InSight

Market InSights:

When does a Bear look like a Bull? (Pt. 1)

Four things to avoid and four things to embrace when the Bear turns into a Bull.

 

A Bear Rally is a short, swift, updraft in stocks that can end as quickly as it began. Here are the four signals to avoid.

Markets will routinely go through bouts of extreme buying during a bear market. There are several fundamental and technical reasons why markets “rally” at these times amid broader weakness in the market. The market this time has just come off its 4th bear market rally of the 2022 selloff.

Boulder Colorado Investment Management
All Four Bear Rallies

These “false” turnarounds can be frustrating to the casual observer. A feeling that the market is random and chaotic can lead people to become frustrated during these moments of euphoria, only to be quickly rebuffed by another violent selloff.

At some point, these turnarounds stay intact and the Bear market rally is seen for what it is, the beginning of the next bull.

Here are some of the important topics to keep in mind to determine if we are looking at a new Bull, or another Bear.

Markets are Money with Emotion – Bear Rally (4)

If markets were perfectly logical they would be rather dull. If smart people reached the same conclusion regarding the future value of dollars (inflation), corporate revenue (earnings), and cost of capital (debt) then the auction that is the market would see a very narrow band of trading. But, it’s not, there is a maelstrom of emotion that accompanies markets and this market is no exception.

Boulder Colorado Investment Advisor
Bear Market Rally Four

The rally from the June lows, to the most recent selloff, started at the Fed meeting in June and ended in mid-August (Bear Rally 4). The “Dovish Pivot” was the culprit – the belief that a small part of Jerome Powell’s update in June was dovish, and the “feeling” that the rate hiking cycle would come to an end sooner. This was both a fundamental shift in markets and an emotional one. One that we at InSight, didn’t share. We either didn’t hear this new dovishness, or we didn’t believe in it. 

This Bear rally was an abrupt reversal of the trend based on emotion, which you might assume is not a reliable and lasting reason for markets to change course, and you would be right. These good times were quickly brought to an end with more commentary from fed chairs and economists in August and were fully doused by Powell’s speech on September, 21st.

Trading markets on emotions is hard, and for that, we look for momentum to confirm our emotions and use the MACD reading to understand when emotional buying has turned into momentum buying. We try not to fight the momentum in markets.

The “Narrow” rally – Bear Rally (2)

When markets turn around, it happens quickly, and no one wants to “miss out” on the bottom. This causes abrupt buying at symbolic (not fundamental) levels or in single stocks or sectors. Some stocks serve as a bellwether for markets, Trains, Chips, and Logistics companies can tell us when the market is healthy and the supply chain orderly. But when one group of stocks march higher alone, it is likely a false rally and they will routinely be brought back with the border market.

The US Technology Index registered a bear market on March 14 when it closed down 19.8% from its peak on Nov. 22. The index then zipped higher, gaining 17.3% as of March 29 before resuming its downward trend. The index lost 27% between its March 29 close and its June 16 low.

boulder financial planning experts expert portfolio management
Bear Market Rally Two

There was a “buy the dip rally” in a Bull Market for well over a decade. So, traders and investors have been conditioned to buy up markets trading on lows. Markets registering short-term (1 and 3 month lows) have been quickly reversed since the financial crisis.

The great financial crisis ushered in an era of seemingly unlimited accommodation from the Fed and every dip was met with more and more liquidity from investors and the government. Operating in unison, the market drawdowns were short, and bull rallies were profitable.

The Bear Rally (2) of this cycle was met with no such injection from the Fed and the rally petered out when traders ran out of money. This reversal was confirmed as the market headed lower from Bear End (2) into Bear Start (3). A lack of dry powder meant there was less capacity to continue buying up the market. 

There was no confirmation in the rest of the market, and it was proof that while technology is the most important sector in the SP500, it alone cannot fix weaknesses in other market sectors.

Oversold conditions cause “snapbacks” – Bear Rally (1)

Beware of Oversold conditions that cause bear-market rallies. This is also known as a bear trap, a sucker’s rally, or a “dead cat bounce.” Frequently bottoms are found when conditions on the Relative Strength Index (RSI) reads “oversold” so traders and investors misinterpret these as bottoms, especially early in a bear market. The Bear Rally (1) is a good example of this:

Boulder Colorado Investment Management
Bear Market Rally One

A phenomenon in bear market rallies is the snapback or dead-back bounce. When stock prices deteriorate so quickly, the oversold conditions are met, and the traders look to profit off the short-lived really to come. Oversold conditions are routinely bought up quickly – but they are quickly reversed when the longer trend catches up with the short-term trend. Oversold, or overbought conditions are usually reached when a chart favors the bias of a daily trend over a weekly trend. 

Rallies based on “oversold” conditions very rarely last longer than a couple of weeks. 6-15 trading days at the most, before the more powerful long-term trend, exerts its pressure over the short term.

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

Biden’s Proposed Budget on 1031 Exchanges

Analyzing the Impact of Biden’s Proposed Budget on 1031 Exchanges The release of President Biden’s FY 2025 Budget, outlined by the US Department of Treasury in what is colloquially known as the “Green Book,” suggests implementing strict limitations on IRC Section 1031. This section currently allows for the deferral of taxes on real estate exchanges, potentially leading to significant repercussions for various sectors, including real estate, small businesses, and overall economic growth. Biden’s Budget Proposal for 1031 Exchanges The US Department of Treasury’s publication of President Biden’s FY 2025 Budget, commonly referred to as the “Green Book,” introduces the notion of imposing stringent constraints on IRC Section 1031. Under the current setup, this section enables tax deferrals on real estate exchanges, but the proposed budget aims to alter this dynamic. The suggested amendment recommends capping the deferral of gains at $500,000 for individuals ($1 million for married couples filing jointly) per annum for similar real estate exchanges. Any gains surpassing this threshold would be subject to immediate taxation when the property is transferred by the Exchanger. Potential Ramifications of Budget Changes on 1031 Exchanges Should the proposed $500,000 cap on 1031 Exchanges be enacted, studies indicate adverse economic implications. Here are several reasons highlighting the detrimental effects a $500,000 limit could have on the economy: 1. Impact on Real Estate Investment and Liquidity: Current 1031 Exchanges incentivize reinvestment in real estate by deferring capital gains taxes. However, introducing a cap could hinder investors’ ability to participate in larger transactions, potentially decreasing liquidity in the real estate market. 2. Reduction in Property Transactions: A limitation may deter property owners from engaging in 1031 Exchanges due to increased tax burdens, subsequently slowing down property transactions and economic activity within the real estate sector. 3. Potential Detriment to Small Businesses: The proposed cap could disproportionately affect small businesses and investors who rely on 1031 Exchanges to manage their property portfolios, hindering their ability to expand or optimize holdings. 4. Impact on Economic Growth: 1031 Exchanges stimulate economic growth by promoting investment and job creation. Imposing hard limits on these exchanges could impede these economic accelerators. Studies, such as one conducted by Professors Ling & Petrova, suggest that restricting or eliminating 1031 Exchanges would lead to decreased real estate transactional activity, increased capital costs, and a contraction in GDP. Furthermore, research from Ernst & Young in 2021 indicates that 1031 Exchanges support job creation, and labor income, and contribute significantly to the US GDP and tax revenues. Advantages of 1031 Exchanges 1031 Exchanges offer benefits across various sectors of the economy, allowing individuals and businesses to optimize property ownership to match their needs efficiently. These exchanges also facilitate job creation across industries such as construction, finance, and real estate services. Moreover, they contribute to neighborhood revitalization and affordable housing development, particularly in low-income and distressed communities where external capital may be scarce. The outcome of the Budget Proposal While President Biden’s budget estimates $1.86 billion in annual revenue from capping 1031 Exchanges, the projected revenue pales in comparison to the substantial tax revenue generated by these exchanges. Therefore, restricting 1031 Exchanges appears ineffective and counterproductive from a fiscal standpoint. Industry Support for 1031 Exchanges Various entities within the 1031 Exchange industry, including Accruit, are mobilizing to advocate for maintaining 1031 Exchanges in their current form. These efforts include engaging with policymakers to underscore the importance of preserving 1031 Exchanges for economic stability and growth. In conclusion, President Biden’s proposed budget changes to limit Section 1031 could have far-reaching negative effects on the real estate market and the broader economy. As industry leaders, it is imperative to rally support for maintaining the current framework of 1031 Exchanges, emphasizing their pivotal role in fostering economic stability and growth.

Read More »
Articles
Peter Locke

Divorcing Women and their Unheard Financial Goals

Financial problems are one of the most cited causes of divorce and crafting a Divorce Financial Plan can be your best opportunity for a new start. The compounding stresses of money management and home economics can act as an accelerant for the underlying causes of marital strife and ultimately divorce. It should also come as no surprise that divorce often results in a change in financial direction for both parties, who through the process of divorce find they have several financial goals and needs that are not part of the current marital financial plan. So for one of the parties, it’s time for a change in the methods, tools, and priorities addressed in the financial plan.  On the heels of a divorce, here are some of the most commonly shared priorities that went unaddressed in prior relationships with investment professionals and financial advisors: 66% Hope to pay off debt accrued in or before the divorce 41% Want to save for a comfortable retirement 38% Would like to start or have a  larger emergency fund 34% Would like less risky investments 27% Would like a new home 20% Want more new streams of reliable income 19% Are hoping to build their wealth through investments 12% Want to gain confidence in their insurance  We feel that most of the divergence between the goals of these surveyed divorcees and their financial plans started long before the divorce proceedings. The disconnect between the financial goals of a single party and those established in a marital financial plan likely existed well before the topic of divorce arose and stems from a lack of communication and shared vision.   A staggering majority of recently divorced women comment that their post-divorce financial plan looks nothing like their marital financial plan. Furthermore, an alarming number of women developing a financial plan reveal that they have not yet discussed these priorities with a financial professional which begs the question of how a financial plan that fails to uncover the goals and needs of the woman became enshrined in the first place. As a result, many don’t have a clear path on how to achieve their stated financial goals.  These unheard financial goals compound the already frustrating and stressful situation a divorce brings.  A Certified Divorce Financial Analyst® or CDFA® can play a significant role when uncovering the value of shared assets, divining a tax-based strategy for the future value of different investment types, and assisting in dividing marital assets during the divorce process. Additionally, a CFP® professional can assist you in understanding your options, documenting your financial goals, and putting you in the best position possible to help you achieve your financial goals post-divorce. Generally speaking, women live longer, have different expectations for their money, and prioritize investment returns and strategies. As such, their financial plans should be developed differently. Having a financial advisor by their side during divorce is crucial for combining their long-term financial planning expectations with their current asset make-up. If from the outset, a divorcee lays out a road map for their financial life, the advisor and attorney can better negotiate the terms of the settlement for their shared client. However, in a 2018 survey by the publication Worthy survey, 56% of women getting a divorce, discussed the marital house and debt as a priority, but only 48% discussed taxes, 34% discussed alimony, and 39% discussed the ongoing cost of child care. All of these have a more impactful weight on the long-term success of retirement and the border financial plan.  This makes working with a CDFA® and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ even more crucial when facing a divorce. A financial professional can help you overcome emotional turmoil to bring you the financial vision and stability you deserve after divorce. The Complete Playbook

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

The Declining Faith in European Pensions and Its Impact on US Investment Markets

As young Europeans increasingly lose faith in the solvency of their governments’ pension systems, a significant shift in global investment patterns is emerging. This trend, driven by economic uncertainties and demographic challenges in Europe, is leading to a surge of investment flows into the US markets, positioning American companies as key beneficiaries of this financial migration. Declining Trust in European Pension Systems Several factors contribute to the growing skepticism among young Europeans regarding the future of their pensions. A primary concern is the demographic shift towards an aging population. According to Eurostat, the old-age dependency ratio in the European Union is projected to increase from 31% in 2019 to 57% by 2100, placing enormous pressure on public pension systems. This demographic imbalance means fewer workers will be supporting more retirees, raising doubts about the sustainability of state-funded pensions. Economic uncertainties also play a crucial role. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing financial strains on European governments, leading to increased public debt and budget deficits. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) highlighted that public debt in the euro area surged to 97% of GDP in 2021, up from 83% in 2019. These economic challenges have intensified concerns about the ability of governments to fulfill their long-term pension commitments. Additionally, political instability in several European countries has further eroded confidence. For instance, countries like Italy, Spain, and Greece have faced significant political turmoil in recent years, impacting their economic policies and adding to the uncertainty about the future of pension systems. Young Europeans’ Response to Pension Uncertainty The response of young Europeans to these pension concerns has been a marked shift in investment behavior. Many are seeking more reliable and potentially lucrative investment opportunities outside of Europe. According to a 2024 survey by the European Commission, 60% of young Europeans (aged 18-35) do not believe they will receive adequate pensions from their governments, prompting them to look for alternative retirement savings options. The US Stock Markets as an Investment Haven In this context, the US stock markets have emerged as a preferred destination for European investors. Several factors contribute to this trend: Robust Economic Performance: The US economy has shown remarkable resilience and growth potential, even amidst global uncertainties. The US Federal Reserve’s policies and strong corporate performance have bolstered investor confidence. Diversified Market Opportunities: The US markets offer a wide array of investment opportunities across various sectors, including technology, healthcare, and consumer goods. The dominance of US tech giants such as Apple, Amazon, and Google attracts international investors seeking growth and innovation. Stability and Regulatory Environment: The US regulatory framework is perceived as stable and investor-friendly. This stability, combined with the transparency and liquidity of US financial markets, makes them an attractive option for foreign investors. Increasing Investment Flows into US Markets The influx of European investment into US markets is already noticeable. Data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis regarding the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) indicates a significant rise in foreign investments in US stocks and bonds over the past few years. According to the SEC, foreign holdings of US equities reached $11.1 trillion at the end of 2022, with European investors accounting for a substantial portion of this increase. Investment firms have also noted this trend. BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, reported a significant increase in European clients investing in US-focused funds in 2023 compared to the previous year. This shift is driven by the desire for higher returns and greater financial security. The growing distrust in the sustainability of European pension systems is leading young Europeans to seek more reliable investment opportunities abroad. The US stock markets, with their robust performance, diverse opportunities, and stable regulatory environment, have become an investment haven for these investors. As this trend continues, we can expect a sustained increase in investment flows into American companies, further bolstering the US economy and providing new growth opportunities for both US and European investors.

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest