InSight

Market InSights:

When does a Bear look like a Bull? (Pt. 2)

When will a Bear-Market Rally form a New Bull?

The market will turn around, they always do, some would argue that they are built to expand. Below are some of the elements we look for to determine if a market is turning around, or if we are looking at another Bear Rally. 

Rallies will get longer in time, and less dramatic 

The drama of a bear market is exciting and news outlets love it. The markets and the news gravitate towards those chaotic headlines. This was easily seen when during the last Bull market news outlets ran headlines and talking heads marking the top, declaring market “warnings” and finding economists that would deride the market. It’s exciting and captures eyeballs…the turnaround won’t be all that exciting. 

There won’t be a day of major capitulation, followed by a counter move to the upside. It will come with steady, long-term grinds up. It will come with the whole market moving up in a coordinated and cooperative way. Markets with a broad influence from several sectors that grind out small moves over a long time are far more attractive to investors and generate a virtuous cycle. 

The Bear Rallies of 2022 so far…

 

Days

Percent

Daily %

Bear Rally (1)

9

6.1%

0.67%

Bear Rally (2)

11

9.9%

0.90%

Bear Rally (3)

12

6.2%

.51%

Bear Rally (4)

41

14.3%

.34%

Bear Rally (5)

?

?

?

The median gain of the largest rallies that have occurred within bear markets is 11.5% over 39 days. Typically, the rallies on the low side of the median, occur early in the bear market, while those that exist on the high side are in the more mature parts of the bear market.

Additionally, there are far more rallies below the mean, than above. Meaning that we will see more false rallies that are short and volatile and only a few long-term sustainable rallies that are long with small moves.

The longer these rallies get, and the smaller the moves, the more likely an “all clear” can be declared. 

There will be broad support  

Investment professionals look for certain technical signals to be in place before confirming a reversal is underway. There are several measuring sticks that look for broad support in trading. The advance-decline line, trades above the moving average, and the McClellanOscillator are examples of technical measurements of the breath the market is moving, for how many stocks and how many sectors are participating in the move. 

“Breadth thrust” is the term for these signals, and a leading indicator if a market is transitioning from a Bear to a Bull. The duration of the move and the price gains associated with it are also important. The indicators that most reliably confirm that there is a shift into a new bull market are:

Flows into equities and out of cash in important ETFs

There are “traders” ETFs, and there are “investors” ETFs, and knowing the difference is important.

If dollars are flowing into leveraged high volatility trading products it is a signal that the market is trading for a short-term and volatile swing (read a bear rally). If money flows are going into long-term holds that cover the whole of a market in balanced and long-term ways, it’s a signal that the investment appetite is changing to a more long-term outlook and investors are building a new core of their profile. Outsized flows into SPY, QQQ, or VOO are a good sign that the broad market is healthy and investors are willing to hold the whole of the market. 

The current market is witnessing the worst first half for stocks and bonds in 50 years, the highest inflation in 40 years, and an endless barrage of bad economic data. So seeing a broad, coordinated shift from cash and cash-like funds, into broad equity will be a good sign in a change from “risk off” to diversified “risk on”.

Earrings being “better than expected” at more and more companies

There is an entire industry reporting on “beats and misses” on companies’ earnings. While individual stock stories are exciting and reported on the news, the sizes and frequency of misses vs. beats are often overlooked. 

Wall Street pros are at odds as to whether we are at an inflection point in the markets. That inflection point will be confirmed when estimates, which are increasingly bleak, are replaced by corporate earnings that are better than expected. This will take several quarters and is a laggard indicator. But is the most reliable measurement to say the companies that make up the market are in a healthy and expansionary space. This seachange in earnings will likely happen 2-3 quarters after the market has “bottomed”, so while not a great trading and timing indicator, it is a very good indicator of changes in the macroenvironment.

Company earnings are a more reliable indicator of investment health, this is not a shocking revelation. But the frequency and diversity by which these companies manage inflation pressures, and sell their product to the marketplace is a tide that raises all boats and encourages board participation in rising stock prices. 

What past Bear-Markets tell us about future ones

A peek at the history of bear markets would suggest that the “naysayers” are on the right side of history, at least for a time. In the 30 different bear markets that have occurred since 1929, the stock market registered an average decline of 29.7%. These downturns lasted have lasted for an average of 341 days. 86% of the bear markets last less than 20 months, and few last longer than one year.  

