and make purchases with a few clicks. However, the true cost of an item might not be immediately apparent. Shipping fees can significantly increase the total expense, especially for items ordered from different locations. When kids use physical cash for purchases, they have a chance to experience the cost of this convenience firsthand. Whether it’s buying a gift online or ordering a favorite book, involving children in the payment process allows them to witness the final price and the added shipping cost. This lesson highlights the importance of considering all expenses before making a purchase, promoting critical thinking and wise decision-making. A Concrete Value of Money In the digital realm, the value of money can feel elusive, as transactions are reduced to numbers on a screen. Physical cash, on the other hand, provides a concrete representation of that value. Kids can witness the exchange of goods or services for money firsthand. This real-time experience helps them understand that money is earned through effort and must be spent wisely. Embracing Technology Later The transition from physical cash to digital transactions becomes more seamless when kids have a solid foundation in understanding money’s tangible aspects. Armed with lessons in earning, saving, spending, loss, and budgeting, children can approach the digital world of finance with a more critical mindset. They are better equipped to navigate the complexities of online banking, digital wallets, and virtual currencies, making informed decisions that align

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Biden’s Proposed Budget on 1031 Exchanges

Analyzing the Impact of Biden’s Proposed Budget on 1031 Exchanges The release of President Biden’s FY 2025 Budget, outlined by the US Department of Treasury in what is colloquially known as the “Green Book,” suggests implementing strict limitations on IRC Section 1031. This section currently allows for the deferral of taxes on real estate exchanges, potentially leading to significant repercussions for various sectors, including real estate, small businesses, and overall economic growth. Biden’s Budget Proposal for 1031 Exchanges The US Department of Treasury’s publication of President Biden’s FY 2025 Budget, commonly referred to as the “Green Book,” introduces the notion of imposing stringent constraints on IRC Section 1031. Under the current setup, this section enables tax deferrals on real estate exchanges, but the proposed budget aims to alter this dynamic. The suggested amendment recommends capping the deferral of gains at $500,000 for individuals ($1 million for married couples filing jointly) per annum for similar real estate exchanges. Any gains surpassing this threshold would be subject to immediate taxation when the property is transferred by the Exchanger. Potential Ramifications of Budget Changes on 1031 Exchanges Should the proposed $500,000 cap on 1031 Exchanges be enacted, studies indicate adverse economic implications. Here are several reasons highlighting the detrimental effects a $500,000 limit could have on the economy: 1. Impact on Real Estate Investment and Liquidity: Current 1031 Exchanges incentivize reinvestment in real estate by deferring capital gains taxes. However, introducing a cap could hinder investors’ ability to participate in larger transactions, potentially decreasing liquidity in the real estate market. 2. Reduction in Property Transactions: A limitation may deter property owners from engaging in 1031 Exchanges due to increased tax burdens, subsequently slowing down property transactions and economic activity within the real estate sector. 3. Potential Detriment to Small Businesses: The proposed cap could disproportionately affect small businesses and investors who rely on 1031 Exchanges to manage their property portfolios, hindering their ability to expand or optimize holdings. 4. Impact on Economic Growth: 1031 Exchanges stimulate economic growth by promoting investment and job creation. Imposing hard limits on these exchanges could impede these economic accelerators. Studies, such as one conducted by Professors Ling & Petrova, suggest that restricting or eliminating 1031 Exchanges would lead to decreased real estate transactional activity, increased capital costs, and a contraction in GDP. Furthermore, research from Ernst & Young in 2021 indicates that 1031 Exchanges support job creation, and labor income, and contribute significantly to the US GDP and tax revenues. Advantages of 1031 Exchanges 1031 Exchanges offer benefits across various sectors of the economy, allowing individuals and businesses to optimize property ownership to match their needs efficiently. These exchanges also facilitate job creation across industries such as construction, finance, and real estate services. Moreover, they contribute to neighborhood revitalization and affordable housing development, particularly in low-income and distressed communities where external capital may be scarce. The outcome of the Budget Proposal While President Biden’s budget estimates $1.86 billion in annual revenue from capping 1031 Exchanges, the projected revenue pales in comparison to the substantial tax revenue generated by these exchanges. Therefore, restricting 1031 Exchanges appears ineffective and counterproductive from a fiscal standpoint. Industry Support for 1031 Exchanges Various entities within the 1031 Exchange industry, including Accruit, are mobilizing to advocate for maintaining 1031 Exchanges in their current form. These efforts include engaging with policymakers to underscore the importance of preserving 1031 Exchanges for economic stability and growth. In conclusion, President Biden’s proposed budget changes to limit Section 1031 could have far-reaching negative effects on the real estate market and the broader economy. As industry leaders, it is imperative to rally support for maintaining the current framework of 1031 Exchanges, emphasizing their pivotal role in fostering economic stability and growth.

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Tax Mitigation Playbook: 1031 Replacement Rules to Know

The 3-Property Rule The 3-property rule states that the replacement property identification during the initial 45 days of the exchange can be made for up to three properties regardless of their total value. After relinquishing their initial property, the taxpayer can identify and purchase up to three replacement properties. A qualified intermediary often requires that a taxpayer state how many replacement properties they intend to acquire to prevent common pitfalls surrounding the receipt of excess funds and the early release of funds. The 200% Rule If a taxpayer were to identify more than three properties, they could still have a valid exchange by following the 200% rule. The 200% rule states that a taxpayer may identify and close on numerous properties, so long as their combined fair market value does not exceed double the value of their relinquished property. Using the listing price is usually a safe way of determining a fair market value for a property. The 95% Rule If the taxpayer has overidentified both of the previous rules by identifying more than three properties, and their combined value being more than 200% of the relinquished property value, the 95% value comes into play. The 95% rule defines that identification can still be considered valid after breaking the first two rules if the taxpayer purchases through the exchange at least 95% of what they identified.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest