InSight

Market InSights:

When does a Bear look like a Bull? (Pt. 2)

When will a Bear-Market Rally form a New Bull?

The market will turn around, they always do, some would argue that they are built to expand. Below are some of the elements we look for to determine if a market is turning around, or if we are looking at another Bear Rally. 

Rallies will get longer in time, and less dramatic 

The drama of a bear market is exciting and news outlets love it. The markets and the news gravitate towards those chaotic headlines. This was easily seen when during the last Bull market news outlets ran headlines and talking heads marking the top, declaring market “warnings” and finding economists that would deride the market. It’s exciting and captures eyeballs…the turnaround won’t be all that exciting. 

There won’t be a day of major capitulation, followed by a counter move to the upside. It will come with steady, long-term grinds up. It will come with the whole market moving up in a coordinated and cooperative way. Markets with a broad influence from several sectors that grind out small moves over a long time are far more attractive to investors and generate a virtuous cycle. 

The Bear Rallies of 2022 so far…

 

Days

Percent

Daily %

Bear Rally (1)

9

6.1%

0.67%

Bear Rally (2)

11

9.9%

0.90%

Bear Rally (3)

12

6.2%

.51%

Bear Rally (4)

41

14.3%

.34%

Bear Rally (5)

?

?

?

The median gain of the largest rallies that have occurred within bear markets is 11.5% over 39 days. Typically, the rallies on the low side of the median, occur early in the bear market, while those that exist on the high side are in the more mature parts of the bear market.

Additionally, there are far more rallies below the mean, than above. Meaning that we will see more false rallies that are short and volatile and only a few long-term sustainable rallies that are long with small moves.

The longer these rallies get, and the smaller the moves, the more likely an “all clear” can be declared. 

There will be broad support  

Investment professionals look for certain technical signals to be in place before confirming a reversal is underway. There are several measuring sticks that look for broad support in trading. The advance-decline line, trades above the moving average, and the McClellanOscillator are examples of technical measurements of the breath the market is moving, for how many stocks and how many sectors are participating in the move. 

“Breadth thrust” is the term for these signals, and a leading indicator if a market is transitioning from a Bear to a Bull. The duration of the move and the price gains associated with it are also important. The indicators that most reliably confirm that there is a shift into a new bull market are:

Flows into equities and out of cash in important ETFs

There are “traders” ETFs, and there are “investors” ETFs, and knowing the difference is important.

If dollars are flowing into leveraged high volatility trading products it is a signal that the market is trading for a short-term and volatile swing (read a bear rally). If money flows are going into long-term holds that cover the whole of a market in balanced and long-term ways, it’s a signal that the investment appetite is changing to a more long-term outlook and investors are building a new core of their profile. Outsized flows into SPY, QQQ, or VOO are a good sign that the broad market is healthy and investors are willing to hold the whole of the market. 

The current market is witnessing the worst first half for stocks and bonds in 50 years, the highest inflation in 40 years, and an endless barrage of bad economic data. So seeing a broad, coordinated shift from cash and cash-like funds, into broad equity will be a good sign in a change from “risk off” to diversified “risk on”.

Earrings being “better than expected” at more and more companies

There is an entire industry reporting on “beats and misses” on companies’ earnings. While individual stock stories are exciting and reported on the news, the sizes and frequency of misses vs. beats are often overlooked. 

Wall Street pros are at odds as to whether we are at an inflection point in the markets. That inflection point will be confirmed when estimates, which are increasingly bleak, are replaced by corporate earnings that are better than expected. This will take several quarters and is a laggard indicator. But is the most reliable measurement to say the companies that make up the market are in a healthy and expansionary space. This seachange in earnings will likely happen 2-3 quarters after the market has “bottomed”, so while not a great trading and timing indicator, it is a very good indicator of changes in the macroenvironment.

Company earnings are a more reliable indicator of investment health, this is not a shocking revelation. But the frequency and diversity by which these companies manage inflation pressures, and sell their product to the marketplace is a tide that raises all boats and encourages board participation in rising stock prices. 