Right now, according to traditional economic interpretations, the U.S. could well be in a recession. We have seen two-quarters of GDP contraction. The Commerce Department reported that gross domestic product shrank by 0.9% in the second quarter of, after contracting 1.6% in the first quarter of this year. That’s it, that is the traditional definition of a recession, and the Bear market has priced that move in as a result. 

So why the “is this a recession this time” talk? Well, there has been a rash of different pro-growth data that has persisted. Wages have grown, unemployment has stayed low, and demand for freight, semiconductors, and component raw materials has been high. These would indicate that demand is still healthy. How can you have a recession with such a demand for materials? 

If the Fed can achieve the delicate balance of taming inflation by slowing the economy without tipping the country into a recession, this bear market could already be long in the tooth. If we count the correction from the November high, we will be entering the second year of the bear market next month. The one-year mark for this Bear market would come in March of 2023 (just around the corner by economic standards – meaning we are currently in the 3rd or 4th inning of the Bear Market with the most violent changes in pricing behind us. This would be an “un-recessionary bear market”

If the Fed fails in a “soft landing” in the first quarter of next year more reliable indicators of recession (falling commodity prices, major spikes in unemployment, and weakening manufacturing outlooks) are on the rise before the Fed quells inflation then we can see a more elongated bear market and a full-blown recession. 

More related articles:

Articles
Kevin Taylor

Divorce Playbook: When Should You Consider Mediation 

Alternatives to the courts for legal separation are called mediation and determining early on if this arrangement is right for you can be important to moving forward. The relationship you have with your spouse might determine much of this, but the expected outcome is what is most important. Mediation does not substitute having or using a lawyer as part of the process. But if you and your spouse can work together to reach a fair settlement on most or all of the issues in your divorce (eg., child custody, child support, alimony, and property division), choosing mediation to resolve your divorce case may save thousands of dollars in legal fees and emotional aggravation. The mediation process involves a neutral third-party mediator (an experienced family law attorney trained in mediation) that meets with the divorcing couple and helps them reach an agreement on the issues in their divorce. Every mediation firm will have its process for working through issues, both financial and legal as they separate assets. It’s important to have a good understanding of the current and future valuations of assets during this process and with a mediator who uses a financial expert to support these calculations.   Mediation is completely voluntary and this course can be abandoned in favor of the courts if the parties cannot agree, or if one or both parties are uncooperative. The mediator should not act as a judge, or insist on any particular outcome or agreement.  Mediation also provides divorcing couples a lot of flexibility, in terms of making their own decisions about what works best for their family, compared with the traditional adversarial legal process, which involves a court trial where a judge makes all the decisions. Mediation, however, is not appropriate for all couples. For example, if one spouse is hiding assets or income, and refuses to come clean, you may have to head to court where a judge can order your spouse to comply. Or, if one spouse is unwilling to compromise, mediation probably won’t work. The Complete Playbook

Read More »
Articles
Kevin Taylor

The Room where it Happens

The future of digital assets is more about the people in the room than the asset itself. The evolving landscape of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States is increasingly being shaped not by the viability of the asset class itself, but by the individuals occupying key positions within the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Personnel changes within the SEC serve as a leading indicator for the fundamental story behind non-Bitcoin digital assets—those that have long struggled for institutional legitimacy despite their technological and financial innovations.  While Bitcoin has solidified its position as an institutional-grade asset, backed by spot ETFs and growing mainstream adoption, the same access has been denied to a vast ecosystem of blockchain projects that could drive the next wave of financial transformation. This regulatory suppression of non-Bitcoin assets has limited investment funds from engaging in these projects, preventing institutional capital from identifying and supporting the most promising innovations in decentralized finance, Web3, and blockchain-based infrastructure.  With new leadership emerging at the SEC, 2025 could mark the beginning of a shift—one where policies no longer act as an artificial barrier to institutional investment but instead create pathways for these assets to be integrated into traditional finance. Gary Gensler’s departure from the SEC marks the end of one of the most aggressive regulatory stances on cryptocurrency in the agency’s history. Since taking office in 2021, Gensler maintained that nearly all digital assets, aside from Bitcoin, were securities under U.S. law—subjecting them to strict regulatory oversight and enforcement actions. His tenure was characterized by a “regulation by enforcement” approach, where major crypto firms, including Coinbase and Binance, faced lawsuits rather than clear guidance on compliance. Gensler resisted approving spot Bitcoin ETFs until legal pressure from Grayscale forced the SEC’s hand, and he consistently pushed for broader jurisdiction over the digital asset space, often clashing with crypto-friendly policymakers. His departure signals a potential shift in SEC priorities, as the incoming leadership appears more open to defining clearer rules and allowing broader institutional access to crypto beyond just Bitcoin. For non-Bitcoin assets, this could mean the first real opportunity for investment firms to offer products that include Ethereum, XRP, Solana, and other blockchain-based projects without the constant fear of regulatory crackdowns. Mark T. Uyeda: Steering the SEC Toward Crypto-Friendly Policies Appointed as the SEC’s Acting Chairman in January 2025, Mark T. Uyeda has been instrumental in reshaping the agency’s approach to cryptocurrency regulation. His tenure marks a departure from the previous administration’s stringent enforcement actions, aiming instead to foster innovation within the crypto industry. Uyeda’s initiatives include the formation of a dedicated Crypto Task Force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, to develop a comprehensive and clear regulatory framework for crypto assets. sec.gov Uyeda’s leadership reflects a broader pro-crypto stance within the current administration, aligning with President Trump’s vision of the United States as a global hub for the crypto industry. This approach is anticipated to resolve ongoing legal challenges and provide clearer guidelines for crypto exchanges and investors. reuters.com Hester M. Peirce: Championing Innovation with Regulatory Clarity Known affectionately as “Crypto Mom,” Commissioner Hester M. Peirce has long advocated for a balanced regulatory approach that encourages innovation while protecting investors. As the head of the newly established Crypto Task Force, Peirce is tasked with creating a regulatory environment that offers clear guidelines and practical solutions for crypto companies seeking compliance. sec.gov Peirce’s leadership is expected to be pivotal in shaping policies that facilitate institutional adoption of crypto investment products. Her focus includes clarifying the status of crypto assets under securities laws, updating broker-dealer regulations, and providing frameworks for investment advisers to custody client assets. These initiatives aim to remove existing barriers, enabling large investment firms to offer crypto-related solutions, thereby expanding access for investors and integrating crypto assets into retirement strategies like 401(k)s and IRAs. sec.gov Caroline A. Crenshaw: A Potential Shift in the Commission’s Dynamics Commissioner Caroline A. Crenshaw, appointed during the previous Trump administration, has been known for her cautious approach toward crypto regulation. With her term having expired in December 2024 and no vote taken on her reappointment, there is speculation about her future role within the SEC. The current administration may seek to appoint a successor whose views align more closely with its pro-crypto agenda, further influencing the regulatory landscape. Driving Institutional Adoption Through Regulatory Evolution The collective efforts of these key figures are poised to significantly impact the institutional adoption of cryptocurrency investment products. By establishing clearer regulatory frameworks and reducing compliance uncertainties, the SEC aims to create an environment where large investment firms can confidently offer crypto-related services. This progression is expected to open avenues for financial advisors and institutions to include crypto assets in long-term investment strategies, thereby broadening access for a wider range of investors. In conclusion, the trajectory of cryptocurrency investment access in the United States is being shaped by the strategic actions and philosophies of pivotal SEC leaders. Their commitment to balancing innovation with investor protection is setting the stage for a more inclusive and well-regulated crypto investment landscape.  

Read More »
Boulder Financial Planning Experts
Articles
Kevin Taylor

Why InSight invented the Relationship Balance Sheet

Financial Planning is something that we should all do in order to make sure that we are ready and prepared for the future. The earlier you start, the easier it will be to get there. Along the way, there will be several milestones and headwinds. So in anticipation of those moments, we document the decisions and behaviors we have helped clients change that put their financial plans in better soil. We call that document the Relationship Balance Sheet At InSight, we think it’s important to do two things as part of the financial planning process. First, we think that the efforts our clients are engaged in, like putting the needs of their future before the needs of the present and finding new and creative ways to get ahead of the game in planning. Secondly, we think having a documented record of our progress in our habits and behaviors is a valuable source of support when things get hard and markets get rough.  Knowing that we are doing the controllable parts of financial planning, the process of financial planning, we know that our futures are intact and the plans will unfold the way we anticipate.  Individuals and businesses are always looking for someone they can trust with their finances. As the number of people reaching retirement age rises, the skills required of financial planners need to become more sophisticated. This is why InSight has crafted the “Relationship Balance Sheet”, a method of taking stock of the efforts our clients make and reflecting them back on our clients. Partly as a way of showing clients the less tangible progress they have made in the prior year, and partly as a way of documenting the decades of positive decision-making that got clients to their goals.  We at InSight have yet to find a way to chart the long-term impact of every success we have been able to coach into the habits of our clients, so we developed the Relationship Balance Sheet to enshrine and celebrate

Read More »

Pin It on Pinterest