What past Bear-Markets tell us about future ones

A peek at the history of bear markets would suggest that the “naysayers” are on the right side of history, at least for a time. In the 30 different bear markets that have occurred since 1929, the stock market registered an average decline of 29.7%. These downturns lasted have lasted for an average of 341 days. 86% of the bear markets last less than 20 months, and few last longer than one year.  

Right now, according to traditional economic interpretations, the U.S. could well be in a recession. We have seen two-quarters of GDP contraction. The Commerce Department reported that gross domestic product shrank by 0.9% in the second quarter of, after contracting 1.6% in the first quarter of this year. That’s it, that is the traditional definition of a recession, and the Bear market has priced that move in as a result. 

So why the “is this a recession this time” talk? Well, there has been a rash of different pro-growth data that has persisted. Wages have grown, unemployment has stayed low, and demand for freight, semiconductors, and component raw materials has been high. These would indicate that demand is still healthy. How can you have a recession with such a demand for materials? 

If the Fed can achieve the delicate balance of taming inflation by slowing the economy without tipping the country into a recession, this bear market could already be long in the tooth. If we count the correction from the November high, we will be entering the second year of the bear market next month. The one-year mark for this Bear market would come in March of 2023 (just around the corner by economic standards – meaning we are currently in the 3rd or 4th inning of the Bear Market with the most violent changes in pricing behind us. This would be an “un-recessionary bear market”

If the Fed fails in a “soft landing” in the first quarter of next year more reliable indicators of recession (falling commodity prices, major spikes in unemployment, and weakening manufacturing outlooks) are on the rise before the Fed quells inflation then we can see a more elongated bear market and a full-blown recession. 

More related articles:

Private Placements
Articles
Peter Locke

Private Placements in your IRA & 401(k)

A Self-Directed IRA (SDIRA) is very similar to a traditional IRA but gives you more ways to diversify your investments and retirement savings and can include using Private Placements. The SDIRA gives you greater control and flexibility by investing in things you know and believe in by widening your investment selections into your areas of interest or expertise.  Unlike your typical bank or brokerage account, you’re not limited to where you invest. The SDIRA gives you the ability to find alternative investments like real estate, private companies, start-ups, LLCs, LPs, etc.  At InSight, we partner with the Entrust Group to help administer the accounts, and empower our clients to invest in the things they’re passionate about to help them achieve their goals. Entrust shares our core beliefs that client’s should be able to find new ways to increase their potential for growth, protect their net worth against economic fluctuations through diversification, take more control, and grow their savings and retirement in tax advantaged accounts.  Being in Colorado, we’re surrounded by entrepreneurial leaders from technology to pharmaceuticals and we want our clients to get invested in those companies if they desire. Through Private Placements, our clients can invest in privately-held companies. Since a lot of those companies have a hard time getting the funding required to reach their goals, you could be the one that gets them the additional funding they need which spurs the company to new heights. Whether it’s LLCs, C-Corps, Private stock, Partnerships, Private Placements, business, or notes you can invest in almost anything. Private Placements allows companies to raise money by selling stocks, bonds, or other instruments. Some but not all offerings are exempt from federal securities registration requirements, meaning they may or may not have to comply with registration requirements of a public securities offering (meaning more risk if they don’t and less transparency).  It is extremely important that you make sure of a couple of key items before making this type of investment.  Before any investment do your due diligence. This can mean your own research, hiring someone to do a valuation, or a combination of both.  Understand your own liquidity needs and the liquidity of any investment prior to investing. Some investments in private placements require holding periods of 5-10 years so if you need or may need that money before or during that period then investing that money in that strategy isn’t for you. If you’re retired, you need to take RMDs. If you don’t have available funds the penalties for not taking it are extremely high You may be responsible for taxes in your IRA depending on if earnings are paid out or not LLCs can be considered securities and may be required to meet the standards of security offerings In order to make an investment like a Private Placement, you must be an accredited investor. Meaning, your net worth (excluding your primary residence) must exceed 1 million or you have to have income exceeding $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with a spouse exceeding $300,000 for those years and a reasonable expectation of the same income level in the current year.  Risks of Private Placements even after doing your due diligence and research include: They’re not reviewed by regulators at the state or federal level and therefore have become a haven for fraud. They’re now the most frequent source of enforcement cases conducted by state securities regulators in North America.  Background checks of sellers, officers, or managers may not have been conducted  Generally speaking, they’re illiquid, and investors may have to hold their investments indefinitely Investors are usually provided minimal disclosure information than a public offering, meaning investors know much less about the investment itself and the people running the show The value of the asset may be provided by a qualified third party, but they must provide sufficient supporting documentation with the Fair Market Valuation Form. FMV Form How to protect your investment: Surround yourself with people to help you, processes to research and understand the investment, and policies to hold you accountable Don’t complete an agreement or questionnaire unless you fully understand it Hire a 3rd party professional to review the document and investment If you’re asked to falsify information, walk away If your gut is telling you no because of a lack of clarity you should probably trust it Invest in what you know Request as much information as you can and ask every question you want

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Euro-Trap: The Trap of Low Valuations Amid Declining Fundamentals

In recent months, investors seeking diversification have been drawn to European equities, attracted by their seemingly inexpensive valuations, low price-to-earnings (P/E) and price-to-book (P/B) ratios compared to the overheated valuations of U.S. markets.  On the surface, these metrics offer a compelling narrative: European stocks are significantly cheaper than their U.S. counterparts, promising potential for higher returns as markets normalize. Yet, these valuations are not necessarily indicative of opportunity but rather a reflection of deeper, systemic issues plaguing the region’s economy. Europe’s industrial heart, once a powerhouse of global manufacturing and innovation, now struggles under the weight of low GDP growth, rising unemployment, and declining corporate earnings. Economic expansion in the eurozone has slowed to a crawl, with Vanguard’s projections for 2025 GDP growth at a mere 0.5%, underscoring the region’s persistent inability to rebound from the energy crisis and other structural inefficiencies. Rising unemployment—forecasted to hit 6.9%—exacerbates these woes, signaling broader challenges in labor market adaptability and productivity. These economic struggles are compounded by structural risks, including the looming specter of tariffs that threaten to undermine Europe’s export-driven economy. Trade tensions with the United States have escalated, and any new tariff measures on key sectors like automotive manufacturing could deliver a significant blow to economic activity in major industrial hubs such as Germany and France. Additionally, declining earnings across sectors signal that the region’s companies are struggling to navigate an environment marked by persistent inflationary pressures, weakening external demand, and high levels of debt. For many firms, the low valuations investors find appealing are symptomatic of these fundamental weaknesses rather than hidden potential. Taken together, these factors suggest that European equities may be a trap for unwary investors, lured by attractive metrics but unaware of the precarious foundation underpinning the region’s markets. Understanding these dynamics is essential for making informed investment decisions in a landscape fraught with risks. The Economic Landscape: Subdued Growth and Rising Unemployment The euro area’s economic outlook is fraught with difficulties. Vanguard’s recent economic report projects GDP growth of a mere 0.5% year-over-year for 2025, far below the region’s long-term trend. This sluggish growth stems from persistent weaknesses in the manufacturing sector, ongoing repercussions from the energy crisis, and weakening external demand. Germany, often considered the industrial engine of Europe, exemplifies these struggles. Industrial production has been declining steadily, as supply chain disruptions and softening global demand weigh heavily on output. Meanwhile, the broader region’s unemployment rate is forecasted to rise to 6.9% by year-end 2025, driven by slowing economic activity and structural inefficiencies. This figure reflects not just cyclical challenges but also deeper issues, such as a failure to implement productivity-enhancing reforms and adapt to technological advancements. Inflation Erodes Earnings and Competitiveness While headline inflation in the euro area has declined from its October 2022 peak of 10.6%, core inflation remains sticky. Both headline and core inflation are projected to fall below 2% only by the end of 2025. However, inflationary pressures have already eroded corporate earnings across the region, particularly in energy-intensive industries and consumer sectors. Companies have struggled to pass on rising costs to consumers, leading to margin compression and weakening bottom-line performance. Adding to the economic malaise is the looming threat of a dovish monetary policy pivot by the European Central Bank (ECB). While the ECB is expected to reduce its policy rate to 1.75% by the end of 2025, this move could signal a lack of confidence in the region’s recovery prospects, further unsettling markets. Valuation Metrics: A Double-Edged Sword European equities are undeniably cheaper than their U.S. counterparts, with the Stoxx Europe 600 Index trading at a 47% discount on a P/E basis and a 61% discount on a P/B basis. However, these metrics may not indicate value but rather reflect the market’s justified concerns about the region’s future earnings potential. Historical data shows that low valuations often coincide with declining revenues and profits. For instance, European companies with net debt exceeding 50% of market capitalization have consistently underperformed, and many sectors—including telecommunications and traditional manufacturing—are burdened by structural inefficiencies and high leverage. Currency Risk: The Hidden Drag on Returns For American investors, currency risk adds another layer of complexity to investing in European equities. The euro has been weakening against the U.S. dollar due to divergent economic growth trajectories and monetary policy stances between the two regions. While the Federal Reserve has maintained a relatively hawkish stance, the European Central Bank’s dovish pivot has placed downward pressure on the euro. This currency depreciation means that even if European equities deliver modest gains in local currency terms, those returns can be significantly eroded when converted back to dollars. For instance, a 5% gain in euro-denominated equities could be entirely offset by a 5% decline in the euro-to-dollar exchange rate, leaving U.S.-based investors with flat or negative returns. Moreover, a weaker euro increases the cost of importing goods and services, exacerbating inflationary pressures within the eurozone and further weighing on corporate margins. This creates a feedback loop that dampens both the economic outlook and investment returns, particularly for foreign investors who must navigate these currency fluctuations. The Impact of Tariffs and Trade Tensions Compounding Europe’s woes is the specter of new tariffs, which threaten to disproportionately impact the region. Trade tensions between the U.S. and Europe have escalated, with potential tariffs on European automotive exports and other industrial goods looming large. These measures could further dampen Europe’s export-driven economy, exacerbating the challenges faced by key sectors. The automotive industry, which accounts for a significant portion of Europe’s GDP and employment, is particularly vulnerable. With major automakers reliant on exports to the U.S. and other global markets, tariffs could trigger job losses and deepen the economic slowdown in manufacturing hubs like Germany and France. The Spillover Effect of U.S. Market Corrections Investors hoping to escape the turbulence of U.S. markets by pivoting to Europe may find little refuge. Historically, major drawdowns in U.S. equities have dragged European markets down with them. American investors, who now own an estimated 30% of European

Read More »
Boulder Investment Experts
Articles
Kevin Taylor

USA’s Credit Rating Downgraded – What it Means for the Economy and Lessons from the Past

USA’s Credit Rating Downgraded – What it Means for the Economy and Lessons from the Past The U.S. has had its 2nd downgrade in 12 years Equity and debt markets and the broader economy are highly correlated to the strength of U.S. Creditworthiness Politics and Debt Debates are wearing on credit agencies’ willingness to underwrite poor behavior and political infighting In a surprising turn of events, the credit rating of the United States has been downgraded to AA+ from AAA, a rating the U.S. has held at Fitch since 1994, signaling a potential cause for concern in the country’s financial stability. The downgrade comes as a result of several key factors that have raised worries among investors and financial experts. Expected Fiscal Deterioration: The downgrade reflects concerns about the future financial situation of the US over the next three years. Experts fear that the government’s ability to manage its finances may deteriorate, potentially leading to a higher risk of defaulting on its debt. Growing Debt Burden: Another significant issue is the increasing debt burden that the US has been facing. The government has been accumulating more debt, which raises questions about its ability to repay the money it has borrowed. Erosion of Governance: Over the past two decades, there has been a steady decline in the quality of governance in the US. This is evident in the way the government has repeatedly struggled to reach agreements on the debt limit, leading to last-minute resolutions. Such instability erodes confidence in the government’s fiscal management. The consequences of this downgrade could be far-reaching, impacting various aspects of the economy. One potential concern is that it might lead to a lack of confidence in US bonds, which are essential for the government to borrow money. If investors become skeptical about the government’s ability to pay back its debts, they may demand higher interest rates on US bonds, making it costlier for the government to borrow money. The US government’s deficit, which is the amount by which government spending exceeds its income, is expected to increase. In 2023, it is predicted to reach 6.3% of the country’s total economic output (GDP), which is quite high compared to previous years. By 2025, it might even widen further to 6.9% of GDP. Moreover, the level of debt compared to the size of the economy is projected to rise over the forecast period, reaching 118.4% of GDP by 2025. This level of debt is significantly higher than what is considered safe for countries with strong financial standings. One potential consequence of the downgrade is the risk of a mild recession in the US economy. Tighter credit conditions, weakening business investment, and slower consumption could lead to economic growth slowing down. This, in turn, may impact job opportunities and the overall well-being of the population. To address these issues, the US Federal Reserve has been raising interest rates. While this can help control inflation, it may also make borrowing money more expensive for businesses and consumers. The Federal Reserve faces the challenge of balancing economic growth with the need to manage inflation. It is important for the US government to take swift and effective action to address these financial challenges. Failure to do so could lead to more difficulties in the future and potentially impact the financial stability of the nation. Despite the downgrade, the US still possesses some strengths that support its financial standing. Its large, advanced, and diversified economy, coupled with the US dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency, provides the government with exceptional financing flexibility. In August 2011, a similar event occurred when Standard & Poor’s (S&P) downgraded the credit rating of the United States from AAA to AA+. This had significant effects on financial markets and the overall economy: Market Turmoil: The downgrade triggered widespread market turmoil. Stock markets experienced sharp declines, and investors panicked as they worried about the stability of the US economy and its ability to repay its debts. Increased Volatility: Financial markets became more volatile in the wake of the downgrade. Investors became uncertain about the future, leading to wild swings in asset prices and increased risk aversion. Higher Borrowing Costs: The downgrade led to increased borrowing costs for the US government. As investors perceived the risk of holding US government debt to be higher, they demanded higher yields on US Treasury bonds. This, in turn, increased the interest payments that the government had to make on its debt, putting additional strain on the budget. Impact on Consumer Confidence: The downgrade had a negative impact on consumer confidence. When people see negative news about the economy, they become more cautious about their spending and saving habits, potentially leading to decreased consumer spending, which is a significant driver of economic growth. Weakened Dollar: The US dollar, which had long been considered a safe-haven currency, faced pressure due to the downgrade. As investors sought safer alternatives, the value of the dollar depreciated against other currencies. Impact on Global Markets: The downgrade had ripple effects on global financial markets. Many countries and institutions around the world hold US Treasury bonds as part of their investment portfolios, and the downgrade caused concern about the stability of these holdings. Political Fallout: The downgrade also led to political fallout within the US. It intensified debates and disagreements among policymakers about how to address the country’s fiscal challenges and reduce its debt burden. It’s worth noting that while the 2011 downgrade had significant short-term effects on financial markets, the US economy eventually recovered. However, it serves as a reminder of the importance of fiscal responsibility and prudent financial management to maintain investor confidence and economic stability. Addressing the challenges posed by the downgrade requires swift and effective action by the US government. Measures to control debt, improve governance, and foster sustainable economic growth are essential to restore investor confidence. Despite the downgrade, the US still possesses strengths, including a large and advanced economy, and the status of the US dollar as the world’s primary

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest